Skip to content


Inalienability - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: inalienability Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.008 seconds)
Jan 25 1978 (SC)

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... the most valuable this article of the constitution therefore makes the right fundamental but the inalienable right is curtailed by a murderer s conduct as viewed under law the deprivation ..... we speak of deprivations or restrictions which are really impediments to the exercise of the inalienable rights such deprivations or restrictions or regulations of rights may take place within prescribed limits .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1978 (SC)

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-21-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC548; [1978(36)FLR266]; (1978)ILLJ349SC; (1978)IILLJ73SC; (1978)2SCC213; [1978]3SCR207; 1978LabIC467(SC)

..... been pithily described by lord watson as the primary and inalienable functions of a constitutional government could be stated negatively as ..... activities undertaken by the government in the exercise of its inalienable functions under the constitution call it regal sovereign or by ..... other by the state itself in the exercise of its inalienable functions if the water supply and sew erage schemes or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 1978 (HC)

K.R.B. Kaimal and anr. Vs. Director of Postal Services

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-06-1978

Reported in: (1979)ILLJ176Ker

..... cannot be included although what such functions are has been optly termed the primary and inalienable functions of a constitutional government in regard to the words analogous to the carrying ..... which pertains to private or personal employment 3 the regal functions described as primary and inalienable functions of state though statutorily delegated to a corporation are necessarily excluded from the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 1978 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty, Karnataka Vs. Raghavendra Purnaiya

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-11-1978

Reported in: [1980]126ITR185(KAR); [1980]126ITR185(Karn)

..... enact as follows 3 section 2 1 of the act provided that the jahgirdar was inalienable and impartible it further provided that it was not competent for the jahgirdar of yelandur ..... doubt true that under s 3 of the act the jahgirdar had been declared as inalienable and importable and the act provided for recognising only one person belonging to the family .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1978 (HC)

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board represented by Its Secretary Vs. M. Ebrahim ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-27-1978

Reported in: (1979)1MLJ189

..... gifts by a private person to remote unborn generations of descendants successions that is of inalienable life interests are forbidden and whether it is to be taken that the very sanie ..... public wakf or a private wakf the property is vested in the almighty it is inalienable and non heritable and therefore steps for the purpose of preserving this character of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 1978 (HC)

Subhash Chander and Co. Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-05-1978

Reported in: [1979]44STC331(P& H)

..... right there is nothing whatsoever in the constitution which may even remotely vest any such inalienable right in the citizens mr dogra was compelled to concede that the right of appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 1978 (HC)

Chand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-18-1978

Reported in: AIR1979P& H19

..... right there is nothing whatsoever in the constitution which may even remotely vest any such inalienable right in the citizens indeed learned counsel for the petitioners were compelled to concede that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1978 (SC)

Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-17-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC1548; 1978CriLJ1678; (1978)3SCC544; [1979]1SCR192; 1978(10)LC847(SC)

..... accusers without a lawyer to assist him 17 the philosophy of legal aid as an inalienable element of fair procedure is evident from mr justice brennan s well known words nothing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 1978 (SC)

Rajendra Singh Yadav Vs. Chandra Sen and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-26-1978

Reported in: AIR1979SC882; (1979)4SCC111; 1978(10)LC862(SC)

..... case was opened at the preliminary hearing counsel for the appellants contended that as an inalienable incident of a statutory appeal his clients were entitled to a full fledged hearing after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1978 (HC)

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Sub-collector Vs. Mut ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-26-1978

Reported in: (1979)1MLJ197

..... per mensem as maintenance for her life the 4th claimant contended that the lands were inalienable and as such they cannot be acquired and that the entire compensation should be deposited .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //