Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 144 of 2017 ---------- Akhtar Ansari, S/o Anwar Ansari, R/o Village- Thari, P.O. + P.S.- Chitra, District- Deoghar. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharati, A.P.P. ---------- 05/22.03.2017 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. for the State. In this application the petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 04.01.2017 passed by the learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Deoghar in POCSO Case No. 55 of 2016, arising out of Chitra P.S. Case No. 81 of 2016, G.R. No. 746 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the petitioner for being granted bail under the Provision of Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C. has been rejected. A written complaint was ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2375 of 2016 --- Sanju Gupta, S/o late Lalan Prasad, Resident of House No. 167, Line No. 5, Kashidih Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District-Singhbhum East. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Niazi, Advocate --- 07/22.03.2017 Heard the parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 28.9.2016, passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East in S.T. No. 280 of 2007, whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the petitioner to search out the original missing case diary along with the original documents has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for quashing of that part of the order dated 29.6.2008, by which the prosecution evidence has been ordered to be closed and the case h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arbitration Application No. 22 of 2017 --- M/s G.S. Malhotra represented by G.S. Malhotra --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India represented by General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur, Bihar 2. The Chief Engineer, Construction, Planning, MHX, Hazipur --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Gopi Nath Chandra, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate --- 06/ 15.09.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court under section 11(6)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.3. Petitioner was awarded a work for construction of 08 Units type-1(D/S), 101 Units typeII(D/S) and 08 Units type-III(D/S) quarters at Garhwa Road Railway Station vide letter of acceptance dated 28.09.1998 at the cost of Rs. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ArbitrationApplicationNo.22of2017 M/s.G.M.MalhotrarepresentedbyG.S.Malhotra....Petitioner vs. 1.UnionofIndiarepresentedbyGeneral Manager,EastCentralRailway,Hazipur,Bihar 2.TheChiefEngineer,Construction,Planning,MHX, Hazipur ...... Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.RamawatarSharma,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.GautamRakesh,Adv. 11/8.12.2017 Pursuanttotheorderdated15thSeptember,2017andtheprevious orderdated17thNovember,2017,adeclarationintermsofSection12(1) andreadwithVIth ScheduleoftheArbitrationandConciliationAct, 1996 as amended by Act no. 3 of 2016 has been furnished by the proposed Arbitrator Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Merathia (Retd.),FormerJudgeofthisCourt. ThisCourtbyorderdated15thSeptember,2017hadproposedto appointHon'bleMr.JusticeRameshKumarMerathia(Retd.),Former Judge of this Court as an independent Arbitrator. For better appreciation, the order dated 15th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2006(4)JCR166(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482, CrPC for quashing the entire criminal proceedings including the order dated 24.8.2004 whereby, and where under the S.D.J.M. Porahat at Chaibasa has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 26(1)(d)(f)(g) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Bihar Amendment Act, 1989 in connection with C/3 Case No. 12/2001 presently pending in the Court of Shri Vishal Srivastava, J.M. 1st Class, Chaibasa.2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 18.2.2001 Truck No BRV 9596 with another Truck No. BRS 2521 and one Dumper bearing registration No. BR-18-A 7271 were intercepted by the Forest Guard at Railway siding, Sonua Railway Station while the said vehicles were un-loading the stone metals on the reasonable suspicion that the stone metals were carried without authority from the Forest Area. On demand no valid paper was produced by the drivers of the said vehicles about the possession and transportation of the stone met...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 120 of 2014 Central Bank of India having its branch at main road P.O. And P.S. Bistupur, town Jamshedpur,DistrictSinghbhum(East)throughitsChiefManagerSri Chandramoni Samal,SonofLateKalandiSamal,ResidentofBhagwatiEnclave,A26/1Adityapur,P.O. And P.S. Adityapur, town Jamshedpur District Saraikella Kharsawan Jharkhand ............ Appellant Vs. 1.M/sGyanPressMetalPrivateLimited,PressandEngineeringDivision(Unit1andII) havingitsunitat1819TataNagarMillsandGodownArea,BurmaMines,Jamshedpur throughoneofitsDirectorsSriJjitendraPalSingh,SonofSriJaspalSingh,Residentof 775, New Sitaramdera, P.O. Agrico and P.S. Sitaramdera, Town Jamshedpur, Dist Singhbhum(East)(Jharkhand) Petitioner/RespondentNo.1 2.AuthorizedOfficer,CentralBankofIndia,RegionalOffice, LalpurChowkP.O.AndP.S.LalpurtownandDistrictRanchi. 3.TheZonalManagerCentralBankofIndia,havinghisofficeat2 nd floor,BlockB,MouryaLokComplex,DakBunglowRoadPatna1(Bihar) 4.Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Civil Review No.95 of 2012 Swati Enterprises, a partnership firm having its office and factory at village Garke, P.S. Namkum, P.O. Rajaulatu, District-Ranchi through its partner Smt. Neera Bathwal, wife of Sri Nirmal Kumar, resident of Dam Side, Kanke Road, P.S.Gonda,P.S and District-Ranchi ........................Petitioner V E RSUS1 State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.Hatia, District- Ranchi.2. Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa,P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi.3. Deputy Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having is office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.Dhurwa, P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi.4. Collector, Ranchi, having its office at New Collectorate Building, Kutchery R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6358 of 2015 Khushal Arjun Rathor S/o Shri Arjun ladha R/o Court Road, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum .... Petitioner Vrs.1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Mines & Geology 2. The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Mines, 3rd Floor,Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : M/s Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate : Mr. K. Venu Gopal, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate : Mr. N.K.Pasari, Advocate : Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Natrajan, A.S.G.I : Mrs Anubha Rawat Choudhary : Mr. Pratyush Kumar Jha For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G. : Mrs. Chaitali C. Sinha, J.C to A.A.G0428.04.2016 The writ petition was preferred on 21.12.2015 with a prayer to direct the respondent- State of Jharkhand to ensure compliance of the provisions of Section 8(A)(3) of the Mines and Mineral(D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arbitration Application No. 12 of 2017 --- M/s Sahil Projects and Planning Private Limited --- ---- Petitioner Versus The Eastern Railway through Chief Administrative Officer (Con), Construction Department --- --- Respondent --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate --- 07/ 11.08.2017 The order dated 04.08.2017 reads as under: Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Under Clause 64 of the agreement dated 21.1.2007, the Respondent- Railways had appointed an Arbitral Tribunal comprising 3 Arbitrators to adjudicate on the disputes raised by the petitioner. The proceedings however did not reached to finality and the panel was revised twice thereafter. The third panel also got terminated. As per the petitioner, term of the third Tribunal terminated on issuance of the letter dated 23.5.2016 requesting the petitioner to suggest two names out of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ArbitrationApplicationNo.12of2017 M/sSahilProjectsandPlanningPrivate Limited,DistrictHazaribagh .....Appellant vs. TheEasternRailway,throughitsChief AdministrativeOfficer(CON),Construction Department,14,Kolkata .....Respondent CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH FortheAppellant :Mr.IndrajitSinha,Adv. FortheRespondent :Mr.GautamRakesh,Adv. 8/1.9.2017 By the detailed order passed on 11th August, 2017, this Court proposedtoappointHon'bleMr.JusticeAnilKumarSinha,(Retired) FormerJudgeofPatnaHighCourtasanArbitratortoadjudicatethe disputebetweentheparties.TheproposedArbitratorwasrequiredto submit a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Arbitration and ConciliationAct,1996,asamendedbytheAct3of2016. Forbetter appreciation,theorderdated11082017isquotedhereunder: Theorderdated04.08.2017readsasunder: Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Under Clause 64 of the agreement dated 21.1.2007, the Respondent-Railways had appointed an Ar...
Tag this Judgment!