Skip to content


Indian Penal Code 45 Of 1860 Section 380 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: indian penal code 45 of 1860 section 380 Year: 1922 Page 1 of about 329 results (0.768 seconds)
Dec 23 1922 (PC)

Gopal Naidu and anr. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-1922

Reported in : (1923)ILR46Bom605

without warrant police officer charged with offence under section 342 indian penal code private defence or justification rules of english common without a warrant but after the passing of the indian penal code in 1860 and the criminal procedure code in 1861 of wrongful restraint under section 341 of the indian penal code the learned judges very naturally considered that it would be of police officers indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 police officers indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 295a into force of the first code of criminal procedure these sections were repealed but section 21 was left unrepealed this no

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1922 (PC)

In Re: Mohideen Pakkiri Marakkayar (Accused)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-1922

Reported in : (1922)ILR65Mad839

complaint is statedly of an offence punishable under section 177 indian penal code within the meaning of section 40 of the committed the offence described in section 177 of the indian penal code where then did the petitioner make the statement in statedly of an offence punishable under section 177 indian penal code within the meaning of section 40 of the income tax of 1918 sections 40 17 21 3 indian penal code xlv of 1860 section 177 false verification presentation of petition jurisdiction sections 40 17 21 3 indian penal code xlv of 1860 section 177 false verification presentation of petition jurisdiction of court which he afterwards presented to the revenue divisional officer under section 21 of the income tax act that verification was made

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 1922 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Venkatrao Rajerao Mudvedkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-1922

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR386

..... the conviction and sentence and dismiss the appeal indian penal code act xlv of 1860 section 228 contempt of court insult to a judge criminal procedure code act v of 1898 sections 380 342 trial of accused summary procedure the ..... i differ from macleod c j when he says that the offence under section 228 of the indian penal code is of an entirely different nature from other offences as defined in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 1922 (PC)

In Re: Naramban and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-1922

Reported in : 71Ind.Cas.877

the accused of having committed an offence under section 395 indian penal code he has not discussed the evidence at all by the sub magistrate under sections 379 and 323 indian penal code and they are still under trial before him the on charge of a dacoity under section 395 indian penal code whether in view of the fact that the first three re 65 ind cas 993 1922 m w n 13 45 3 cr l j 209 16 l w 460 and further disposal according to law penal code act xlv of 1860 section 591 dacoily robbery with violence criminal procedure code act committed to the sessions on charge of a dacoity under section 395 indian penal code whether in view of the fact

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 1922 (PC)

Emperor Vs. AmiruddIn Salebhoy Tyabjee

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1922

Reported in : AIR1923Bom44; (1922)24BOMLR534; 67Ind.Cas.818

done would amount to an offence punishable under section 161 indian penal code it is urged that in view of the contracts punishable with imprisonment under section 161 of the indian penal code which said offence was not committed in consequence of illegal gratification 9 under section 161 of the indian penal code whoever being a public servant accepts or obtains or agrees am concerned with in this appeal indian penal code act xlv of l860 sections 161 116 public servant bribe offer of that could do more than mitigate the offence since under section 161 gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratification or to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1922 (PC)

Matti Venkanna and Eleven ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1922

Reported in : (1923)ILR46Bom257

lower court as the offence under section 143 of the indian penal code is not compoundable 3 the common object charged the petitioners objection therefore fails i dismiss this petition indian penal code act xlv of 1860 sections 143 and 447 unlawful petitioners objection therefore fails i dismiss this petition indian penal code act xlv of 1860 sections 143 and 447 unlawful assembly therefore fails i dismiss this petition indian penal code act xlv of 1860 sections 143 and 447 unlawful assembly criminal trespass i dismiss this petition indian penal code act xlv of 1860 sections 143 and 447 unlawful assembly criminal trespass compounding an the indian penal cede was illegal since the offence under section 447 indian penal cede was compounded 2 it appears that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1922 (PC)

Dinshaji Edalji Karkaria Vs. Jehangir Cowasji Mistri

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-1922

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR400

the slightest justification in my opinion the provisions of the indian penal code are strictly applicable to this case so that disregard the 9th exception to section 499 of the indian penal code and consider whether the occasion on which the statement statement without any justification the provisions of the indian penal code are strictly applicable to him maharashtra scheduled castes scheduled tribes revision the application is therefore rejected indian penal code act xlv of 1860 section 499 exception 9 defamation defamatory statement by application is therefore rejected indian penal code act xlv of 1860 section 499 exception 9 defamation defamatory statement by a witness question was whether he was protected by exception 9 to section 499 of the indian penal code that exception can only

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1922 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Shuja-ud-dIn Ahmad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-1922

Reported in : (1922)ILR44All540

under section 408 and one under section 477a of the indian penal code i was at first inclined to the view 235 joinder of charges act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 408 and 477 a illegality joinder of charges act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 408 and 477 a illegality code sections 234 and 235 joinder of charges act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 408 and 477 a 234 and 235 joinder of charges act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 408 and 477 a illegality this could be done having regard to the provisions of section 235 read with the provisions of section 234 but i

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 1922 (PC)

Ahamad Thambi Maracayar Vs. Basava Maracayar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-10-1922

Reported in : (1923)ILR46Bom123

to date in the lower court will abide the result indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 date in the lower court will abide the result indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a in the lower court will abide the result indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 abide the result indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 the result indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 295a to eventuate in a wrong decision on fact or law section 115 cannot be called in aid see amir hassan khan

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 1922 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Hargayan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-27-1922

Reported in : (1923)ILR45All159

attempt to commit an offence under section 215 of the indian penal code i would therefore allow his application so far commit the offence mentioned in section 215 of the indian penal code in my opinion an attempt to take a gratification months rigorous imprisonment act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 215 and 511 attempt proposal to procure restoration of 50 and in default three months rigorous imprisonment act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 215 and 511 attempt in default three months rigorous imprisonment act no xlv of 1860 indian penal code sections 215 and 511 attempt proposal to an attempt to take a gratification within the meaning of section 215 of the indian penal code necessarily includes the idea

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //