Impliedly - Judgment Search Results

i.C. Golak Nath and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC1643; 1967(0)BLJR818; [1967]2SCR762

amending power is limited expressly by art 13 2 and impliedly by the language of art 368 and other articles as

Chandra Mohan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1969All230

does not confer the power of amendment either expressly or impliedly the power vests in parliament by reason of articles 245

Afroyim Vs. Rusk

Court: US Supreme Court

afroyim v rusk 387 u s 253 1967 u s supreme court afroyim v rusk 387 u s 253 1967...

Shiv Nath, Minor Under Guardian Sahu Girdhar Lal Vs. Shri Ram Bharosey ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1969All333

will is determinable by either party on his expressly or impliedly intimating to the other his wish that the tenancy should

S. Zoiraster and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi, Ajmer, Raj ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1968]68ITR770(Delhi)

..... he argues that in the absence of any agreement express or implied to the contrary a payment by a negtoiable instrument is ..... of that case its further conclusion was that the assessed had impliedly consented to the sending of the cheques through post this ..... consideration time the court drew the inference that the assessed had impliedly authorised the government of india to send the cheques in question .....

Hukum Singh Nadir Singh Vs. Hakumat Rai Nihal Chand

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1968P& H110

on their basis to the effect that it has been impliedly held in amir chand s case sa no 420 of

Thankappan (P.K.) Vs. Vidhyarambham Press and Book Depot and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1969)ILLJ323Ker

..... of the same there was no kind of agreement either express or implied where under the plaintiff had either surrendered or assigned to the ..... the manuscript to them for publication must be taken to have impliedly covenanted to transfer the copyright also to them it is further ..... defendants must be held to have been subject to such an implied term so that any publication in breach thereof will not be .....

New Cotton and Wool Pressing Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, R ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1967]65ITR662(Raj)

d s dave c j this is a reference by the income tax appellate tribunal delhi bench under section 66...

Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. City Magistrate and ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1968)IILLJ21All

satish chandra j 1 the state electricity board prays that the order of the additional district judge and the prescribed...

Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

crown coat front co inc v united states 386 u s 503 1967 u s supreme court crown coat front...