Impaction - Judgment Search Results

Metal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior Sale ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(2)KCCR853; 2012(3)CTC(IP)15

defendant and not vice versa. The defendant is the prior adopter of the name and style of M/s Impact Metals. In fact the plaintiff company was formed with the name any style of Klass Engineering. The defendant

M/S. Metal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior ...

Court: Karnataka

defendant and not vice versa. The defendant is the prior adopter of the name and style of M/s Impact Metals. In fact the plaintiff company was formed with the name any style of Klass Engineering. The defendant

Desiderata Impact Venture Pvt Ltd vs Burge Enterprises

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1952/2025 DESIDERATA IMPACT VENTURE PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Chauhan, Advocate (through VC)versusBURGE ENTERPRISES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neelabh Bist, Mr.

impact College of Education and Applied Sciences Vs. National Council ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004(6)KarLJ632

ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. Since common question of law and fact arise for consideration in all these petitions, by consent of the learned Counsels for the parties, they are taken up together and disposed of by...

impact Polytechnic and ors. Vs. All India Council for Technical Educat ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2006KAR548; 2006(1)KarLJ396

ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. In W.P. No. 16315 of 2005-1st petitioner is an educational institution by name 'Impact Polytechnic' (for short 'Institution'), imparting education in Diploma Courses. Petitioners 2 to 11 are the students admitted by...

impact Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex., Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(85)ELT213(Bom)

would be dealt with accordingly and appropriate action under the Act would be taken. 3. The petitioners - Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd. is a Private Limited Company engaged in the manufacture of variety of aluminium products. The

impact Advertising Pvt. Ltd. (M/S.) Vs. M/S. Thomson Press (India) Ltd ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)314; AIR2000Delhi173; 84(2000)DLT274; 2000(53)DRJ82

ORDERVijender Jain, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional District Judge, this appeal has been filed by the defendant/appellant. It has been contended by Mr. Bhasin, learned counsel for the appellant that the...

impact Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M. R. Nadkarni, Supdt. of Central Exci ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(18)ECC58; 1987(31)ELT879(Bom)

1. The petitioners manufacture collapsible aluminium tubes. They are also carrying on the process of capping of collapsible aluminium tubes within the company's licensed factory premises.2. In writ petition No. 1249 of 1980 this Court, after...

Ecie Impact Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. (Appeals)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)8STR325

M/s. ECIE, Hyderabad procured duty paid inputs from their sister unit M/s. ECIE Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore and M/s. Impact Safety Glass Works (P) Limited, Bangalore and had discharged duty liability of Rs. 18,89,912/- and the entire contract.

impact Safety Glass Works Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1998)LC133Tri(Chennai)

the deliberate design of the Rule-making authority can be frustrated nor words and expressions disregarded as otiose. The impact of the expression "used in relation to the manufacture" must be allowed its natural play. [AIR 1965 (S.C.)