Implicatively - Year 1964 - Judgments

Mar 16 1964 (SC)

Haridas Das and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-16-1964

Reported in: AIR1964SC1773; [1964]7SCR237

..... to make bye laws so as to operate on subsisting contracts followed as a necessary implication from the terms of s 11 there was no contra indication in the other provisions ..... any such power evey if it was permissible to inter such a power by necessary implication it could not be inferred in the present case it could not be said that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1964 (SC)

ibrahim Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-24-1964

Reported in: AIR1965SC618; 1965CriLJ506; [1964]4SCR441

..... in the industrial dispute referred to by the central government which has an all india implication individual workman cannot be made parties to a reference all of them are not expected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 1964 (SC)

Ramkarandas Radhavallabh Vs. Bhagwandas Dwarkadas

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-20-1964

Reported in: AIR1965SC1144; (1965)67BOMLR779; 1965MPLJ1005(SC); [1965]2SCR186

..... eye witness is related to deceased her evidence cannot be disregarded she would not falsely implicate merely because accused were set free by court in case of killing of her other .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 1964 (SC)

Penu Balakrishna Iyer and ors. Vs. Ariya M. Ramaswami Iyer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-06-1964

Reported in: AIR1965SC195; [1964]7SCR49

..... protect the tenants against any contractual engagements which may have been made expressly or by implication to deprive themselves wholly or partially of the protection intended to be conferred by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1964 (SC)

Anup Singh Vs. Shri Abdul Ghani and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-14-1964

Reported in: AIR1965SC815; (1965)0PLR593; [1965]1SCR38

..... a suit must therefore be laid down by a statute either expressly or by necessary implication an employee charged with grave acts of misconduct must be held to be entitled to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1964 (SC)

Basant Kumar Sarkar and ors. Vs. Eagle Rolling Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-1964

Reported in: AIR1964SC1260; [1964(8)FLR334]; (1964)IILLJ105SC; [1964]6SCR913

..... arising out of land dispute between deceased and other accused dying declaration made by deceased implicating appellant no material to show that it was result or product of imagination tutoring or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1964 (SC)

Balmukand Vs. Dist. Magistrate, Delhi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-17-1964

Reported in: AIR1965SC877; 1965CriLJ4; [1965]1SCR58

..... him which is not expressly qualified by reference to sub s 4 nor does any implication arise from the context which would suggest that it has a limited content ii the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 1964 (HC)

Shafeeq Shameem and Co. and anr. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-10-1964

Reported in: [1964]15STC828(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 1964 (HC)

Radhakrishna and Co. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-17-1964

Reported in: [1966]17STC128(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 1964 (HC)

Shrikishen Dhoot and ors. Vs. S.D. Kamlapurkur and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-10-1964

Reported in: [1965]35CompCas913(AP)

..... is nothing in the provisions of the amendment act which either expressly or by necessary implication suggests that the act is given retrospective operation section 32 c of the amendment act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Implicatively - Judgment Search Results