Impliedly - Judgment Search Results

Vinodchandra Hiralal Gandhi Vs. Vivekanand Mills Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1965)6GLR889

p n bhagwati j 1 a very short question arises in this appeal namely how far a negative stipulation can...

Jageshar Naik Vs. Collector of Jaunpur

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1966All392

desai c j 1 4 a report made by the chief inspector of stamps in this first appeal has been...

Mangalathachi Vs. K.R. Kalyanasundara Mudaliar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ49

p s kailasam j 1 the plaintiff is the appellant she executed a mortgage bond in respect of a land...

R. Veerayya and M. Siddalingaiah and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1967AP265

he can point to some statutory provisions which expressly or impliedly permits him to do so to point to a provision

Babulall Choukhani Vs. Caltex (India) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1967Cal205,71CWN458

..... business and therefore dissented from in kalwani s case air1960cal430 is impliedly approved by the supreme court in ladulal s case 1964 3scr624 ..... in pragdas mathuradas v jeewanlal 1929 ltd the court oughtnot to imply a term merely because it would be a reasonable term to ..... would have made the contract unless this term was included i imply the term because both babulall and caltex had thought about it .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Hirendra Nath Banerjee

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1967Cal285

sinha j 1 this is an appeal from an order of basu j dated 5th march 1965 whereby ha made...

Lachman Das and ors. Vs. Heera Lal

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1966All323

dwivedi j 1 it is a defendant s appeal against the decree of the lower appellate court it was first...

K.S. Venkataraman and Co. Vs. State of Madras

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1089; [1966]60ITR112(SC); [1966]2SCR229; [1966]17STC418(SC)

..... ranganadham chetty contended that the entire reasoning of the privy council was either expressly or impliedly accepted by the said decisions the judicial committee in commissioner of i t punjab north ..... statute itself the other restrictions to which we have already referred are restrictions which are implied by the constitutional limitations but on that account there is no real difference between the .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Hirendra Nath Banerjee

Court: Kolkata

d n sinha j 1 this is an appeal from an order of basu j dated 5 march 1965 whereby...

Griswold Vs. Connecticut

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is incorporated in the fourteenth amendment and i do not mean to imply that the ninth amendment is applied against the states by the fourteenth ..... page 381 u s 521 of the constitution which either expressly or impliedly vests power in this court to sit as a supervisory agency ..... of the well known maxim that an affirmation in particular cases implies a negation in all others and e converso that a negation .....