Skip to content


Imaginary - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: imaginary Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 83 results (0.009 seconds)
May 22 1995 (HC)

A.B.C. Enterprises Vs. Bodh Raj Charan Singh and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: May-22-1995

Reported in: AIR1996J& K57

khan j 1 it is about a contract allotted to the appellant by the india oil corporation ioc to carry...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1995 (HC)

George Kokkattumundayil Vs. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-24-1995

Reported in: AIR1996Ker26

order1 these are three petitions practically dealing with identical contentions although the first petition o p 1019 1995 is by...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 1995 (HC)

Suresh Harmilapi Vs. Sports Authority of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-10-1995

Reported in: 1995IAD(Delhi)678; 57(1995)DLT441

c m nayar j 1 the present judgment disposes of two writ petitions bearing nos cw 3302 of 1992 and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1995 (HC)

Mukesh Ram Chandani and Others Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-13-1995

Reported in: AIR1996All219; (1995)3UPLBEC2006

orderu p singh j 1 at the very threshold the common question raised in all these petitions is as to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 1995 (SC)

M/S. Voltas Ltd. Bombay Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-07-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC1881; [1995]83CompCas228(SC); JT1995(2)SC261; 1995(1)SCALE455; 1995Supp(2)SCC498; [1995]1SCR947

..... 1952 a c 109 lord asquith has said if you are bidder to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real you must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine ..... to restrictive trade practices by the deeming clause one is not required to treat any imaginary state of affairs as real but to treat the agreements specified and enumerated in sub .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1995 (SC)

Harish Tandon Vs. Addl. District Magistrate, Allahabad, U.P. and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-05-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC676; JT1995(1)SC290; 1995(1)SCALE65; (1995)1SCC537; [1995]1SCR56

..... the town and county planning act 1947 observed if you are bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real you must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine ..... finsbury borough council supra it was said that when one is bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real he must surely unless prohibited from doing so also imagine .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1995 (FN)

Reynoldsville Casket Co. Vs. Hyde

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-15-1995

..... 4 year statute to the second out of state defendants ohio might have cured this imaginary constitutional problem either 1 by applying a 4 year statute to both groups or 2 ..... could continue because the 4 year statute would no longer violate the federal constitution this imaginary case however is not the case at hand for the ohio supreme court s remedy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1995 (TRI)

Sagar Bose Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: May-24-1995

Reported in: (1996)56ITD561(Kol.)

..... 02 and therefore the margin of profit in such type of business is not only imaginary and unreal but also fictitious the cit a considered all the explanations arguments and contentions ..... 10 95 181 the resultant gross profit rate comes to 82 which is not only imaginary and unreal but is also fictitious in this line of business we find a substantial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1995 (TRI)

Ajay Enterprise Ltd. Vs. Kamlesh Aggarwal and Another

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: May-03-1995

..... claim put forward is genuine arising out of concrete facts or is merely fanciful or imaginary in the present case we find that the commercial flat was taken by respondent no ..... connection it would therefore follow that the claim made by respondent no 1 was not imaginary or fanciful 9 with regard to water and sewerage admittedly these facilities have not been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 1995 (HC)

M.L. Singhal Vs. Pradeep Mathur and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-1995

Reported in: AIR1996Delhi261; ILR1996Delhi106

..... could have lived longer it cannot be said that this presumption of the plaintiff was imaginary defendant no 1st letter exhibit d 1 1 does indicate that defendant no 1 after ..... the presumption of the plaintiff based on defendant no 1 s opinion cannot be called imaginary to ex press a grievance strongly against a professional does not amount to defamation by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //