Court : Punjab and Haryana
LPA No.2053 of 2011 & -:1. - other connected matters IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH1 LPA No.2053 of 2011 in CWP No.12796 of 2008 Date of decision : January 31, 2014 Chandigarh Administration & another ......Appellants Versus Mrs. Neera Goyal & Ors. ...... Respondents 2. LPA No.2078 of 2011 in CWP No.14316 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Versus H. L. Vij & another ...... Respondents 3. LPA No.2079 of 2011 in CWP No.12865 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Versus Vishnu Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...... Respondents 4. LPA No.2118 of 2011 in CWP No.12838 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration ......Appellant Versus M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Limited & Ors. ...... Respondents Chander Vikas 2014.02.07 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh LPA No.2053 of 2011 & -:2. - other connected matters 5. LPA No.2036 of 2011 in CWP No.14176 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Ve...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CWP No.15645 of 2011 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15645 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: January 30, 2014. Kultar Singh .Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner (s).Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for respondents No.3 to 11..Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of three petitions bearing CWP Nos.15645, 15646 of 2011 and 3825 of 2012, as common questions of law and facts are involved. Challenge in the bunch of petitions is to the selection and appointment to the post of Information and Public Relations Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that advertisement for 11 posts of Information and Public Relations Officer was issued by the Information and Public Relations Department, Punjab bearing No.PR (01/2009).which was published in 'Ajit' on 11.9.2009. In terms of the advertisement, total...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 1. CWP No.14006 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.01.2014 **** Devdutt & ORS.. Petitioners versus State of Haryana & ORS.. Respondents **** 2. CWP No.24033 of 2013 (O&M) **** Rajbir & ORS.. Petitioners versus State of Haryana & ORS.. Respondents **** 3. CWP No.25737 of 2013 (O&M) **** Dharambir & Anr. . Petitioners versus State of Haryana & ORS.. Respondents **** CORAM : HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA SURYA KANT HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. **** Present: Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate and Mr.Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Kamal Sehgal, Addl. AG Haryana Mr.Pranav Chadha, Advocate for Mr.Raman Gaur, Advocate (CWP No.14006 of 2013) Mr.Gitish Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr.Arun Walia, Advocate (CWP No.24033 of 2013) for HUDA **** Vishal V201401.29 10:17 I a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Saluja Mukesh Kumar RSA NO.21 of 2014 1 2014.02.05 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA NO.21 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:10.1.2014 Darshan Singh ...Appellant Versus Municipal Council, Bassi Pathana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK1 To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Present: Mr.Gourav Goel, Advocate, for the appellant. RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.(Oral) Plaintif has filed the instant regular second appeal against the concurrent findings recorded by the learned courts below in a suit for permanent injunction. Facts first. The suit for injunction was filed by the plaintiff-appellant claiming himself to be in physical possession of the shop in dispute for the last more than 50 years. It was pleaded that the plaintiff was running his business of repair of tractor parts etc. in the said shop under the name a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CR No.4154 of 2013(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No.4154 of 2013 Date of decision October 7, 2013 Kavita ....... Petitioner Versus Bhateri and another ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. S. S. Pathania, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not?. No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. No K. Kannan, J (oral).1. The revision petition is against an order allowing an application for amendment of a judgment delivered in succession certificate proceedings. The mother of the deceased on the one hand and widow and son of the deceased on the other were at logger heads with two independent petitions for issue of succession certificate for outstanding dues to the estate of the deceased. The application was filed for amendment to conclude the amount due to the estate in a Group Insurance Scheme. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Crl.Misc.No.M-8679 of 2012 (O&M) 1 Crl.Misc.No.M-25571 of 2012 (O&M) Crl.Misc.No.M-14205 of 2013 (O&M) In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: 07.10.2013 Crl.Misc.No.M-8679 of 2012 (O&M) Sanjeet Kumar Malik ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Crl.Misc.No.M-25571 of 2012 (O&M) Randhir Singh Malik ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Crl.Misc.No.M-14205 of 2013 (O&M) Sewa Ram ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.R.S.Rai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M No.8679 of 2012. Mr.Baldev Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Anhul Singh, Advocate, for petitioner in CRM-M No.25571 of 2012. Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for petitioner in CRM-M14205of 2013 Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Addl.A.G.Haryana. Mr.D.K.Khanna, Advocate forrespondent No.2. **** Devi Anita 2013.10.08 16:00 I am approving this doc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
-1- Civil Revision No.6022 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6022 of 2011 Reserved on: 18.09.2013 Date of decision: 05.10.2013 Sukhjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus Krishana Kumari and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. Yes 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?. Yes 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Yes Argued by: - Mr.S.S.Narula, Advocate, and Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. Instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside the order dated 06.08.2011 (Annexure P-13) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division).Nakodar, whereby application moved by the petitioner under Section 148 read with Section 151 CPC for extension of time to deposit the balance sal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Rs.No.3935 of 2002 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.3935 of 2002 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 05.10.2013 Kirpal Singh (deceased) through LRs ...Appellants Versus Karnail Ram & others ...Respondents CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present:-Mr.Rakesh Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Kashmir Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Y.S.Turka, Advocate for the respondents. FATEH DEEP SINGH, J After having been unsuccessful throughout before the trial Court and thereafter, before the FiRs.Appellate Court, the unsuccessful defendants have preferred to assail the same through instant regular second appeal on the grounds spelled out therein. The facts that needs to be highlighted are that plaintiff Lillu Ram (now deceased) being represented by his LRs and other plaintiffs including plaintiff Budhu (now deceased) being represented by his LRs instituted against defendants Punnu Ram and others a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 24th November, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
C.R. No.4420 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4420 of 2011 Date of Decision. 04.10.2013 Rasaljit Singh son of Hari Singh .......Petitioner Versus Smt. Palvinder Kaur widow of Atma Singh alias Amrik Singh and others ......Respondents Present: Ms. Navdeep, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Bansal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. None for other respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. -.- K. KANNAN J.1. The revision petition is against the order in the petition for correction of the judgment filed under Section 152 CPC at the instance of the legal representative of the 2nd respondent which was dismissed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The counsel for the revision petitioner contends that the award passed on 02.03.2005 failed to take note o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Crl. Misc. No.M-10041 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-10041 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: Oct. 4,2013 Vijay @ Vijender ..................................Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...........................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana..RITU BAHRI, J. This petition is for quashing of the summoning order dated 24.4.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Sessions Judge, Sonepat whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction dated 15.7.2009 and order of sentence dated 16.7.2009 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ganaur, in FIR No.194 dated 30.6.2000 under Sections 148, 323, 324, 326, 452 read with Section 149 IPC registered at Police Station Kaur Rupinder 2013.10.11 16:32 I attest...
Tag this Judgment!