Imaginary - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: imaginary Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 106 results (0.012 seconds)Amit Rakesh Janbandhu Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-20-2002
Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)561; 2003CriLJ600; 2002(3)MhLj90
v m kanade j 1 by this petition the petitioner is challenging the detention order dated 27 7 2001 issued...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Prabhawati Tokersi Chheda Vs. Maharashtra Housing and Area Develo ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-27-2002
Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR579
h l gokhale j 1 this writ petition invoking article 226 ofthe constitution of india is filed by a tenant...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Orissa and ors. Vs. Balaram Sahu and ors., Etc. Etc.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-29-2002
Reported in : AIR2003SC33; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)378; 2003(1)AWC273(SC); 95(2003)CLT287(SC); [2002(95)FLR954]; JT2002(8)SC477; (2002)IIILLJ1115SC; (2003)1SCC250; 2002(2)LC1535(SC)
d raju j civil appeal no 7342 of 1993 1 the respondents in this appeal who are n m r...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGtc Limited Vs. Royal Consulting Rv, Being a Company Registered Under ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-30-2002
Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR608
f t rebello j 1 the questions for determination in thisappeal form order arise from two agreements thefirst agreement was...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd., Vs. Union of India (Uoi),
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-20-2002
Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR445; 2003(90)ECC293; 2003LC143(Bombay); 2003(156)ELT467(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj645; [2004]135STC168(Bom)
h l gokhale j 1 this writ petition under article 226 of theconstitution of india seeks to challenge the order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai Vs. Shri M. Karunanidhi, Found ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jun-07-2002
Reported in : (2002)2MLJ821
..... with mr m karunanidhi ii cartoons containing the comments and iii imaginary conversation with two individuals 5 in so far as the ..... pleading i e verse dated16 12 2001 in the shape of imaginary conversation between twofriends one being a guileless person and another ..... mr m karunanidhi counters this argument and submits that the conversationis imaginary and is a part of literary activity and nothing can .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of M.P. Vs. Mathura Singh and anr.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-03-2002
Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT148
..... to produce a certificate of middle examination he was compelled to write an imaginary date of birth 1 6 1930 and was asked to sign the ..... that at the time of entry into service the date of birth whether imaginary or otherwise was recorded as 1 6 1930 and the so calted ..... that in the present case the respondent had taken benefit of the said imaginary date of birth i e 1 6 1930 by getting recruited as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Union of India (U ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-17-2002
Reported in : (2003)3SCC186; [2002]SUPP5SCR222
..... fixed service providers j the fear expressed by the cellular operators is either feigned or imaginary k the cellular operators can also use latest technology including wll with limited mobility and ..... about unexpected new competition xv the fear expressed by the petitioners is either feigned or imaginary xvi advance of technology must be allowed to go ahead without any check or hindrance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Orissa Vs. Ramwatar Agarwala and After Him, His L. Rs. Smt. B ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jun-19-2002
Reported in : 94(2002)CLT158
..... false he has not sustained any loss as claimed and if he has sustained any imaginary loss for his detention under misa defendant no 1 is not responsible as defendant no ..... not a fact that there are such papers with me and i am making an imaginary claim regarding the quantum of stock 25 thus though the books of accounts were available .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGangadhar Behera and ors. Vs. State of Orissa
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-10-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC3633; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)794; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)137; 2003CriLJ41; 2003(1)Crimes28(SC); JT2002(8)SC135; 2002(7)SCALE402; (2002)8SCC381; [2002]SUPP3SCR183
..... of u p v ashok kumar srivastava 1992 1scr37 a reasonable doubt is not an imaginary trivial or merely possible doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense ..... lack of it as opposed to mere vague apprehensions a reasonable doubt is not an imaginary trivial or a merely possible doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and commonsense .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT