Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL MISC.APPEAL NO.917/2011 M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Limited Vs The Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) cum SDO, Girwa & Anr. Date of Judgment ::17. h November 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Manish Singhvi and Mr.Anjay Kothari for the appellant Mr.Akhilesh Rajpurohit and Mr.Vinit Sanadhya for the respondent No.2 NHAI Reportable BY THE COURT: Appellant, a company duly registered under the Companies Act, 1956 has laid this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act of 1996') to assail the impugned order dated 05.02.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.3, Udaipur (for short 'the learned court below') as well as the award dated 02.01.2007 rendered by Arbitral Tribunal and the award dated 11.08.2006 passed by the Competent Authority (LA)-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Girwa insofar as the same relate to compensation for acquisition of l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.628/2010 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8736/2008 Arun Singhvi vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai & Ors. Date of Judgment ::04. h November, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. N.R. Choudhary, for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Vyas, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. ---- BY THE COURT: (PER HON'BLE BHANSALI, J.) REPORTABLE This appeal has been filed by the appellant aggrieved against order dated 29.07.2010 passed by learned Single Judge, whereby, the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking to question the validity of Promotion Policy of the respondent New India Assurance Company ('the Company') qua persons with disabilities has been dismissed. The appellant joined the services of the respondent Company on 12.07.1985 on the post of Assistant; whereafter he was promoted on 28.09.2001 on the post of Senior Assistant;...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.314/2009 Smt.Shyama Vs Prithvi Singh & Ors. Date of Judgment ::9. h October 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Mahesh Thanvi for the appellant Mr.S.M.Parihar with Mr.Vinay Shrivastava for respondent No.1 Dr.Sachin Acharya for respondent Nos.4 & 5. Reportable BY THE COURT: Unsuccessful in her pursuit for cancellation of adoption deed in favour of the first respondent and partition of property, a biological daughter of late Shivram Tak, the appellant-plaintiff has preferred this first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CPC). The facts apposite for the purpose of this appeal are that appellant-plaintiff laid a civil suit for partition of the immoveable property, injunction and for declaration of adoption deed dated 16.06.1992 as nullity. By the said adoption deed, late Shivram Tak and his wife Shanti Devi adopted first respondent as their son. At t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER : 1. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8316/2015 Sukhmandar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan & ORS.2. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5885/2015 Raja Ram & ORS.V/s State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 21.9.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.D.S.Rajvi, for the petitioner/s. Mr.S.M.Toshniwal ) for the respondent/s. Mr.B.S.Sandhu ) ----- BY THE COURT: These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to question orders dated 18.12.2012 (Annex.4).order dated 3.5.2015 (Annex.6) and order dated 15.5.2015 (Annex.7) issued by the Special Officer, Water Resources and Chief Engineer, Water Resources (North).Hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of Chak 1MD to 6Md.Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar. The petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land from the State Governm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER : 1. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8316/2015 Sukhmandar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan & ORS.2. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5885/2015 Raja Ram & ORS.V/s State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 21.9.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.D.S.Rajvi, for the petitioner/s. Mr.S.M.Toshniwal ) for the respondent/s. Mr.B.S.Sandhu ) ----- BY THE COURT: These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to question orders dated 18.12.2012 (Annex.4).order dated 3.5.2015 (Annex.6) and order dated 15.5.2015 (Annex.7) issued by the Special Officer, Water Resources and Chief Engineer, Water Resources (North).Hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of Chak 1MD to 6Md.Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar. The petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land from the State Governm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
JODHPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7628/15) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER JODHPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7628/15) Dated: - 8th September, 2015. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr.Sanajeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ankur Mathur, Mr.Ankit Sethi and Mr.Rajesh Kala, for the petitioner. Dr.P.S.Bhati,Additional Advocate General with Mr.S.S.Rathore, for the respondents.1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 3.7.15 issued by the Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Rajasthan, banning the admission of the students in Jodhpur National University (for short 'the University') during the academic session 2015-16.2. The petitioner-University, a body corporate, has been constituted and established under the provisions of Jodhpur National University, Jodhpur Act, 2009 ( for short the Act. her...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in public interest, the petitioner, a practising lawyer at Jaipur Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, has prayed for directions to the Union of India through Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi-respondent no.1 and the State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur-respondent no.2, to treat SANTHARA or SALLEKHANA as illegal and punishable under the law of the land and that the instances given in the pleadings, be investigated and subjected to suitable prosecution of which, the abetment be also treated as criminal act. 2. The Santhara , which means a fast unto death, is a practice prevalent in Shvetambara group of Jain community. According to the petitioner, it is a religious fast unto death on the pretext that when all purpose of life have been served, or when the body is unable to serve any purpose of life, the Santhara will obtain Moksha (salv...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them as null and void ab initio so as the order dated 28.6.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan on criminal revision petition against the order dated 29.5.2014. A further prayer is to declare remand of accused petitioners as null and void so as the custody and they may be discharged and set at liberty. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 21.6.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3420/2014), order dated 18.8.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3798/2014). The challenge to the aforesaid orders have been made on the same grounds as have been urged in the main Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014 and separa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Ajay Rastogi, J. 1. Instant appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Kota whereby the suit for divorce filed at the instance of the plaintiff-appellant on the ground of cruelty by the defendant-respondent (husband) came to be dismissed. 2. The appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) and the respondent herein is husband. The petition, filed by the wife claiming divorce u/Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, came to be dismissed by the Family Court vide judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 despite two salient facts came on record that (1) in the FIR No.219 dated 12.09.2007 registered against the defendant-respondent (husband) at Police Station Mahila Thana, Kota for offence u/Sec.498-A, 406 and 120-B IPC after regular trial, the defendant-respondent (husband) was convicted u/Sec.498-A IPC and sentenced to undergo two years imprisonment vide judgment dated 12.10.2012, howev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. The petitioners are residents of Mundron Ka Bas, Gram Panchayat Napasar District Bikaner. By this petition, they have prayed for a direction to declare the Notification dated 18.9.2009 issued by the State Government as illegal and to quash the same with consequential directions, by which the Notification dated 6.10.2008 issued by the State Government under the authority of the Governor of Rajasthan declaring the Gram Panchayat Napasar as Municipality (Nagar Palika) Class IV, was withdrawn in exercise of the powers under section 3(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Ordinance, 2008, which was later-on enacted as the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009. The petitioners have also prayed for direction to hold elections for Municipal Board, Napasar and not to hold elections for Gram Panchayat, Napasar. 2. The interim relief application for staying the elections was rejected on 17.1.2005 on the ground that the elections were notified on 24.12.2014. 3. The Napasar is s...
Tag this Judgment!