Indian Evidence Act 1872 Amending Act 1 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian evidence act 1872 amending act 1 Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 383 results (1.954 seconds)P. SirajuddIn Vs. Government of Madras and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Mad117; 1968CriLJ493; (1968)1MLJ480
..... the provisions of s 32 clause i of the indian evidence act 1872 i of 1872 or to affect the provision of s 27 of that act 163 1 no police officer or other person ..... evidence made admissible without formal proof but under the amended code the legislature has in sec 207 a prescribed a special procedure in proceedings for ..... testimony as to alleged statements or both in p kotayya v emperor 74 ind app 65 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohima Ranjan Roy and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-30-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Cal42,1967CriLJ45
sections 147 148 447 379 504 and 342 of the indian penal code it was alleged inter alia that the accused the midst of the trial or immediately after finishing the evidence for the prosecution the magistrate decides to commit the accused what is necessary is that as soon as a magistrate acting under section 347 has made up his mind to commit purposes subject to the provisions of the indian evidence act 1872 by quoting this section mr banerjee urges mat before the in cases like the instant one should be gone into 14 lastly we may refer to another decision of a division
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.R. Melwani Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-12-1966
Reported in: (1967)69BOMLR421
..... by section 145 of the indian evidence act 1872 the statement of a witness recorded by a police officer under section 161 criminal procedure code cannot ..... in criminal trials before the amendment of 1955 but as pointed out above there was a proviso to section 162 criminal procedure code ..... must be fulfilled namely 1 whether there was an issue of fact in the previous proceedings 2 whether the issue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuppuswamy Chettiar Vs. A.S.P.A. Arumugam Chettiar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1395; [1967]1SCR275
..... the last four attesting witnesses gave evidence and having regard to s 68 of the indian evidence act 1872 the execution of ex b 1 was not proved there is ..... from the scope of the suit and the plaint be amended accordingly this application was allowed by the court on january ..... with the high court we accept the testimony of the respondents witnesses and we reject the evidence of the appellant and p w 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of West Bengal Vs. Indian Steel and Wire Products Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-17-1966
Reported in: [1967]19STC319(Cal)
..... be treated as confidential and notwithstanding anything contained in the indian evidence act 1872 no court shall save as aforesaid be entitled to require any servant ..... the petitioner was a dealer within the meaning of the act as amended in 1950 b on receipt of certain communication from the ..... company s case1 rule 81 2 of the defence of india 1 a i r 1963 s c 1207 32 rules was promulgated under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShivlal Amarji and Sons Vs. Maganlal Lakhmichand
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-28-1966
Reported in: (1966)7GLR802
j 1 922 which corresponds to section 137 of the indian income tax act 1966 those sections are in pari materia books in court for the purposes of using them as evidence a party was free to produce such documents or books on account of the fact that section 64 of the act created a statutory bar against any servant of the government confidential and notwithstanding anything contained in the indian evidence act 1872 no court shall save as aforesaid be entitled to require account books in exercise of the inherent powers under section 151 it was held at page 219 that the inherent powers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRangu Vithoba and ors. Vs. Rambha Dina and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-07-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Bom382; (1967)69BOMLR559; 1967MhLJ341
..... meghraj singh 1933 a i r all 443 referred to under section 90 of the indian evidence act 1872 the court has discretion either to presume the matters referred to therein as proved or may call for proof of the same bangoo ..... plaintiff raised any objection or prayed for time to make a consequential amendment or to challenge the amendment allowed though the next hearing was to take place almost after .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Vinaya Chandra Chhota Lal Patni
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-05-1966
Reported in: 1967CriLJ668; (1967)GLR140(SC); [1967]1SCR249
court ruled that the said documents were admissible under the indian evidence act 1872 further it was not essential that the corroborated that statement this document too therefore was admissible in evidence and had been wrongly ignored by the learned judge 17 expert was conclusive under section 45 of the indian evidence act 1872 the court ruled that the opinion of handwriting expert the said documents were admissible under the indian evidence act 1872 further it was not essential that the handwriting expert must handwriting expert had been examined in support of his statement 11 this is sufficient to set aside the order of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmmathayee Ammal and anr. Vs. Kumaresan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC569; 1967(0)BLJR356; [1967]1SCR353
b the case discussed the presumption of legitimacy under the indian evidence act 1872 the court ruled that a conclusive presumption the case discussed the presumption of legitimacy under the indian evidence act 1872 the court ruled that a conclusive presumption that holding on the basis of s 112 of the evidence act that the paternity of the plaintiff respondent had been proved discussed the presumption of legitimacy under the indian evidence act 1872 the court ruled that a conclusive presumption that a child the sister of his second wife named supputhayee in february 1949 lakshmiammal gave birth to a son there is dispute as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBava Dolatgiri Itavagiri Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Guj296; 1968CriLJ1549
and sections 304 part ii 392 397 and 457 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction written dying declaration represents five packets of cigarettes which were established by reliable oral evidence and as a result he convicted and sentenced the appellant appeal dismissed criminal dying declaration section 32 of indian evidence act 1872 and sections 304 part ii 392 397 and 457 dismissed criminal dying declaration section 32 of indian evidence act 1872 and sections 304 part ii 392 397 and 457 of acquitted them as stated hereinabove but as regards accused no 1 the present appellant the learned judge came to the conclusion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT