Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT:1. Federation of Sand Stone Mining Industries Association & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4241/2013) 2. Pukhraj Banjara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4242/2013) 3. Ganpat Singh Deval & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4209/2013) 4. Sakhawat Ali & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4216/2013) 5. Jheema Choudhary & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4217/2013) 6. Ganga Vishan & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4219/2013) 7. Chena Ram & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4223/20138. Raju Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3950/2013) 9. Babu Lal Meghwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3951/2013) DATE OF JUDGMENT : July 31st, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT:1. Federation of Sand Stone Mining Industries Association & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4241/2013) 2. Pukhraj Banjara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4242/2013) 3. Ganpat Singh Deval & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4209/2013) 4. Sakhawat Ali & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4216/2013) 5. Jheema Choudhary & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4217/2013) 6. Ganga Vishan & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4219/2013) 7. Chena Ram & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4223/20138. Raju Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3950/2013) 9. Babu Lal Meghwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3951/2013) DATE OF JUDGMENT : July 31st, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT:1. Federation of Sand Stone Mining Industries Association & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4241/2013) 2. Pukhraj Banjara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4242/2013) 3. Ganpat Singh Deval & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4209/2013) 4. Sakhawat Ali & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4216/2013) 5. Jheema Choudhary & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4217/2013) 6. Ganga Vishan & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4219/2013) 7. Chena Ram & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4223/20138. Raju Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3950/2013) 9. Babu Lal Meghwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3951/2013) DATE OF JUDGMENT : July 31st, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT:1. Federation of Sand Stone Mining Industries Association & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4241/2013) 2. Pukhraj Banjara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4242/2013) 3. Ganpat Singh Deval & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4209/2013) 4. Sakhawat Ali & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4216/2013) 5. Jheema Choudhary & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4217/2013) 6. Ganga Vishan & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4219/2013) 7. Chena Ram & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4223/20138. Raju Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3950/2013) 9. Babu Lal Meghwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3951/2013) DATE OF JUDGMENT : July 31st, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9027/2011 AND 8985/2011 BINANI CEMENT LTD. V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN Judgment dt:11/10/20111/24IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. .. 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9027/2011 (BINANI CEMENT LTD. V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.) 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8985/2011 (BINANI CEMENT LTD. V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.) Date of Judgment : 11th October, 2011PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the petitioner. --------1. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. These two writ petitions have been filed by the the impugnedpetitioner Binani Cement Limited challengingrectification order and consequential demand notices issued against it for assessment year 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 in which demand of approximately Rs.64.30 lacs has been raised against the said company manufacturing cement, as a consequence of amendment brought in Section 8 of the CST Act, 1956 including section 8(5) of the said ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11316/2010 & 11 other connected writ petitions ( See Schedule) Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. Judgment dt: 11/10/20111/53IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Jodhpur Development Authority, vs. Jodhpur State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11316/2010 & 11 other connected writ petitions ( See Schedule) DATE OF : PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. M.C.Bhoot, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Surendra Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Maheshwari, for the respondents. BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioner, Jodhpur Development Authority, through its 11th October, 2011Commissioner, has approached this Court by way of present batch of writ petitions, inter alia, claiming the quashing of judgment and order dated 26/10/2009 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Jodhpur on a complaint filed under Section 12 of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 177/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 177/2010 Smt. Champa & Ors. versus Rooplal Date of Order:13. h September, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Sajjan Singh with Mr. Manish Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Dr. Javed Moyal with Mr. Mohsin Dhera, for the respondent. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:-(Oral) (Per Jain, J.) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 3rd June, 2009 passed by Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur in Criminal Original Case No. 201/2003, whereby application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by present petitioners was partly allowed. The application of petitioner no.1 Smt. Champa wife of Rooplal was dismissed. Application filed by petitioners no. 1 and 2 namely Kumari Minal and Master Jatin was allowed and respondent Rooplal was directed to pay a sum of Rs.750/- per month to Kumari Minal and Rs. 750/- per mont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
{1} DBSAW NOS.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.715/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4591/2009 HILTON GRANITE LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (2) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.714/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10976/2011 ROCKWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (3) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.739/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7854/2009 ROCKWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT:- :: MARCH31t, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUNIL AMBWANI HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. J.P. Joshi with Mr. P.P. Choudhary, Mr. Siddharth Joshi and Mr. Rajendra Kataria, for the appellants. Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sunil Joshi and Mr. Dilip Kawadia, for the respondents. ***** (REPORTABLE) BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. We have heard learned counsel appea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
{1} DBSAW NOS.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.715/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4591/2009 HILTON GRANITE LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (2) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.714/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10976/2011 ROCKWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (3) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.739/2013 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7854/2009 ROCKWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT:- :: MARCH31t, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUNIL AMBWANI HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. J.P. Joshi with Mr. P.P. Choudhary, Mr. Siddharth Joshi and Mr. Rajendra Kataria, for the appellants. Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sunil Joshi and Mr. Dilip Kawadia, for the respondents. ***** (REPORTABLE) BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. We have heard learned counsel appea...
Tag this Judgment!