Court : Karnataka
..... ; 3. meena lakhotia vs. state of karnataka & others36; 4. aane mines and minerals vs. state of karnataka37; 5. j.k.cement (western) limited vs. the state of karnataka and others38 respondent s contentions 16. per contra, learned central government counsel and learned additional government advocate for the respondents would reiterate ..... sedam (shettihuda) village, sedam taluk, kalaburgi district, karnataka in a time bound and expeditious manner and etc. in w.p.no.5973 of2021between: shree cement limited having its registered office at bangur nagar, post box no.33 beawar-305 901 dist ajmer (rajasthan) represented by its authorized representative / power of attorney mr. ..... grant prior approval for the application dated0610/2008 of the petitioner herein and etc. in w.p.no.8807 of2020between: dalmia cement (bharat) limited having its registered office at dalmiapuram district tiruchirapali tamil nadu-621 651 and also having its corporate office at11h floor, hansalaya building15 barakhamba road new .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... supplies. sion; lines extended and completed subject presidents, lincoln, order of may 25, telegraph act of 1862, 12 stat. 334). to limitations of joint resolution of 1862. july 14, 1862, 12 stat. 625; interruption of regular passenger and freight traffic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- world war i ..... of military communications. censorship of messages; lines extended and richardson, messages and papers of the 12 stat. 334). completed subject to limitations of joint resolution of july 14, 1862, 12 stat. 625. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- railroads. 5/25/62 8/8/65 order of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... arbitral awards 27-28 (1958). [ footnote 2/35 ] for example, the cour de cassation in belgium has held that disputes arising under a belgian statute limiting the unilateral termination of exclusive distributorships are not arbitrable under the convention in that country, audi-nsu auto union a. g. v. s. a. adelin petit ..... of the proper forum for resolving this dispute. like any other mechanism for resolving controversies, international arbitration will only succeed if it is realistically limited to tasks it is capable of performing well -- the prompt and inexpensive resolution of essentially contractual disputes between commercial partners. as for matters involving ..... on certiorari to the same court. [ footnote 1 ] the reasons advanced included concerns that such diversion would interfere with the japanese trade policy of voluntarily limiting imports to the united states, app. 143, 177-178; that the soler-ordered vehicles would be unsuitable for use in certain proposed destinations because of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... the state-national balance. in the absence of a clear statement of congressional design, for example, we have refused to interpret ambiguous federal statutes to limit fundamental state legislative prerogatives, gregory v. ashcroft, supra, at 460-464, our understanding being that such prerogatives, through which "a state defines itself ..... (striking protection of labor union membership as outside "commerce"). these restrictive views of commerce subject to congressional power complemented the court's activism in limiting the enforceable scope of state economic regulation. it is most familiar history that during this same period the court routinely invalidated state social and economic ..... only if the statutory language leaves no reasonable alternative"). unlike the statute in bass, 922(q) has no express jurisdictional element which might limit its reach to a discrete set of firearm possessions that additionally have an explicit connection with or effect on interstate commerce. although as part .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... defining licensing so broadly, by bringing nearly all businesses within its scope, arizona s statute creates these effects statewide. why would congress, after deliberately limiting ordinary penalties to the range of a few thousand dollars per illegal worker, want to permit far more drastic state penalties that would directly and ..... whether a person has employed an unauthorized alien. post , at 2 (dissenting opinion). while justice breyer would add language to the statute narrowly limiting the phrase licensing and similar laws to specific types of licenses, justice sotomayor creates an entirely new statutory requirement: she would allow states to ..... an irca adjudication because congress, when enacting irca, eliminated unauthorized worker prohibitions and associated adjudication procedures in another federal statute. but no such limits are even remotely discernible in the statutory text. the chamber s reliance on irca s legislative history to bolster its textual and structural arguments .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... ," has been held inadequate to establish the requisite knowledge. see 959 the nation's legislators chose to place under a registration requirement only a very limited class of firearms, those they considered especially dangerous. the generally "dangerous" character of all guns, the court therefore observes, ante, at 611-612 ..... crane, j., concurring) (arguing that imprisonment for a crime that requires no mens rea would stretch the law regarding acts mala prohibita beyond its limitations)p similarly, commentators collecting the early cases have argued that offenses punishable by imprisonment cannot be understood to be public welfare offenses, but must require ..... at 280-281. see also morissette, supra, at 252-256. such public welfare offenses have been created by congress, and recognized by this court, in "limited circumstances." united states gypsum, supra, at 437. typically, our cases recognizing such offenses involve statutes that regulate potentially harmful or injurious items. cf. united .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... uncontaminated solid waste consisting of vegetation resulting from land clearing and grubbing, utility line maintenance and seasonal and storm related cleanup. such waste includes, but is not limited to bricks, concrete and other masonry materials, soil, rock, wood, wall coverings, plaster, drywall, plumbing fixtures, non-asbestos insulation, roofing shingles, asphaltic ..... town of clarkstown or recycling centers established by special permit pursuant to chapter 106 of the clarkstown town code by any person, including, without limitation, any licensed carter or any municipality. failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall be subject to the provisions with respect to ..... factor unrelated to economic protectionism." new energy co. of ind. v. limbach, 486 u. s. 269 , 273-274 (1988) (citations omitted). this limitation on the state and local power has been seen implicit in the commerce clause because, as the majority recognizes, the framers sought to dampen regional jealousies in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... nor was it certain at the time of settlement. but that uncertainty makes no difference. it was certain that the insurance policies' value was limited. and that limitation was created by the likelihood of an independent judicial determination of the meaning of words in the policy, in respect to which the merits or ..... tort victims at law. even if we assume that some such tension is acceptable under the rules enabling act, it is best kept within tolerable limits by keeping limited fund practice under rule 23(b)(1)(b) close to the practice preceding its adoption. finally, if we needed further counsel against adventurous application ..... all those with claims unsatisfied at the time of the settlement negotiations, with intraclass conflicts addressed by recognizing independently represented subclasses. in this case, the limit of the fund was determined by treating the settlement agreement as dispositive, an error magnified by the representation of class members by counsel also representing excluded .....
Tag this Judgment!