Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, Actg. C.J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Mr.Bipin Gupta appears for Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ms.Parinitoo Jain for Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Ajmer. 2. The appellants are industrial consumers of electricity distribution companies, namely, Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited and Jodhpur Vitaran Nigam Limited (for short, 'the respondent-Discoms/Discoms'). They filed writ petitions for replacement of meters, as stipulated in Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Metering) Regulations, 2006 (for short, 'Regulations of 2006'), and to ensure that they are not deprived of the benefits of 3rd digit power factor incentive, on account of the failure of the Discoms in replacing meters of the required specifications. They also prayed for restraining the Discoms from making any recovery from the petitioners, of the differential amount between the 2nd digit power factor incentive and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, ACJ. 1. We have heard Ms. Indira Jai Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aditya Shrivastava, Ms. Bindu N. Doddahat and Mr. Satish Kumar for the petitioners in DBCWP No.375/2015-Dulari Devi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and DBCWP No.376/2015- Norati and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.; Mr. Rajendra Soni in DBCWP No.1/2015, Mr. Pradeep Kalwania in DBCWP No.209/2015; Shri S.S. Hora in DBCWP Nos.503/2015 and 504/2015; Mr. Vijay Choudhary in DBCWP No.251/2015, Mr. Hanuman Choudhary in DBCWP No.250/2015, Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj in DBCWP Nos.121/2015 and 122/2015, and Mr. Bharat Yadav for the petitioners. Mr. Narpal Mal Lodha, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Vishal Soni, Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Anurag Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Mr. R.B. Mathur, appear for the State of Rajasthan and other respondents. 2. By these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, order or d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJSTHAN AT JODHPUR .. :: O R D E R :: (1) Narpat Lal The State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10144/2010.Vs.(2) Sangeeta GehlotThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10143/2010.Vs.(3) Vimla DeviThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10145/2010.Vs.Date of Order::::11thOctober 2011.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Varun Goyal, for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, G.C., for the respondents. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJSTHAN AT JODHPUR .. :: O R D E R :: (1) Narpat Lal The State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10144/2010.Vs.(2) Sangeeta GehlotThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10143/2010.Vs.(3) Vimla DeviThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10145/2010.Vs.Date of Order::::11thOctober 2011.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Varun Goyal, for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, G.C., for the respondents. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJSTHAN AT JODHPUR .. :: O R D E R :: (1) Narpat Lal The State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10144/2010.Vs.(2) Sangeeta GehlotThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10143/2010.Vs.(3) Vimla DeviThe State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10145/2010.Vs.Date of Order::::11thOctober 2011.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Varun Goyal, for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, G.C., for the respondents. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioners having valid licenses for `barrel point' sale of diesel in the respective districts of the State of Rajasthan, for the period upto 2016 and 2017 (for two years from the date of issue or renewal), have challenged the order passed by the Additional Food Commissioner, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Rajasthan dated 19.12.2014, as well as the Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 2005 (for short, "the Central Order of 2005") issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas on 19th December, 2005 under section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the consequential actions, by which their licenses have been cancelled during the period of their validity. The petitioners have also prayed for declaration of clauses 2(d) and 3(4) of the Central Order of 2005, as unconstitution...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
P.K. Lohra, J. 1. This legal battle is unique wherein appellant is not pitted against any opponent much less formidable opponent. Appellant, Ms. Darshana Gupta, has laid this appeal under Section 52 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, Act of 2000) read with Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC) to assail the impugned order dated 18th December 2014, passed by learned District Judge, Udaipur (for short, 'learned Court below). 2. By the order impugned, endeavour made by the appellant in unison with proforma respondent Rajkiya Balika Garh/Visheshak Dattak Garhn Agency, Bal Adhikarita Vibhag, under Section 9 (4 and 5) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (for short, Act of 1956) read with Section 41 of the Act of 2000, to adopt a minor girl, Priti, proved abortive inasmuch as the learned Court below declined her prayer by citing embargo envisaged in clause (ii) of Section 11 of the Act of 1956, under the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. The petitioners are residents of Mundron Ka Bas, Gram Panchayat Napasar District Bikaner. By this petition, they have prayed for a direction to declare the Notification dated 18.9.2009 issued by the State Government as illegal and to quash the same with consequential directions, by which the Notification dated 6.10.2008 issued by the State Government under the authority of the Governor of Rajasthan declaring the Gram Panchayat Napasar as Municipality (Nagar Palika) Class IV, was withdrawn in exercise of the powers under section 3(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Ordinance, 2008, which was later-on enacted as the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009. The petitioners have also prayed for direction to hold elections for Municipal Board, Napasar and not to hold elections for Gram Panchayat, Napasar. 2. The interim relief application for staying the elections was rejected on 17.1.2005 on the ground that the elections were notified on 24.12.2014. 3. The Napasar is s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Mohammad Rafiq, J. 1. These two writ petitions, which involve identical questions of law and facts, were heard together and are being decided simultaneously. 2. Writ petition No.9716/2007 has been filed by Smt. Kamla Kanwar. Briefly stated, the facts of this case are that husband of petitioner late Naik Narayan Singh, 18th BSF Bn, had become permanently incapacitated for regular service in Indo-Pak War 1971 during Bangladesh operation. He was awarded Police Medal for gallantry by the President of India as per notification dated 19.12.1972 published in the Gazette of India dated 06.01.1973. The said award was made for gallantry under Rule 4(i) of the Rules governing the award of the Police Medal and consequently carries with it the special allowance admissible under Rule 5 thereof, with effect from 10.04.1971. In this connection, the Junior Staff Officer (Administration), Border Security Force, Jodhpur, sent a letter dated 07.04.1998 to Ex-LNK Narayan Singh. According to the petitioner,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.1211/2014 Bhanwar Lal vs. State & ors. a/w 6 connected matters Judgment dt:26/11/2014 1/83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (i) Bhanwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1211/2014 (ii) Rajendra Prasad Gora vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6249/2014. (iii) Tara Chand & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6250/2014 (iv) Ravindra Mohan Sharma vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6252/2014. (v) Balwant Singh vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6253/2014. (vi) Joga Ram & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6254/2014. (vii) Lokendra Kumar Charoria vs. State & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6255/2014. DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ]. Mr.A.K.Choudhary, ]. for the petitioners. Mr.Mahaveer Pareek ]. Mr. N.L.Verma ]. Mr. J.P.Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi...
Tag this Judgment!