Indian Penal Code 45 Of 1860 Section 380 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian penal code 45 of 1860 section 380 Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 324 results (0.843 seconds)Ram Nath Monga Vs. Hem Chand
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-1972
Reported in : 1973CriLJ512; ILR1972Delhi189
m thereof the definition of court of justice in the indian penal code was noticed the high court proceeded to find a filed a complaint against b under section 193 indian penal code alleging that b has filed a false affidavit in committed the offence under section 193 of the indian penal code by securing a false report on the summons that he section 193 and section 228 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 and the controller shall be deemed to be and section 225 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 and the controller shall be deemed to be a civil 476 of the code but he did not deal with section 195 thereof 10 the act was examined in rain parshad
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: A.K. Pandurangam
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-14-1972
Reported in : 1973CriLJ1314; (1973)1MLJ22
coming to the conclusion that an offence under section 420 indian penal code i e cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of to the conclusion that an offence under section 420 indian penal code i e cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property the procedure prescribed under section 195 1 b criminal procedure code was not followed the lower court has mentioned in its the purposes of section 196 of the indian penal code xlv of 1860 6 thus it is clear that the filing of section 196 of the indian penal code xlv of 1860 6 thus it is clear that the filing of an gokulakrishnan j 1 the appellant herein has been convicted under section 420 indian penal code and sentenced to undergo regorious imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarasingha Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Oct-12-1972
Reported in : 38(1972)CLT1173; 1973CriLJ1744
acts of bribe taking as in section 161 of the indian penal code but it is of a general character individual repayment of his loan then it does not become a penalty nor the action become punitive but it remains as a run thus 5 a i notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1898 5 of 1898 no police officer section 165 or section 165a of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 or under section 5 of the act without or section 165a of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 or under section 5 of the act without the order 1972 section 56 confiscation of vehicle held the authorities under section 56 of the orissa forest act 1972 are not obliged
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.K. Kedar Vs. State of West Bengal
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-02-1972
Reported in : AIR1972SC1647; (1972)3SCC816; [1973]1SCR488; 1973(5)LC62(SC)
committing mischief within the meaning of section 425 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 by fire or any explosive mischief within the meaning of section 425 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 by fire or any explosive substance within the meaning of section 425 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 by fire or any explosive substance on the meaning of section 425 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 by fire or any explosive substance on any of section 425 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 by fire or any explosive substance on any property of under sub section 1 read with sub section 3 of section 3 of the west bengal prevention of violent activities act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Palaniappan
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-03-1972
Reported in : (1972)2MLJ497
the appellant with any right of protection under section 84 indian penal code 47 i am however satisfied that in view to invoke the benefits of exceptions of section 300 indian penal code on the other hand if a person kills another the sub inspector altered the section to 302 indian penal code and sent express reports to the concerned officers on receiving crime under section 307 indian penal code 7 at 6 45 p m on the same day ramasami died at the case the appellant has not made good his defence under section 84 of the indian penal code and that consequently his
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsa Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-31-1972
Reported in : AIR1973SC512; 1973CriLJ623; (1972)3SCC746a; 1972(4)LC675(SC)
appellant for the offence under s 477a 199 of the indian penal code because it was committed within the scope of trial and conviction of the appellant under s 409 indian penal code for defalcation of the two sums of rs 10 of the appellant under s 409 of the indian penal code because the act of criminal misappropriation was not committed by appeal by special leave by asa singh 48 sewa singh 45 darshan singh 32 iqbal singh 30 and kehar singh 65 sections 148 149 302 and 324 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence punishable under sections 148 149 penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence punishable under sections 148 149 302 and 324 eye witnesses is in accord
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSham Lal and anr. Vs. the State
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-01-1972
Reported in : ILR1973Delhi273
324 indian penal code and that conviction under section 326 indian penal code was not proper it is unfortunate that the indian penal code and that conviction under section 326 indian penal code was not proper it is unfortunate that the concerned record of the sessions court under section 288 criminal procedure code by the learned addl sessions judge after he was duly the amputation of his right leg he died at 5 45 p m on 17 6 1970 he had developed pneumonia his statement before the committing magistrate in a case under section 307 1 p c he had been convicted under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheoram Singh and anr. Vs. the State of U.P.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-23-1972
Reported in : AIR1972SC2555; 1973CriLJ26; (1973)3SCC110; [1973]1SCR939; 1973(5)LC286(SC)
for the offence under section 302 read with section 149 indian penal code in other respects the appeal of sheoram singh the offence under section 302 read with section 149 indian penal code is not well founded the reasons which led to offence under section 307 read with section 149 indian penal code it was not the object of the unlawful assembly in 4 1964 arjun singh went at 2 00 or 2 45 p m to railway station nagarwara to see off his sections 148 149 302 and 307 of indian penal code 1860 appellant was tried and convicted under sections 148 149 302 under which they can be convicted including the applicability of section 34 and 149 indian penal code 2 the prosecution case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurcharan Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-25-1972
Reported in : AIR1973SC486; 1972CriLJ1200; (1972)3SCC668; 1973(5)LC40(SC)
148 302 149 323 149 324 149 and 455 149 indian penal code in respect of an attack on one hari accordingly dismissed criminal murder sections 149 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence under sections 302 dismissed criminal murder sections 149 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence under sections 302 149 ram singh on the 22nd march 1968 at about 10 45 p m when hari kishan sat down to have his criminal murder sections 149 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence under sections 302 149 injuries them under section 302 149 ipc and convicted them under sections 148 326 149 324 149 323 149 and 455 149
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManmal Bhutoria Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-14-1972
offence punishable under section 161 or section 165 of the indian penal code or of an offence referred to in clause convicted of the offence under section 409 of the indian penal code by the trial magistrate the trial by the ordinary of the various clauses under section 21 of the penal code i have no doubt that a person who was previously try the complaint against the accused would still remain outstanding 45 keeping in view the decision of the supreme court in that bhattacharjee is a person against whom a charge under section 5 1 d and section 5 2 can be validly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT