Court : Jharkhand
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.4513of2011 ExcelVentureConstructionCo.(P)Ltd., throughoneofitsDirector,Sanjeet ...Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughthe Secretary,HousingDepartment,Govt.of Jharkhand,RanchiandOthers Respondents with W.P.(C)No.4443of2011 NirajKumarBhattacharya ...Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheSecretary, HousingDepartment,Govt.ofJharkhand, Ranchi&Others. Respondents with W.P.(C)No.4444of2011 KunalAnand ...Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheSecretary, HousingDepartment,Govt.ofJharkhand, Ranchi&Others. ...Respondents with W.P.(C)No.4618of2011 ModiProjectsLimited,throughoneofitsDirectors NavinModi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheSecretary, HousingDepartment,Govt.ofJharkhand, Ranchi&Others. Respondents with W.P.(C)No.4660of2011 ModiProjectsLimited,throughoneofitsDirectors NavinModi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheSecretary, HousingDepartment,Govt.ofJharkhand, Ranchi&Others. Respondents with W....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5225 of 2014 ..... M/s Tata Steel Ltd. an existing Company incorporated under the Companies Act through Mrs. Meena Lall wife of Shri Behari Lall, working as Chief Legal Services having registered office at 24, Homi Mody Street, PO Fort, PS Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, PO & PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum ... ... ... ..... ..... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Gelogy, Nepal House, PO & PS- Doranda, District-Ranchi 2. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, PO & PS- Chaibasa, District-West Singhbhum 3. Election Commission of India through Chief Electoral Officer-cum-Principal Secretary, Cabinet(Election) Department having its Office at Sector-2, PO & PS Dhurwa Town & District-Ranchi ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2543 of 2012 1. Surendra Prasad Suman, son of late Mauje Lal, Assistant Conservator of Forest, Wild Life Division, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi.2. Nand Kishore Sharma, son of late Mauje Lal Singh, Assistant Conservator of Forest office of Regional Chief Conservator of Forests, Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S. Jamshedpur, District-Singhbhum East. ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- 1. State of Jharkhand, 2. Chief Secretary, Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Hatia, District Ranchi. 3.Additional Chief Secretary, Forest and Environment Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi.4. State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, P.O. & P.S. Old Secretariat, District Patna.5. Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment Department, Govt. of Bihar, P.O., P.S. & District Patna.6. Arun Kumar Singh, son of Sri S. N. Singh, Divisional Forest Officer, Ramgarh Forest Division, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4868 of 2015 Binay Prakash S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad, Managing Director, M/s Ahelesha Corporation Ltd, Line Tank Road Ranchi ......... Petitioner Vrs.1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Administrator, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwari For the R.M.C : M/s Satya Narayan Prasad, Shashank Shekhar For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar, J.C to G.A. 09/17.06.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner , learned counsel for the respondent- Ranchi Municipal Corporation and the State.2. The brief fact of the case as are necessary to be noticed for deciding the present matter are as follows: A Title Suit No. 112 of 2006 was instituted for declaration of right, title , interest and confirmation of possession as also for recovery of possession and for temporary injunction by the plaintiff / petitioner herein against the defendant No.1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 W.P. (C) No. 2509 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2509 of 2016 ------- 1.M/S SINGHBHUM MINERAL COMPANY, a partnership firm, having its office at Station Road, Post Box No. 24, Chaibasa 833201, District West Singhbhum, represented through one of its Partner Shri Harilal Varjang Rathor, son of Late Varjang Harji Resident of Chaibasa, P.O and P.S. Chaibasa, Station Road, Post Box No. 24, Chaibasa -833201, District West Singhbum, Jharkhand. 2.SHRI HARILAL VARJANG RATHOR, son of Late Varjang Harji, Parter of M/S Singhbhum Mineral Company, Residnt of Chaibasa, P.O and P.S. Chaibasa, Chaibasa -833201, District West Singhbum, Jharkhand. ... Petitioners Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA, through the Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110001. 2.The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, The Department of Mines & Geology, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi, Pin-834002. . Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.no.701 o1. Mayank P. Trivedi 2. Smt. Nita Mayank Trivedi 3. Hitesh P. Trivedi Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM:HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Pandey Neeraj Rai, Advocate For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.M.S.Mittal, Sr. Advocate 7/ 12.9.13. The entire criminal proceeding of Complaint Case bearing No.1623 of 2012 including the order dated 12.9.2012 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken against the petitioners by the Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the court which has taken cognizance lacks territorial jurisdiction. Before adverting to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the case of the complainant needs to be taken notice of. It is the case of the complainant that the complainant having mar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 3801 of 2013 ----------- Tata Yodogawa Limited, a Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at XLRI Campus, Circuit House Area (East), Post Box No. 103, Jamshedpur-831001, District-Singhbhum (East), and works at P.O. and P.S. Gamharia, District-Saraikella-Kharsawan, through its Company Secretary Sri Prashant Kumar, Son of Sri Ishwar Lal, Resident of 4-Bagmati Road, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur-831001, District-Singhbhum (East). ..Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand State Electricity Board through its Chairman having its office at Engineers Bhawan, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.2. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Singhbhum Area Electricity Board, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Cooperative Bank Building, Bistupur, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, District-Singhbhum East.3. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Adityapur, Jh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2027 of 2016 --- M/s Shah Brothers --- - --- Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 5. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 6. The Assistant Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Advocate, Krishanu Ray, Advocate For the Resp - State: Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G. For the Resp UOI: Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI --- 02/ 21.04.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that surviving defects have already been removed.2. Petitioner was granted mining lease of Iron Ore over an area of 233.99 Hectare in Karampada Reserve Forest in West Singhbhum district...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3023 of 2007 Ram Gopal son of late Triveni Sahu, by faith Hindu, by occupation business, resident of Nazir Ali Lane, Church Road, Ranchi P.O. and P.S. Lower Bazar, Dist. Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1.Pravin Kumar Mehta 2.Sri Sudhir Kumar Mehta both sons of late Suraj Prakash Mehta resident of Defence Colony Opposite Mulchand Hospital, P.O. and P.S. Malvinagar, New Delhi Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. J.J.Sanga, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Shukla, Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocates --- 10/13.07.2017 Present writ petition has been filed for quashing of order dated 19.04.2007 in Title Suit No. 173 of 1997, passed by Sub-Judge, I, Ranchi, whereby the application dated 25.01.2007 filed on behalf of the plaintiff/petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 and under Order I Rule X read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (hereinafter referred as C.P.C.) has been rejec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Prakash Tatia, C. J. 1. These two writ petitions have been preferred to challenge the action of the Election Commission of Indiarespondent no.1, whereby the Election Commission has issued a notification dated 30th March, 2012, whereby counting the votes of the Biennial election to the Council of States from the State of Jharkhand scheduled to be taken at 5.00 p.m. on 30th March, 2012 has been stayed until a specific written clearance is given by the Election Commission of India to the Returning Officer –cum- Secretary In-charge for Biennial election to the Council of States from Jharkhand and to the Chief Electoral Officer, Jharkhand, Ranchi. The Election Commission of India further directed that result of counting of votes shall also not be declared without the specific clearance of the Election Commission. By this notification dated 30th March, 2012, the above authorities were directed to send the detail and comprehensive report about the conduct of poll with special reference ...
Tag this Judgment!