Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: inchek tyres limited and national rubber manufacturers limited nationalisation act 1984 section 27 penalties Page 5 of about 58 results (0.151 seconds)

Dec 19 1994 (HC)

The Registrar, University of Madras, Chepauk, Madras - 600005 and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)IIMLJ367

..... sugars ltd., a company registered under the companies act. the company had to face certain problems and the government of tamil nadu intervened by passing an act called madura sugar limited (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) act, 1984 (tamil nadu act 18 of 1984). under section 15 of the act, a commissioner was appointed for payment of amounts payable under section ..... 18-3-1993) is per incuriam. we are distressed to note that the state commission has chosen to characterise the decision of an appellate authority as per incuriam, overlooking the limits of its jurisdiction. the state commission has also thrown to winds the principles of judicial propriety. a full bench of this court, to which one of us is a party .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2012 (HC)

M/S. Dhariwal Industries Limited and Others Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

..... frontiers. the court cannot reweigh and substitute its notion of expedient solution. constitutionality not chemistry, abuse not error, is our concern and the executive has not transgressed limits at all here. within the wide judge-proof areas of policy and judgment open to the government, if they make mistakes, correction is not in court but ..... clause (a) of sub-section (2) thereafter confers power upon the food authority to specify the standards and guidelines in relation to articles of food and the limits for use of food additives. chapter iii of the act contains general principles of food safety and requires the central government, the state government, the food authority ..... tobacco products to indicate on the baggage or on its label, the nicotine and tar contents on all the concerned tobacco product alongwith the maximum permissible limits thereof. it is submitted that the supreme court in ghodawat judgment has specifically held that the act of 2003 is a special act and that the pfa act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2003 (HC)

Gvk Industries Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD676

..... occasions when additional gas becomes available on temporary/short term basis. during such period if it becomes possible, gail may consider within the permissible limit, to supply additional quantity of gas for shorter duration on days when such additional gas is available over and above the existing maximum contracted ..... particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept............................. 44. in ghaziabad development authority v. delhi auto and general finance private limited, : [1994]3scr248 , after referring to f.c.i, v. kamdhenu cattle feed industries (supra), the apex court observed as under:...................... the basic ..... recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. it follows that the concept of legitimate expectation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1985 (HC)

A.P. Shah and ors. Vs. B.M. Institute of Mental Health, Ahmedabad Thro ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)2GLR910

..... and appropriate directions being granted by the competent authority under the relevant statutes pertaining to public trust. we have, therefore, examined the problem only from this limited angle as to whether the institute has been able to prima facie make good this reason of insurmountable financial difficulty. it was urged by workers that if ..... tribunal is under an obligation to give an opportunity to the employer to cite additional evidence justifying his action. this legal position is beyond dispute (see: firestone tyre and rubber company's case - supra). by section 11 a, the tribunal is now empowered to alter the punishment imposed by the employer which power the tribunal ..... misconduct is not justified. in other words, the proved misconduct may not merit the extreme punishment and the tribunal can award a lesser punishment (see: firestone tyre and rubber company's case - supra) it is a trite position in law that a tribunal or an arbitrator has no jurisdiction to sit in judgment over .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2022 (HC)

Shree Cement Limited Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... ; 3. meena lakhotia vs. state of karnataka & others36; 4. aane mines and minerals vs. state of karnataka37; 5. j.k.cement (western) limited vs. the state of karnataka and others38 respondent s contentions 16. per contra, learned central government counsel and learned additional government advocate for the respondents would reiterate ..... sedam (shettihuda) village, sedam taluk, kalaburgi district, karnataka in a time bound and expeditious manner and etc. in w.p.no.5973 of2021between: shree cement limited having its registered office at bangur nagar, post box no.33 beawar-305 901 dist ajmer (rajasthan) represented by its authorized representative / power of attorney mr. ..... grant prior approval for the application dated0610/2008 of the petitioner herein and etc. in w.p.no.8807 of2020between: dalmia cement (bharat) limited having its registered office at dalmiapuram district tiruchirapali tamil nadu-621 651 and also having its corporate office at11h floor, hansalaya building15 barakhamba road new .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2022 (HC)

Shree Cement Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... ; 3. meena lakhotia vs. state of karnataka & others36; 4. aane mines and minerals vs. state of karnataka37; 5. j.k.cement (western) limited vs. the state of karnataka and others38 respondent s contentions 16. per contra, learned central government counsel and learned additional government advocate for the respondents would reiterate ..... sedam (shettihuda) village, sedam taluk, kalaburgi district, karnataka in a time bound and expeditious manner and etc. in w.p.no.5973 of2021between: shree cement limited having its registered office at bangur nagar, post box no.33 beawar-305 901 dist ajmer (rajasthan) represented by its authorized representative / power of attorney mr. ..... grant prior approval for the application dated0610/2008 of the petitioner herein and etc. in w.p.no.8807 of2020between: dalmia cement (bharat) limited having its registered office at dalmiapuram district tiruchirapali tamil nadu-621 651 and also having its corporate office at11h floor, hansalaya building15 barakhamba road new .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2022 (HC)

Dalmia Cement (bharat) Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... ; 3. meena lakhotia vs. state of karnataka & others36; 4. aane mines and minerals vs. state of karnataka37; 5. j.k.cement (western) limited vs. the state of karnataka and others38 respondent s contentions 16. per contra, learned central government counsel and learned additional government advocate for the respondents would reiterate ..... sedam (shettihuda) village, sedam taluk, kalaburgi district, karnataka in a time bound and expeditious manner and etc. in w.p.no.5973 of2021between: shree cement limited having its registered office at bangur nagar, post box no.33 beawar-305 901 dist ajmer (rajasthan) represented by its authorized representative / power of attorney mr. ..... grant prior approval for the application dated0610/2008 of the petitioner herein and etc. in w.p.no.8807 of2020between: dalmia cement (bharat) limited having its registered office at dalmiapuram district tiruchirapali tamil nadu-621 651 and also having its corporate office at11h floor, hansalaya building15 barakhamba road new .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2012 (FN)

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that defy judicial calculation. see baker v. carr, 369 u. s. 186, 217 (1962) . even commentators sympathetic to robust enforcement of dole s limitations, see supra, at 46, have concluded that conceptions of impermissible coercion premised on states perceived inability to decline federal funds are just too amorphous to be ..... current health status, adversely affect the price of health care and health insurance. see supra, at 6 7. moreover, an insurance-purchase requirement limited to those in need of immediate care simply could not work. insurance companies would either charge these individuals prohibitively expensive premiums, or, if community ..... companies significantly more than those without such conditions, insurers routinely re- fused to insure these individuals, charged them substantially higher premiums, or offered only limited coverage that did not include the preexisting illness. see dept. of health and human services, coverage denied: how the current health insurance system leaves .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1989 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1990)(25)ECC315

..... reclor capsules, resteclin capsules and resteclin tablets was a pharmaceutical necessity and therefore, he obtained the report from the deputy chief chemist only on the limited issue as to whether the ascorbic acid and lidocaine hydrochloride-(synonymous with lignocaine hydrochloride) a local anaesthetic are therapeutically inert. the said report of the ..... also agrees (see his referring order) and therefore, he has agreed with the majority that the claim of the other appellants m/s.wanders limited, bombay that the addition of vit. b6 chemically described as pyridoxine hydrochloride and not specially mentioned in the notification as pharmaceutical necessity, in isobenzacyl ..... blamed for not declaring the name of the buffering agent or stabilizing agent on the labels of all the medicines.m/s. wander india limited have manufactured iso benzacyl forte according to india pharmacopoeia. isoniazid and pyridoxine hydrochloride are two ingredients of this medicine. in the indian pharmacopoeia, there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1984 (FN)

Sony Corp. Vs. Universal City Studios

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . see 1975 house hearings 113 (testimony of barbara ringer, register of copyrights) (1971 amendment "created a copyright in a sound recording . . . but limited it to the particular situation of so-called piracy"); id. at 1380 (letter from john lorenz, acting librarian of congress) (under 1971 amendment "only the ..... videodiscs. some works are suitable for exploitation through all of these avenues, while the market for other works is more limited. petitioner sony manufactures millions of betamax videotape recorders and markets these devices through numerous retail establishments, some of which are also petitioners in this action. ..... they can exploit their rights in these works in a number of ways: page 464 u. s. 422 by authorizing theatrical exhibitions, by licensing limited showings on cable and network television, by selling syndication rights for repeated airings on local television stations, and by marketing programs on prerecorded videotapes or .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //