Inconsistent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: inconsistent Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 307 results (0.023 seconds)Addanki Narayanappa and anr. Vs. Bhaskara Krishtappa and 13 ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1300; [1966]3SCR400
bepersonal and not real estate unless indeed such conversion is inconsistentwith the agreement between the parties although the decision upon this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.G. Khosla and Co. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-18-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1216; [1966]3SCR352; [1966]17STC473(SC)
..... of the appellate decree in his favour 450 e h 451 a it would be inconsistent to hold that an application for restitution would be an original petition if the appellate ..... for restitution and that it would be an execution application if it did such an inconsistency could be avoided if a direction for restitution were implied in every appellate decree setting .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHimatrao Vs. Jaikishandas and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-04-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1974; [1966]3SCR815
..... same was binding upon the delegates a delegate cannot take any action contrary to or inconsistent with the factors laid down for computation of disposal cost as defined in section 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabhu Vs. Ramdev and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1721; [1966]3SCR676
..... same was binding upon the delegates a delegate cannot take any action contrary to or inconsistent with the factors laid down for computation of disposal cost as defined in section 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPeriyasamy Vs. State of Madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-25-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1027; 1967CriLJ975; [1967]2SCR122
..... schedule seven to the government of india act 1935 6h 7a g there is no inconsistency between a receipt being a capital one under the company law and by fiction being .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.V. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. P.N. Venkatasubramania Iyer and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1247; [1966]3SCR208
..... should be free from the impact of the fundamental rights as there was no inherent inconsistency between arts 19 1 a and the second part of art 194 3 full effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKashi Nath Pal Vs. Umapada Pal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-24-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Cal83,71CWN321
..... consequently under article 13 1 that existing law became void to the extent of such inconsistency the impugned act continued in force even after the commencement of the constitution with respect ..... by the fundamental right the american authorities refer only to post constitution laws which were inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution such laws never came to life but were still .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBinani Properties Private Ltd. Vs. M. Gulamali Abdul HossaIn and Co. a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-10-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Cal390
..... notice fosters the contention that it keeps away the law of agency inconsistent as such law is with the law prescribed here and that ..... other section 13 6 covering another field a notice of suit what inconsistency can there be between an existing proposition in one plane and ..... fresh sub letting not fresh subletting fresh consent in vain an inconsistency is sought to be spelt out between clause 2 1 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerry Vs. Commerce Loan Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-07-1966
..... i through vii of the bankruptcy act insofar as they are not inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of chapter xiii apply in ..... 1 7 of this title shall insofar as they are not inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this chapter apply in ..... on this form of relief nobody would suggest that it is inconsistent with chapter xiii to withhold extension plan relief from those who .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDennis Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-1966
..... and competently cross examined on numerous other relevant judicial and extrajudicial statements without manifest inconsistency the court thought it safe to assume that the grand jury proceedings would not ..... or the responsibility of examining sometimes voluminous grand jury testimony in order to ascertain inconsistencies with trial testimony in any event it will be extremely difficult for even the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial