Increaser - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increaser Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 220 results (0.007 seconds)Bakhshish Singh Dhaliwal Vs. the State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-31-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC752; 1967CriLJ656; (1967)69PLR107; [1967]1SCR211
..... of employees into the wage scales and flat or ad hoc increase of salaries of workmen wherever considered necessary nbsp in the ..... contend that the tribunal had only revised the wage scales by increasing the salary on entry into the service and restructuring the ..... scale of pay and never granted any ad hoc increase of salary to all employees therefore they filed an application before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Dayawati and anr. Vs. Inderjit and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-14-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1423; [1966]3SCR275
..... the circumstances then existing the notification of the central government increasing the price of sugar to enable the recoupment of the ..... prevailing conditions and circumstances had to be considered the notification increasing the home price of sugar could not be taken into ..... or the sugar control order which authorised the government to increase the price for the sake of recouping to the manufacturers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Kerala Vs. Ramaswami Iyer and Sons
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-11-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1738; [1966]61ITR187(SC); [1966]3SCR582; [1966]18STC1(SC)
..... and december 1947 and in november 1948 the government passed orders increasing the prices of sale on the dates on which those orders ..... on the day immediately preceding the coming into force of the increased price at the rate then obtaining and releasing the stocks to ..... keep the larger difference caused by the selling price having been increased after the procurement 582 e f h ii the question of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. Roopchand Seshmull
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-1966
Reported in: ILR1967KAR446; [1968]69ITR868(KAR); [1968]69ITR868(Karn); (1967)2MysLJ31
..... has to be seen that whether the change of sound system has increased the revenue or not admittedly the old sound system was in existence ..... a better sound system it cannot be said that the assessee has increased its income instead of repairing the old stereo system the assessee has ..... there is no change in the seating capacity of the theatre or increase in the tariff rate of the ticket it is a revenue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDalchand and ors. Vs. Delhi Improvement Trust (Now Delhi Development A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-24-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC87; [1966]SuppSCR27
..... central provinces municipalities act 1922 from 1936 in all 1941 the rate of tax was increased to 4 as in 1952 the appellant filed a suit for recovery of the excess .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO. Rm. M. Sp. Sv. Firm Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax-madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-14-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1061; [1967]63ITR404(SC); [1967]1SCR905
..... 26 8 1999 market value held ought to have been arrived at by giving cumulative increase of 7 5 per annum over the land rate awarded and reducing the resultant by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJamuna Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-22-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC553; 1967(0)BLJR289; 1967CriLJ541; [1967]1SCR469
..... of the act and the lifting of the ban cannot be so construed as to increase the jurisdiction of the tribunal under the relevant sections the lifting of the ban was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDurgacharan Naik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-23-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1775; 1966CriLJ1491; [1966]3SCR636
..... than advertised 112 posts were filled up legality and or validity thereof not questioned government increased number of vacancies from time to time having regard to emergent situation in state held .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.S. Shethna Vs. Vinubhai Harilal Panchal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-25-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1036; (1967)0GLR260; [1967]1SCR174
..... levy on the ground that it amounts to expropriation is wholly unfounded no doubt the increase in the rate of fee was large but considering the available seating capacity of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Pottery Works Vs. B.P. Sood, Controller of Mining Leases for I ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-03-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC964; [1967]1SCR695
..... levy on the ground that it amounts to expropriation is wholly unfounded no doubt the increase in the rate of fee was large but considering the available seating capacity of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial