Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 7 Court: jharkhand Page 14 of about 336 results (0.090 seconds)

Mar 07 2011 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office and anr. Vs. Dr. Thakur Sur ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

1. The instant appeal arises out of a judgment and Award dated 17 th December 2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicle Accidents Claim Tribunal, Ranchi, in Compensation Case No. 35 of 2003. The appeal has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Challenging the Award to a tune of Rs. 16,48,887/-, which was liable to be paid by the insurer-appellant to the opposite party, who has suffered a permanent disability.2. The facts of the case are that the claimant Dr. Thakur Surendra Kumar Singh was traveling in his Maruti car bearing registration No. BR-26A-0949 from Latehar to Ranchi. When he reached near village Hutap River Bridge on NH-75, then all of a sudden a truck bearing registration No. JH-03A-1124, which was being driven rashly and negligently by the driver came from the opposite side and violently dashed with his Maruti car, as a result the doctor/ claimant sustained grievous multiple injuries on his person and the car was also badly damaged. Dr. Thakur Surendra...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2006 (HC)

Jainath Sahi Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR137(Jhr)]

R.K. Merathia, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing the orders passed by respondents No. 2 and 4 rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 (for short 'the Act') for restoration of Plot Nos. 404, 405, 407, 413, 428, 429 and 430 of Khata No. 155 of Village Tisia, P.S. Kisko, District Lohardaga against respondents No. 5 to 7.2. The facts in short are as follow:According to the petitioner, lands in R.S. Khewat No. 7 of Village Tisia, P. O. & P.S. Kisko, District Lohardaga stood recorded in the record of rights in the name of petitioner's grand father Chaitu Sahi, a member of the scheduled tribe. The lands appertaining to Khata No. 155 under Khewat No. 7 were recorded as his 'Bakast lands' and were in his khas possession which will be evident from the return filed by him in Form 'K' of the Bihar Land Reforms Act with a prayer to retain the same as 'raiyat'. The Revenue authorities after proper enquiry assessed the...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2017 (HC)

Jagdish Prasad Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation a C B Through S ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1057of2017 JagdishPrasad Petitioner Versus TheC.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1008of2017 SanjayKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1012of2017 AnilKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.AbhishekSinha,Advocate Mr.KumarHarsh,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1057of2017) Mr.RohitRanjanSinha,Advocate Mr.MohitManiKishore,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1008of2017) Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1012of2017) FortheC.B.I :Mr.KailashPrasadDeo,Advocate C.A.V.On:21/06/2017 Pronouncedon29/06/2017 Sinceallthethreeanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthe samecasehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 11(A)/2014Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120B,420,468and471 ofthe...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2017 (HC)

Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1057of2017 JagdishPrasad Petitioner Versus TheC.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1008of2017 SanjayKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1012of2017 AnilKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.AbhishekSinha,Advocate Mr.KumarHarsh,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1057of2017) Mr.RohitRanjanSinha,Advocate Mr.MohitManiKishore,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1008of2017) Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1012of2017) FortheC.B.I :Mr.KailashPrasadDeo,Advocate C.A.V.On:21/06/2017 Pronouncedon29/06/2017 Sinceallthethreeanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthe samecasehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 11(A)/2014Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120B,420,468and471 ofthe...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2016 (HC)

Sidharth Shankar Choudhary Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.3785of2015 SidharthShankarChoudhary @SiddharthShankarChoudhary ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.640of2016 AmarkantJha ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.676of2016 DevendraKumar ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.739of2016 ManikSingh ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.763of2016 BrahmdeoPrasadKeshri ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.769of2016 DilipKumarGupta ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.837of2016 DeoNarayanParihast ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party WITH A.B.A.No.1006of2016 MaheshwariDevi ..Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I. ..Opp.Party CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.IndrajitSinha,A...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2017 (HC)

Govind Musuf Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1054 of 2017 Devangan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:26. 04/2017 Under order dated 23.02.2017, case diary and injury report, if any was called for. Office note dated 22.04.2017 reveals that case diary and injury report has not been received. Office is directed to send an express reminder for transmission of case diary and injury report, if any. List this case after eight weeks. Till then, interim relief granted earlier shall continue. (Anant Bijay Singh, J.) Sunil/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1040 of 2017 1.Md. Satar Mian Mian @ Abdul Satar 2.Md. Karim 3.Md. Latif @ Latif 4.Md. Gayash 5.Md. Saraj 6.Rokshana Khatoon 7.Md. Kalam 8.Md. Idrish .. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTI...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2013 (HC)

Raj Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 47 of 2013 Raj Kumar and others ..........Petitioners Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Nivas Roy, G.P.III Mr. S.P. Roy, Adv.(State of Bihar) Mr. K.K. Singh,Adv.(for private respondent) ------ Reportable Dated 18th June, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying that F.I.R. pertaining to Hathauri P.S. Case No. 27/2007, dated 2.7.2007 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, which is now pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in the district of Samastipur (Bihar) may be quashed.3. Office has raised objection with respect to territori...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2027 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2207 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2515 of 2016 M/s Shah Brothers --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC20272016] Anil Khirwal --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC22072016] Padam Kumar Jain --- --- --- Petitioner [In WPC25152016] Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. The State of Jharkhand through the principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 5. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 6. The Assistant Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa --- --- --- Respondents [in all the cases] --- Coram: Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioners: M/s Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Advocate, Krishanu Ray, Advocate (in WPC20272016) M/s Indrajit Sinha, Krishanu Ray, Vijay Kant Dubey, Advocates (in WPC22072016 & WPC25152016) For the Re...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2027 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2207 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2515 of 2016 M/s Shah Brothers --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC20272016] Anil Khirwal --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC22072016] Padam Kumar Jain --- --- --- Petitioner [In WPC25152016] Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. The State of Jharkhand through the principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 5. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 6. The Assistant Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa --- --- --- Respondents [in all the cases] --- Coram: Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioners: M/s Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Advocate, Krishanu Ray, Advocate (in WPC20272016) M/s Indrajit Sinha, Krishanu Ray, Vijay Kant Dubey, Advocates (in WPC22072016 & WPC25152016) For the Re...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2027 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2207 of 2016 With W.P.(C) No. 2515 of 2016 M/s Shah Brothers --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC20272016] Anil Khirwal --- --- --- Petitioner [in WPC22072016] Padam Kumar Jain --- --- --- Petitioner [In WPC25152016] Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. The State of Jharkhand through the principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 5. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 6. The Assistant Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa --- --- --- Respondents [in all the cases] --- Coram: Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioners: M/s Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Advocate, Krishanu Ray, Advocate (in WPC20272016) M/s Indrajit Sinha, Krishanu Ray, Vijay Kant Dubey, Advocates (in WPC22072016 & WPC25152016) For the Re...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //