Skip to content


Impermissible - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: impermissible Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 220 results (0.012 seconds)
Aug 17 1995 (TRI)

National Engg. Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-17-1995

Reported in: (1995)(80)ELT193TriDel

lesser and not higher excise duty observed it is then impermissbile for the respondents to so interpret the notification as to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1995 (SC)

U.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. I.B. Misra and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-18-1995

Reported in: [1995(70)FLR783]; JT1995(1)SC565; 1995LabIC1624; (1995)IILLJ63SC; 1995(1)SCALE255; 1995Supp(1)SCC589; [1995]1SCR368; 1995(2)SLJ118(SC); (1995)1UPLBEC606

..... date of the reorganization of the state of u p therefore it would be legally impermissible to say that now the area of operation of the state apex society is confined .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1995 (HC)

Rajesh Ahuja Vs. Manoj Mittal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-01-1995

Reported in: 60(1995)DLT101; 1995(34)DRJ661; (1995)111PLR61

..... subject to the payment of interest claim of interest in the summary suit is not impermissible order 37 rule 3 5 leave to defend in a suit for an amount due .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1995 (HC)

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. Vs. Cec Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-20-1995

Reported in: 1995(34)DRJ379

..... court passing the decree transferring it to two courts simultaneously for execution not illegal or impermissible the judgment debtor failing to aver the hardship or oppression suffered by it due to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1995 (SC)

Balu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-28-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC1943; 1995CriLJ3225

..... on citizens for services that state renders to itself and not tax payers is clearly impermissible it would be arbitrary and unjustifiable directions given to refund with interest puri has submitted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 1995 (SC)

Sanjay Kumar and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-31-1995

Reported in: AIR1996SC178; JT1995(6)SC364; 1995(5)SCALE128; (1995)6SCC99; [1995]Supp3SCR186; 1995(2)LC713(SC)

..... period longer than three months whether under parliamentary law or under state law would be impermissible without obtaining the opinion of the advisory board the language of cl 4 b posits .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 1995 (HC)

Secretary, Bangalore Turf Club Vs. Prakash Srivatsava

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-1995

Reported in: ILR1995KAR1566; 1995(2)KarLJ201

..... of leave where no resolution of law required or particularly in interim orders or applications impermissible the situations in which a high court will grant leave or certificate to appeal to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 1995 (HC)

Sri Vinayaka Agency and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-18-1995

Reported in: ILR1995KAR2853

..... held punishment imposed is not harsh or disproportionate interference with punishment without any reasons is impermissible undue sympathy and benevolence is uncalled for labour services domestic enquiry assistance by advocate workman .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 1995 (HC)

Sheelawanti and anr., Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-03-1995

Reported in: 1995IAD(Delhi)725; AIR1995Delhi212; 57(1995)DLT801; 1995(32)DRJ403

..... hire purchase basis dda issuing letters of demand on the basis of cash down payment impermissible demand quashed with direction to adhere to the earlier scheme of hire purchase and d .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 1995 (SC)

State of Punjab Vs. Gurdip Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-05-1995

Reported in: 1996(1)ALD(Cri)916; (1996)2CALLT5(SC); 1995(7)SCALE312; (1996)7SCC163; [1995]Supp6SCR252

..... total non compliance of requirements of sub sections 1 and 2 of section 42 is impermissible delayed compliance with satisfactory explanation about the delay will be acceptable compliance of section 42 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //