Inalienability - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: inalienability Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 172 results (0.007 seconds)Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. G.T. Agencies
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-30-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR496
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSingla Rice Mills Vs. Market Committee and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR550
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGram Panchayat Vs. Choe Reclamation Society and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-15-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR784
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManish and ors. Vs. Smt. Kailash Devi and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-13-2008
Reported in: (2008)152PLR78
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhan Raj and anr. Vs. Sat Pal and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-24-2008
Reported in: (2008)152PLR65
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSukhchaIn Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR711
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunita Rani Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-08-2008
Reported in: (2008)152PLR56
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagwan Sarup and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR374
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdamba Tea Factory and ors. Vs. Parshotam Kishan
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR388
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBirla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Keshav Lal and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-2008
Reported in: (2008)151PLR481
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial