Court : Punjab and Haryana
IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8784 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:01. 10.2013 Hem Lata and others ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4 ***** 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Yes RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.The eight petitioners before this Court belong to the Ministerial cadre of the Haryana Public Relations Department. They were initially appointed as Clerks and, thereafter, earned promotion as Assistants. Presently, there are working on different posts including those of Accountant, Section In-charge, Press Facility Assistant, Auditor, Sales Manager etc. Their conditions of service are governed by the rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17471 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:01. 10.2013 Dolphil Minerals ..Petitioner versus Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Ajay Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana .. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE: (Oral) CM-15138-2010: Leave is granted to place on record the replication and the application is allowed. CWP-17471-2009:1. The Director, Mines and Geology, Haryana/respondent No.2 issued an auction notice on 5.11.2001 in the Gazette qua 22 minor mineral quarries including that of Kadarpur (187.95 hectares falling in Khasra Nos.92 to 95 of District Gurgaon) for a period of lease for 7 years, to be held on 18.11.2001. The petitioner was the highest bidder of the Kadarpur Mines at a value of `1.7...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.25217 of 2012 Date of Decision:01. 10.2013 Dr. Rajinder Kumar Singla ..Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. K.S.Sandhu, Mr. Bhaumik Mehta and Mr. Gautam Pathania, Advocates, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. B.S.Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner both in the nature of quo-warr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Crl.Misc.No.M-21428 of 2012 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl.Misc.No.M-21428 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.9.2013 Dr.Jatinder Kumar ......Petitioner Versus Good Morning India Media Pvt.Ltd.......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Vineet Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short `Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of criminal complaint No.1505461 dated 2.4.2012 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act for short) (Annexure P-5) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom including the summoning order dated 4.4.2012(Annexure P-6).Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in fact, the amount in question had been given by the petitioner to the respondent for the purposes of publication of an advertisement in the newspapers 'India News'/ 'Aaj Samaj' as ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** LPA No.1555 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.09.2013 **** Vijay Kumar & ORS.. . Appellants versus Sanjeev Kumar & ORS.. . Respondents **** CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. **** For appellants:- Mr.HS Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr.DS Nalwa, Addl. AG Haryana; Mr.Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate; Mr.R.K.Malik, Senior Advocate; Mr.Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate; MesSr.Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Nikhil Sharma, B.Jeet Sheoran, Vikram Singh, Rajesh Lamba, Ashutosh Kaushik, Dilbagh Singh, Advocates. For private Mr.Vivek Khatri, Advocate respondents :- Mr.Ramesh Goyal, Advocate Mr.SS Dinarpur, Advocate Mr.Rajinder Singh, Advocate Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate Mr.Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate Mr.Aru...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CRM No.M-3545 of 2013(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-3545 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:30.09.2013 Rajesh Kumar @ Rafiq Mohd. .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Preetwinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Jaspreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Ms.Gurpal Kaur Dulat, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral) The contour of the facts, which needs a necessary mention for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record is that on 06.01.2013, accused Rajesh Kumar @ Rafiq Mohd.(already married), son of Puran Chand, was stated to have procured and kidnapped the minor daughter of Sukh Lal, (prosecutrix)(name intentionally withheld). According to the prosecutrix, he took her to the house of his relative Matwinder Singh at Phillaur and forci...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Crl.Misc.No.M-33298 of 2012 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl.Misc.No.M-33298 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.9.2013 Kulwinder Singh Chauhan ......Petitioner Versus The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Ms.Satpreet Grewal Kapila, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short `Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of criminal complaint No.49102 dated 14.6.2011 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act for short) (Annexure P-2) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom including the summoning order dated 25.7.2011 (Annexure P-5).Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in fact, the petitioner had taken a loan from the complainant for purchase of an oil tanker in the sum of ` 18,66,000/- . In this regard petitioner had issued some blank c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1007 of 2013 (O&M Reserved on :27. 08.2013 Date of Decision:26. 09.2013 Justice Shanti Sarup Dewan, Chief Justice (Retired) and another Appellants Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present : Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Ahuja, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. J.S.Toor, Advocate for Union Territory, Chandigarh. Mr. Suvir Dewan, respondent No.7 in person and Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate with him. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL The filial affections of a father have cost him dearly in the twilight years of his life! 2. The appellant No.1 aged about 85 years is a retired Chief Justice of thi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CRWP-1585-2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1585-2013 Date of decision:24. 9.2013 Mohan Lal ........ Petitioner Versus Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. PRESENT: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Jain, AAG, Punjab. Mr. S.K. Arya, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. R.P. NAGRATH, J.The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, directing respondent No.2 to release and produce detenue-Nisha Devi daughter of the petitioner from illegal custody of respondents No.3 and 4 immediately.2. Nisha Devi and Vikas Kumar-respondent No.3 are present in person. Kataria Rishu 2013.09.30 18:15 I at...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CWP No.2488 of 1987 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CWP No.2488 of 1987 Inder Singh(deceased) through his LRs ....Petitioners Versus Gram Panchayat, Janherian & others ......Respondents (2) RSA No.56 of 1993 Gram Panchayat Janherian ....Appellant Versus Inder Singh(deceased) through his LRs .....Respondents Date of decision:24. 09.2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CWP No.2488 of 1987). Ms.G.K.Hundal, Advocate, for the appellant (in RSA No.56 of 1993). **** G.S.Sandhawalia J.1. This judgment shall dispose of CWP No.2488 of 1987 and RSA No.56 of 1993 as common question of facts and law are involved. Facts of CWP No.2488 of 1987 2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.10.1986 (Annexure R4) which is the warrant of possession, issued by the Collector, Patiala. The dispute pertains to 29 bighas 10 biswas of land falling in th...
Tag this Judgment!