Impugnation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: impugnation Page 1 of about 17 results (0.025 seconds)i) the Impugned Fir No.28/2010 Dt.29/1/2010 (Annexure P3) Is Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
of aforesaid reasons, the instant petition is accepted. Consequently, the impugned FIR (Annexure P3) and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChallenging the Impugned Award the Appellants Have Took Vs. Smt. Malda ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
facts are taken from RFA No.1219 of 1997.6. Challenging the impugned Award, the appellants have took up a stand that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Impugned Order Dated 9.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) Is Set Vs. State of H ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Singh Sahrawat's case (supra).The matter, accordingly, does require reconsideration. The impugned order dated 9.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) is set aside. The D.E.O.,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlso the Impugned Interim Order Dated 23.07.2013 Passed in Vs. Nirmola ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
of this order Chandigarh CWP No.16178 of 2013 [2].also the impugned interim order dated 23.07.2013 passed in OA No.1033/PB/2013. We wish
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Petitioners Impugn the Notifications Dated Vs. Gyasi Ram and Other ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
of this order Chandigarh CWP No.506 of 2014 [2].The petitioners impugn the notifications dated 11.02.2011 (Annexure P-5) and 10.02.2012 (Annexure P-9)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Petitioner Impugns the Acquisition of His Land Vs. Surinder Kumar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
of this order Chandigarh CWP No.3433 of 2014 [2].The petitioner impugns the acquisition of his land comprised in KhaSr.No.19//23/1 (1-11).situated within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated Vs. Krishna Devi .....P ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
of this order Chandigarh CWP No.13541 of 2014 [2].The petitioner impugns the notifications dated 18.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) and 17.12.2009 (Annexure P-2)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“a Combined Reading of the Impugned Orders Would Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
came to the following conclusion: A combined reading of the impugned orders would show that right from Naib Tehsildar, Sub Divisional
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrayer Is for Setting Aside the Impugned Order. Rate of Rent Vs. Rames ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
is nothing wrong on facts or in law in the impugned order. Even if payments allegedly made in cash are proved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“The Management Is Before This Court Impugning the Award Vs. Uttar H ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
dismissed on 23.8.2012. It was observed as under in the impugned order :- The management is before this court impugning the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>