Imaginary - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: imaginary Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 83 results (0.009 seconds)A.B.C. Enterprises Vs. Bodh Raj Charan Singh and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: May-22-1995
Reported in: AIR1996J& K57
khan j 1 it is about a contract allotted to the appellant by the india oil corporation ioc to carry...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeorge Kokkattumundayil Vs. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-24-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Ker26
order1 these are three petitions practically dealing with identical contentions although the first petition o p 1019 1995 is by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Harmilapi Vs. Sports Authority of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-1995
Reported in: 1995IAD(Delhi)678; 57(1995)DLT441
c m nayar j 1 the present judgment disposes of two writ petitions bearing nos cw 3302 of 1992 and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukesh Ram Chandani and Others Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-13-1995
Reported in: AIR1996All219; (1995)3UPLBEC2006
orderu p singh j 1 at the very threshold the common question raised in all these petitions is as to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Voltas Ltd. Bombay Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-07-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1881; [1995]83CompCas228(SC); JT1995(2)SC261; 1995(1)SCALE455; 1995Supp(2)SCC498; [1995]1SCR947
..... 1952 a c 109 lord asquith has said if you are bidder to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real you must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine ..... to restrictive trade practices by the deeming clause one is not required to treat any imaginary state of affairs as real but to treat the agreements specified and enumerated in sub .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarish Tandon Vs. Addl. District Magistrate, Allahabad, U.P. and Other ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-05-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC676; JT1995(1)SC290; 1995(1)SCALE65; (1995)1SCC537; [1995]1SCR56
..... the town and county planning act 1947 observed if you are bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real you must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine ..... finsbury borough council supra it was said that when one is bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real he must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReynoldsville Casket Co. Vs. Hyde
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-15-1995
..... 4 year statute to the second out of state defendants ohio might have cured this imaginary constitutional problem either 1 by applying a 4 year statute to both groups or 2 ..... could continue because the 4 year statute would no longer violate the federal constitution this imaginary case however is not the case at hand for the ohio supreme court s remedy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSagar Bose Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: May-24-1995
Reported in: (1996)56ITD561(Kol.)
..... 02 and therefore the margin of profit in such type of business is not only imaginary and unreal but also fictitious the cit a considered all the explanations arguments and contentions ..... 10 95 181 the resultant gross profit rate comes to 82 which is not only imaginary and unreal but is also fictitious in this line of business we find a substantial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Enterprise Ltd. Vs. Kamlesh Aggarwal and Another
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: May-03-1995
..... claim put forward is genuine arising out of concrete facts or is merely fanciful or imaginary in the present case we find that the commercial flat was taken by respondent no ..... connection it would therefore follow that the claim made by respondent no 1 was not imaginary or fanciful 9 with regard to water and sewerage admittedly these facilities have not been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.L. Singhal Vs. Pradeep Mathur and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Delhi261; ILR1996Delhi106
..... could have lived longer it cannot be said that this presumption of the plaintiff was imaginary defendant no 1st letter exhibit d 1 1 does indicate that defendant no 1 after ..... the presumption of the plaintiff based on defendant no 1 s opinion cannot be called imaginary to ex press a grievance strongly against a professional does not amount to defamation by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial