Indian Evidence Act 1872 Amending Act 1 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian evidence act 1872 amending act 1 Page 1 of about 1,319 results (4.535 seconds)Ram Pal and anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2008CriLJ1395; JT2008(1)SC11; 2007(14)SCALE394; 2008AIRSCW101; 2008(1)AICLR471; 2008(1)LH(SC)1; 2008(3)KCCRSN227
kirkee factory it is therefore a cartridge manufactured by the indian ordnance factory at kirkee which has off and on been 45 s b sinha h s bedi jj murder forensic evidence accused alleged to have shot at the deceased killing him time when a weapon or cartridge was fired indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 45 s b high court we accordingly dismiss the appeal indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha 57 2 58ssg 15 6 83 1 89aaa 35 5 16 0 81bb 70 4 09 0 401 100 3 63
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of M.P. Vs. Wazir Khan and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2008(15)SCALE100
for consideration hence the appeal fail and is dismissed accordingly indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 but when the materials on record and the discrepancies in evidence as pointed out by accused persons are taken into account hence the appeal fail and is dismissed accordingly indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b dismissed accordingly indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha h s bedi jj last is dismissed accordingly indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha h s bedi jj
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSursingji Dajiraj Thakorsaheb Vs. Secretary of State
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1926Bom590
present there is no dispute that the article of the indian limitation act applicable is article 120 therefore the court has in which the above happened cannot be ascertained 13 no evidence has been given in this suit in regard to the joint judge s opinion give him a fresh cause of action consequently he held that the claim was barred by limitation not matter madgavkar j 29 i agree indian evidence act 1872 section 24 v s sirpurkar deepak verma jj dying declaration by the karbhari namely the kharda of 1877 a d 1821 the lands in dispute were shown in the name of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. Vs. Deoman Upadhyaya
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC1125; 1960CriLJ1504; [1961]1SCR14
..... a reasonable basis for the classification 60 the only solution is for the legislature to amend the section suitably and not for this court to discover some imaginary ground and sustain the classification i therefore hold that s 27 of the indian evidence act is void as violative of art 14 of the constitution 61 if so the question .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaishree Anant Khandekar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2009AIRSCW5997; JT2009(4)SC198; 2009(4)SCALE172; (2009)11SCC647; 2009(3)LHSC1439
to the death in this respect as indicated above the indian evidence act in view of the peculiar conditions of our iv 25 both taylor and wigmore in their treatise on evidence took refuge to the magic of shakespeare to illustrate the the unalloyed truth and that it is absolutely safe to act upon it if after careful scrutiny the court is satisfied of evidence is modelled on the indian evidence act of 1872 29 in the words of the author in the autumn w o danabhai tulshibai maheria v state of gujarat 2007 10 scc 362 where s b sinha j delivering the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh Vs. State of A.P.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2009AIRSCW2479; AIR2009SC3129; 2009CriLJ4144; 2009(10)SCALE69; 2009(2)LHSC1316; 2009(4)Scale521; 2009(4)KCCRSN235
accused was admitted and remained in hospital for many days indian penal code 1890 section 300 murder appellant with others alleged as it failed to take into consideration not only the evidence of pw 10 a police constable who had proved his the offence punishable under section 25 1a of the arms act all sentences were however directed to run concurrently 16 aggrieved from him held acquittal of accused proper indian evidence act 1872 section 45 expert evidence murder case report of dna expert taxi was used for making good of their escape pw 11 the driver of the taxi stated that at gun point
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindu JaIn Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2009SC976; 2009CriLJ951; JT2008(12)SC524; 2009(2)MPHT217(SC); 2008(15)SCALE168
filed by the accused are concerned the same are dismissed indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 police establishment and it was yet to be proved on evidence as to how r k jain died on account of allowed for remain present with him shri dixit recommended appropriate action to be taken against the accused for dereliction of duty a room which was occupied by them indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 27 s b sinha was quite clearly against the police report submitted under section 173 2 of the code of criminal procedure jain was declared
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarun Alias Gautam Mukherjee Vs. State of W.B.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)99; 2001CriLJ4937; I(2001)DMC401SC; JT2000(8)SC25; (2001)10SCC754
allowed accordingly the bail bonds of the appellant stands discharged indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 115 deceased had been taken first doctor pw 7 in his evidence stated that the patient herself reported about the history of the bail bonds of the appellant stands discharged indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 115 s b stands discharged indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 115 s b sinha lokeshwar singh panta jj promissory stands discharged indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 115 s b sinha lokeshwar singh panta jj promissory
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUjjagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : JT2008(1)SC1; 2008(1)KLJ590; 2007(14)SCALE428; 2008(1)Crimes31; 2007(8)Crimes375; 2008AIRSCW33; 2008CriLJ808; 2008(1)AICLR457; 2008(1)LH(SC)29; 2008(3)KCCRSN228.
sentence to life with this modification the appeal is dismissed indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 300 s b sinha h s bedi jj murder circumstantial evidence accused alleged to have killed his niece by gun and accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused 12 mr goburdhan with this modification the appeal is dismissed indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha p 1953crilj129 tufail alias simmi v state of u p 1969 3scc198 and ramgopal v state of maharashtra 1972crilj473 and shivaji
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKeshav Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2007(14)SCALE174; 2008(1)Crimes88; 2008(1)LH(SC)280.
forthwith if not required in connection with any other case indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 section 27 s b sinha h s bedi jj discovery evidence prosecution story that death was caused by inflicting an injury of a room which was occupied by them indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 27 s b required in connection with any other case indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha required in connection with any other case indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 3 s b sinha
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT