Increaser - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increaser Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 1,134 results (0.025 seconds)The Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-1996
Reported in: AIR1997HP1
..... of industry department of industrial development government of india the necessary endorsement regarding such increased capacity was also made on the industrial licence of the petitioner company the transport ..... the petitioner company submitted its return claiming transport subsidy on the basis of such increased capacity the subsidy so claimed by the petitioner company was initially not paid by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-19-1996
Reported in: 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)
..... payer who was passed on to others for instance by price increases the higher cost he has borne because of the overpayment ..... exercise however it has been criticised technically because inter alia price increases should mean that less will be sold and also because of ..... 1930 section 64a provides 64a in contracts of sale amount of increased or decreased taxes to be added or deduced unless different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Warehousing Corporation Through their Executive Engineer Vs. M ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)BomCR380
..... from the chief engineer superintending engineer he has been only empowered to decide whether the increase was attributable to delay in execution of the contract within the control of the contractor ..... instant case admittedly the chief engineer or the superintending engineer has not held that the increase claimed by the respondents was attributable to delay in execution of the contract within the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector-general Vs. Usha International Ltd. and anr.
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Oct-31-1996
..... day of the scheme the prices of usha fans were increased while price increases can be considered as a part of normal course of ..... noted that the prices of various categories of fans had been increased simultaneously from the date of the commencement of the advertised ..... scheme the respondents were promoting the usha brand of fan thus increasing inter brand competition 18 referring to prices of fan shri .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBush Vs. Vera
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-13-1996
..... majority black census blocks adjacent to district 30 s southern and eastern edge thereby increasing the proportion of black population still further because the alleged racial goals of the ..... that its general equal protection jurisprudence was insufficient for the task and announced an increasingly rigid simple to apply voting specific mandate of equipopulousity karlan still hazy after all .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT44 Liquormart, Inc. Vs. Rhode Island
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1996
..... plaintiffs expectation of realizing additional profits through price advertising has no necessary relationship to increased overall consumption 829 f supp at 549 moreover we attach little significance to ..... the american medical association had apparently concluded that advertising of alcohol in general increased total alcohol consumption sufficiently to make a ban on advertising worthwhile see 44 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Vrinda Gujarati and Others Vs. Bareilly Development Authority and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-14-1996
Reported in: AIR1997All107
..... grievance is that after the allotment rs 71 000 cannot be increased the petitioners further averred that they have paid five instalments ..... instalments 38 learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the increase in price has been justified in the synopsis the date ..... builders lake time therefore the respondent would be responsible for increase in the price and we give direction that the price .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. M.P. Audhyogik Vikas Nigam Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
Reported in: (1997)142CTR(MP)524; [1997]225ITR782(MP)
..... that the fee paid to the registrar of companies for increasing the authorised share capital is allowable as deduction under section ..... not revenue expenditure because it is in the nature of increasing the authorised share capital of the company and such expenditure ..... carry on its business and hence the expenses incurred for increasing the capital were bound up with the functioning and financing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajkamal Enterprises Vs. Manubhai Bhikhubhai Mistry
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-19-1996
Reported in: (1997)1GLR848
..... willing to pay the amount of the standard rent and permitted increases if any and observes and performs the other conditions of the ..... shall not be entitled to a the standard rent and permitted increases due for the premises b recover possession of such premises merely ..... on the ground of non payment of standard rent and permitted increases due during the period in which such premises remain so destroyed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Mohammed Ismail Vs. the Corporation of Madurai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)CTC455
..... affidavit further states that the respondent municipality and other corporations increased the licence fee for lease amount arbitrarily about ten years ..... quash the said notice and for bearing the respondent from increasing the rent beyond 15 of the rent paid for the ..... executed necessary agreement and the said licence was removed without increasing the licence fee and subject to the same terms and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial