Importable - Judgment Search Results

Universal Imports Agency and anr. Vs. the Chief Controller of Imports ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC41; [1961]1SCR305

import commencing from the date of the application forpermission to import and ending with the crossing of the customs barrier inIndia.

French India Importing Corporation, Delhi Vs. the Chief Controller of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC1752; 1983LC2169D(SC); [1962]2SCR410

of goods into India, but also the entire process of Import commencing from the date of the application for permission to

Agya Import Limited vs.joint Commissioner of Customs (Siib-Import),icd ...

Court: Delhi

as per the writ petition, was arrested in connection with import of similar goods, which had been seized by the Special

Didwania Import and Export (P) Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(38)ELT531Tri(Mum.)bai

held that the licences were not valid because the goods imported were covered by Appendix 6 entry No. 1. The collector,

Bacchus Imports, Ltd. Vs. Dias

Court: US Supreme Court

of absolute exclusion, subject the foreign article to a heavy importation fee?" 299 U.S. at 299 U. S. 62 -63. Today

Glass Chatons Importers and Users' Association Vs. Union of India (UOi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC1514; [1962]1SCR862

to be mentioned at once that the periods of the import permit 'already granted' as referred to in the petition has

Aarkeyess Imports Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(17)LC52Tri(Delhi)

separately under Headings 87.01 and 87.07. On the ground of Import Licence not being valid, the Additional Collector ordered confiscation of

General Import Company (India) Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1989)(20)LC112Tri(Mum.)bai

II of List 8, and therefore the same cannot be imported for stock and sale. As stated earlier, the Department had

C.C. (import) Vs. Titex India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(101)ECC10

Gunther and Co. GmbH Germany. The Indian Company has also imported capital goods and machinery from their collaborators and associate companies.

Neelam Imports Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

not in the category of prohibited goods. They are freely importable on payment of customs duty. Whatever customs duty is payable,