Implicatively - Judgment Search Results

Chandradhar Goswami and ors. Vs. the Gauhati Bank Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC1058; [1967]37CompCas108(SC); [1967]1SCR898a

..... would abide by the decision of the government the government of bombay after considering the implications of the tharao decided that the order was mala fide and cancelled it on 8th ..... of the rights which were not previously granted and does not either expressly or by implication seek to lay down any binding rule of conduct the impugned order was not a .....

Chief Conservator of Forests and ors. Vs. Rattan Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC166; 1966MhLJ905(SC); [1966]SuppSCR158

..... to make bye laws so as to operate on subsisting contracts followed as a necessary implication from the terms of s 11 there was no contra indication in the other provisions ..... any such power evey if it was permissible to inter such a power by necessary implication it could not be inferred in the present case it could not be said that .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. the Metal Corporation of India Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC637; [1967]1CompCas37(SC); [1967]1SCR255

..... ground to affect credibility of witness foundation has to be laid if plea of false implication is raised indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 deceased alleged to have been assaulted .....

The Barium Chemicals Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Company Law Board and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC295; [1966]36CompCas639(SC); [1967]1SCR898; [1966]SuppSCR311

..... of construction subdelegation can be sustained if permitted by an express provision or by necessary implication where as here what is sub delegated is an administrative power and control over its .....

Syndicate Bank Staff Association (by Its General Secretary) Vs. Region ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1968)IILLJ712AP

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Lakshmi Ganesh Rice Mill Vs. Board of Revenue (C.T.)

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1968]22STC506(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Tirupathi Cotton Mills, Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1968)IILLJ723AP

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

K.M.S. Lakshmanier and Sons (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Sales Tax Appellate Trib ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1967]20STC103(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

K.S. Papanna and anr. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1967]19STC506(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Evans Vs. Newton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state courts that aid private parties to perform that public function on a segregated basis implicate the state in conduct proscribed by the fourteenth amendment like the streets of the company ..... perform that public function mass recreation through the use of parks on a segregated basis implicate the state in conduct proscribed by the fourteenth amendment quite evidently is oblique reliance on .....