Inconsistent - Year 1950 - Judgments

Nov 20 1950 (SC)

Jeevantha and ors. Vs. Hanumantha and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-20-1950

Reported in: AIR1954SC9

..... owner has a right to use the joint property in a husband like manner not inconsistent with similar rights of other co owners 7 where a co owner is in possession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 1950 (SC)

Province of Bombay Vs. Kusaldas S. Advani and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-15-1950

Reported in: AIR1950SC222; (1951)53BOMLR1; (1950)IIMLJ703(SC); [1950]1SCR621

..... unbelievable how deceased who was driving was sitting on back seat was not explained many inconsistencies in his evidence held story put forth by prosecution and by eye witness doubtful and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 1950 (HC)

Prahalad Jena and ors. Vs. State

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Mar-03-1950

Reported in: AIR1950Ori157

..... the orisaa maintenance of public order act shall remain in full force despite the constitutional inconsistencies and repugnancies the rein for the maximum period of three months this in my opinion ..... code complete in itself after excising such provisions therefrom as are either expressly or impliedly inconsistent with the constitution and act upon it then the question arises whether such a course .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 1950 (HC)

Harpal Singh Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-17-1950

Reported in: AIR1950All562

..... commencement of this constitution became void to the extent of the inconsistency between them and the provisions of part in of the ..... decided according to its own opinion to say that a law inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution should be interpreted with ..... stated the provisions of section 123a criminal p c are also inconsistent with the provisions contained in clause 5 of article 22 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 1950 (HC)

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-11-1950

Reported in: AIR1951All257

..... consider whether the provisions of that act are in any way inconsistent with the provisions of part iii of the constitution and ..... central government or a provincial government is invalid as being inconsistent with article 11 of the constitution which lays down that ..... free movement throughout the territory of india and are also inconsistent with article 301 of the constitution mr pathak s argument .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1950 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Bose and ors. Vs. the Chief Secretary to the Government of ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-27-1950

Reported in: 54CWN394

..... but in our opinion this ordinance is void because it is inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution act the ordinance in section ..... the west bengal security ordinance 1949 is void as it is inconsistent with the constitution act 23 we shall now deal with ..... amendment act 1930 and the west bengal security ordinance 1949 are inconsistent with the provisions of part iii they became therefore void .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 1950 (HC)

Trimbak Shivrudra Vs. the State

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-13-1950

Reported in: AIR1950Bom203; 1950CriLJ1372

..... by any provision in the constitution even though it ia partly inconsistent with article 22 the relevant provision is article 372 of ..... only those provisions of the public safety act which are inconsistent with the provisions of part m have now become void ..... it follows therefore that those provisions which are not inconsistent with the constitution are not void 23 the provision which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 1950 (HC)

Piara Kishen Sadhu Ram Vs. the Crown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-29-1950

Reported in: 1951CriLJ886

..... irrelevant in the present case for we are not dealing with inconsistencies in the actual terms of competing statutes the order passed ..... the latter shall prevail the former shall to the extent of inconsistency be invalid latham c j observed as follows this section ..... law has superior authority takes effect to the exclusion of the inconsistent state law 12 the principle propounded by this decision has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1950 (HC)

Haqiqatullah Khan Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-07-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Raj69

..... any doubt or difficulty the reason is that its provisions are inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of article 22 4 of ..... order act of 1948 was justified in view of the apparent inconsistency between sections 2 3 4 of that act articles 13 22 ..... that the detention provisions in the bihar act of 1950 were inconsistent with the fundamental rights prescribed in article 22 constitution of india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1950 (HC)

Rama Chandra Misra Vs. President, District Board

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Aug-21-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Ori1; 17(1951)CLT10

..... only effected when the provisions of a later enactment are so inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of an earlier one that ..... that case the question for decision was whether there was an inconsistency between the education acts 1870 to 1902 on the one hand ..... duties they may for instance confer right and one statute is inconsistent with another when it takes away a right conferred by that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Inconsistent - Judgment Search Results