Skip to content


Impermissible - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: impermissible Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 107 results (0.01 seconds)
Dec 01 1981 (SC)

Ranchhod and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-01-1981

Reported in: 1981(3)SCALE1802; (1982)1SCC436; 1982(14)LC67(SC)

..... call fol the lesser sentence sen l dissenting nbsp a it is constitutionally and legally impermissible for the supreme court while hearing an appeal by special leave under art 136 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1981 (SC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Sayed Mohd. Baquir El Edross

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-01-1981

Reported in: AIR1981SC1921; (1981)22GLR167; 1981(3)SCALE1793; (1981)4SCC1; [1982]1SCR551; 1981(13)LC755(SC)

..... period longer than three months whether under parliamentary law or under state law would be impermissible without obtaining the opinion of the advisory board the language of cl 4 b posits .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1981 (SC)

K. Jagannadha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-23-1981

Reported in: AIR1981SC1519; 1981LabIC1096; (1981)IILLJ252SC; 1981(3)SCALE1079; (1981)3SCC604; [1982]1SCR69; 1981(2)SLJ234(SC); 1981(13)LC601(SC)

..... gupta s case the court introduced quota rule retrospectively by the back door which is impermissible and its operation manifestly establishes its utter unfairness inasmuch as a direct recruit nor any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 1981 (HC)

K.G. Prabhavathi and ors. Vs. K. Nirmala and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-17-1981

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas670(Kar)

..... substance so as to ensure that there is no avoidance of tax by a method impermissible in law on facts held the creation of m s r m c as well .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 1981 (SC)

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-30-1981

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... what is it that the circular letter seeks to achieve which is constitutionally objectionable or impermissible the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contended that the circular letter ..... the power and thereby remove the disability which was constitutionally provided i consider it impermissible and therefore also the contention that the court should read the words with his consent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1981 (FN)

Michael M. Vs. Superior Ct.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-23-1981

..... be incapable of enforcement pp 450 u s 473 474 d nor is the statute impermissibly overbroad because it makes unlawful sexual intercourse with prepubescent females incapable of becoming pregnant aside ..... page 450 u s 475 we similarly reject petitioner s argument that 261 5 is impermissibly overbroad because it makes unlawful sexual intercourse with prepubescent females who are by definition incapable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1981 (FN)

Kassel Vs. Consolidated Freightways Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-24-1981

..... snow tires the iowa supreme court declared these regulations void because their promulgation was impermissibly tied to legislative action motor club of iowa v department of transportation 251 n ..... plurality and concurrence strike down the legislation involved in this case because of asserted impermissible motives for not enacting other legislation motives which could not possibly have been present .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1981 (FN)

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1981

..... consolidated edison broadly identified regulations based on the subject matter of speech as impermissible content based regulations essential first amendment concerns page 453 u s 554 were ..... to distinguish among various forms of commercial communication when the same distinctions would be impermissible if undertaken with regard to noncommercial speech indeed when adequate alternative channels of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1981 (FN)

Watkins Vs. Sowders

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-13-1981

..... that the identification procedures fail ed to page 449 u s 344 raise any impermissible suggestiveness and that watkins was in no way prejudiced ibid watkins then unsuccessfully sought ..... trials below has proffered some evidence that pretrial police procedures directed at identification were impermissibly suggestive the flaw in the court s reasoning lies in its statement that identification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1981 (FN)

Sumner Vs. Mata

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-21-1981

..... reviewing the state court trial record concluded that the photographic identification was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification ..... standard used by the california state courts concluded the photographic identification was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //