Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: inchek tyres limited and national rubber manufacturers limited nationalisation act 1984 section 27 penalties Court: customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal cestat delhi Page 1 of about 3 results (0.567 seconds)

May 20 1986 (TRI)

Tyre Corporation of India Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1986)(9)ECC5

..... schedule to the act; (d) accordingly, no recovery can be effected from the appellant of any amount claimed towards revenue actually due to be paid by m/s. inchek tyres ltd.; (e) the adjudicating officer had hardly considered this plea raised by the appellant in the adjudication order.4. in the premises, we allow the appeal and set ..... b) in terms of section 18 of the said act, every person having a claim against m/s. inchek tyres ltd. with regard to any of the matters specified in the second schedule to the act, has to prefer such claim before the commissioner of payments appointed under the provisions ..... aforesaid act and more specifically sections 3 and 5 thereof and notification no. so 149(e) dated 5.3.1984, the right, title and interest of m/s. inchek tyres ltd. in the undertaking had vested initially in the central government and finally in the appellant, free from all encumbrances and liabilities with effect from. 14.2.1984; ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1989 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1990)(25)ECC315

..... reclor capsules, resteclin capsules and resteclin tablets was a pharmaceutical necessity and therefore, he obtained the report from the deputy chief chemist only on the limited issue as to whether the ascorbic acid and lidocaine hydrochloride-(synonymous with lignocaine hydrochloride) a local anaesthetic are therapeutically inert. the said report of the ..... also agrees (see his referring order) and therefore, he has agreed with the majority that the claim of the other appellants m/s.wanders limited, bombay that the addition of vit. b6 chemically described as pyridoxine hydrochloride and not specially mentioned in the notification as pharmaceutical necessity, in isobenzacyl ..... blamed for not declaring the name of the buffering agent or stabilizing agent on the labels of all the medicines.m/s. wander india limited have manufactured iso benzacyl forte according to india pharmacopoeia. isoniazid and pyridoxine hydrochloride are two ingredients of this medicine. in the indian pharmacopoeia, there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1998 (TRI)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC591

..... pack price to consumers generally prevailing in the country as per the enclosure. the letter cautioned that the six categories will not accurately reflect deviations which are limited to certain segments, namely, bombay, calcutta, pune (all due to retailers' association) or gujarat (high octroi) etc. or deviations caused regionally by competitors ..... declared on the package with reference to retail sale price mentioned in the declaration submitted to the collector. the approval contemplated was of this limited nature.approval of printed price after examining the cost data and market considerations would be a very complicated and time-consuming impractical exercise and such ..... calculated and annexing a chart known as "ddc chart".7. the various concerns and individuals resisted the notice on merits and on the ground of limitation. the adjudicating authority overruled these contentions and confirmed the demand and imposed penalties as indicated in para 2 above, but did not order confiscation .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //