Impermissible - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: impermissible Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 107 results (0.01 seconds)Ranchhod and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-1981
Reported in: 1981(3)SCALE1802; (1982)1SCC436; 1982(14)LC67(SC)
..... call fol the lesser sentence sen l dissenting nbsp a it is constitutionally and legally impermissible for the supreme court while hearing an appeal by special leave under art 136 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Sayed Mohd. Baquir El Edross
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-01-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1921; (1981)22GLR167; 1981(3)SCALE1793; (1981)4SCC1; [1982]1SCR551; 1981(13)LC755(SC)
..... period longer than three months whether under parliamentary law or under state law would be impermissible without obtaining the opinion of the advisory board the language of cl 4 b posits .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Jagannadha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1519; 1981LabIC1096; (1981)IILLJ252SC; 1981(3)SCALE1079; (1981)3SCC604; [1982]1SCR69; 1981(2)SLJ234(SC); 1981(13)LC601(SC)
..... gupta s case the court introduced quota rule retrospectively by the back door which is impermissible and its operation manifestly establishes its utter unfairness inasmuch as a direct recruit nor any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.G. Prabhavathi and ors. Vs. K. Nirmala and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-1981
Reported in: [1984]55CompCas670(Kar)
..... substance so as to ensure that there is no avoidance of tax by a method impermissible in law on facts held the creation of m s r m c as well .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
..... what is it that the circular letter seeks to achieve which is constitutionally objectionable or impermissible the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contended that the circular letter ..... the power and thereby remove the disability which was constitutionally provided i consider it impermissible and therefore also the contention that the court should read the words with his consent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMichael M. Vs. Superior Ct.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1981
..... be incapable of enforcement pp 450 u s 473 474 d nor is the statute impermissibly overbroad because it makes unlawful sexual intercourse with prepubescent females incapable of becoming pregnant aside ..... page 450 u s 475 we similarly reject petitioner s argument that 261 5 is impermissibly overbroad because it makes unlawful sexual intercourse with prepubescent females who are by definition incapable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKassel Vs. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-24-1981
..... snow tires the iowa supreme court declared these regulations void because their promulgation was impermissibly tied to legislative action motor club of iowa v department of transportation 251 n ..... plurality and concurrence strike down the legislation involved in this case because of asserted impermissible motives for not enacting other legislation motives which could not possibly have been present .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1981
..... consolidated edison broadly identified regulations based on the subject matter of speech as impermissible content based regulations essential first amendment concerns page 453 u s 554 were ..... to distinguish among various forms of commercial communication when the same distinctions would be impermissible if undertaken with regard to noncommercial speech indeed when adequate alternative channels of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWatkins Vs. Sowders
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1981
..... that the identification procedures fail ed to page 449 u s 344 raise any impermissible suggestiveness and that watkins was in no way prejudiced ibid watkins then unsuccessfully sought ..... trials below has proffered some evidence that pretrial police procedures directed at identification were impermissibly suggestive the flaw in the court s reasoning lies in its statement that identification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSumner Vs. Mata
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
..... reviewing the state court trial record concluded that the photographic identification was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification ..... standard used by the california state courts concluded the photographic identification was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial