Implement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: implement Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 403 results (0.03 seconds)Mahesh Agriculture Implements and Forgings Ltd. Vs. Member, Industrial ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-04-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR809; 2005(2)BomCR625
..... and granted an interim stay in favour of the petitioner thereby the effect operation and implementation of the impugned orders passed by the industrial court and the labour court has been ..... april 1992 this writ petition has been admitted and interim stay of operation effect and implementation of the order dated 26 9 1991 passed by labour court has been granted it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShivagrico Implements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2004
Reported in: (2005)(179)ELT573TriDel
1 this appeal has been preferred against the impugned order in appeal vide which the commissioner appeals has enhanced the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659
..... choices prioritizing developmental areas executing the policy initiating the budget or even in implementing the local works in substantial and critical areas of predominantly local interests and ..... as an instrument of constitutional guidance for making laws devolving powers and responsibilities regarding implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice which may be entrusted to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCellular Operators Association Vs. Department of
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Mar-29-2004
..... not challenged the interconnection regulations which regulations are statutory and which prescribed the date of implementation of retention of 5 passed through revenue by cellular operators as 31 1 2001 ..... and pragmatic interpretation to the interconnection regulations when schedule ii talks of date of implementation by 31st january 2002 that could at best mean where the passed through revenue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorton Vs. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-2004
..... s c 251 d 1 which required the federal communications commission to establish regulations to implement interconnection requirements w ithin 6 months of the date of enactment of the telecommunications act ..... the regulation defining a land use plan declares that a plan is not a final implementation decision on actions which require further specific plans process steps or decisions under specific .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDepartment of Transportation Vs. Public Citizen
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-2004
..... carrier for authority to operate in the interior of the united states until fmcsa implemented specific application and safety monitoring requirements for mexican carriers some of these requirements ..... any funds to process or review any applications by mexican motor carriers until fmcsa implemented a variety of specific application and safety monitoring requirements for mexican carriers this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVedire Venkata Reddy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-17-2004
Reported in: AIR2005AP155; 2005(1)ALD325
..... it will be totally impermissible for the state of andhra pradesh to proceed ahead in implementing the project without getting appropriate clearance as is envisaged under the environment protection act ..... view of what has been discussed above holding that action of the state government in implementation of the project without obtaining environmental clearance as envisaged under the provisions of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUrban Development Authority Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-13-2004
..... necessary only with a view to overcome the difficulty arising from the period stipulated for implementation of the scheme under section 27 in the circumstances therefore the period stipulated by ..... section 27 for substantial implementation of the scheme must necessarily be counted from the date the final declaration under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFrew Vs. Hawkins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-2004
..... welfare rights org v shapp 602 f 2d 1114 ca3 1979 modifying consent decree implementing pennsylvania s epsdt program in light of changed circumstances rufo rejected the idea that the ..... the concerns they express are legitimate ones if not limited to reasonable and necessary implementations of federal law remedies outlined in consent decrees involving state officeholders may improperly deprive future .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamkrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College and ors. Vs. Dr. Sant ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2004
Reported in: (2005)1CALLT176(HC),2005(2)CHN371
..... envisaged in article 30 1 the college authority is legally bound to implement the provisions of the act of 1975 and the act of ..... there is no defence available to the college authority to refuse implementation of the provisions of the act of 1975 and the act ..... 1979 and hence there cannot be any objection from any corner regarding implementation of those acts and statute in the case of this college .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial