Hold - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: hold Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 618 results (0.134 seconds)J.K. Holdings Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-26-2000
..... maintaining a regular establishment in the name and style of j k holdings and the expenses claimed by the assessee were also not usual in ..... this activity under the name and style of m s j k holdings and the nature of activity would clearly indicate that there was intention ..... hand the case of the assessee is that m s j k holdings was created to centralise all the minors investments and the trust had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Holdings Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-26-2000
Reported in: (2001)70TTJ(Mumbai)649
..... a regular establishment in the name and style of j k holdings and the expenses claimed by the assessee were also not usual ..... assessee is liable to be taxed as per the normal rates holdings and the nature of activity would clearly indicate that there was ..... profit and thus strongly supported the orders of the tax authorities holdings was created to centralise all the minors investments and the trust .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBina Puri Holdings Bhd, Vijayawada and Another Vs. Government of A.P. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD1; 2000(2)ALT190
..... name and address of foreign collaborator as m s bina puri holdings bhd who is petitioner no 1 the agreement entered into between ..... the cost of local companies therefore this argument also does not hold good 11 the learned additional advocate general appearing for the official ..... be given an even ground therefore this argument also does not hold good assessed available bid capacity a n 2 b a maximum .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVastu Invest and Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-09-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)ALLMR322; 2001(2)ARBLR315(Bom); (2001)2BOMLR156
..... arbitral award challenged before the learned single judge was theaward holding that an amount of rs 25 lakhs with interest thereon ..... document was wholly impermissible the learned single judge rightly proceeded to hold that the document was one of business service centre and ..... award challenged before the learned single judge was the award holding that an amount of rs 25 lakhs with interest thereon .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Excise Vs. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Oct-27-2000
Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC813
1 this appeal preferred by the department against the order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals 2 appearing on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShriram Industrial Holdings (P) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Oct-05-2000
Reported in: (2003)84ITD62(Mad.)
..... for the sake of convenience these appeals have been filed by m s shriram industrial holdings p ltd venus colony madras 18 against the common order passed by the cit a ..... for non payment in time of tax deducted under section 192 of the act we hold that section 201 1a of the act is mandatory and the tribunal was right in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Felix Pinto and ors. Vs. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and ors. an ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-25-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)BomCR171; (2001)1BOMLR129; [2001]104CompCas707(Bom); (2000)4CompLJ302(Bom); 2001(1)MhLj512
..... it is the case of the plaintiffs that plaintiff no 1 was holding 2900 shares and plaintiff no 2 was holding 1800 shares under folio no 148934 out of these shares 1500 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen of Pepsico India Holdings Limited Vs. Deputy Labour Commission ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-24-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC1800; [2000(85)FLR778]; (2000)IILLJ523All; (2000)2UPLBEC1602
..... k p agarwal learned counsel for petitioner 2 the petitioners are workmen of pepsico india holdings limited which is a purely private company and is not state under article 12 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAllahabad Bank Vs. Arc Holding Limited and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC3098; [2000]102CompCas443(SC); 2000(6)SCALE496
short essential facts 3 the appellant allahabad bank the decree holder is a secured creditor of rishra steel limited respondent no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJyotsna Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority Under the Kar Viva ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2000
Reported in: 2000IVAD(Delhi)461; 2000(53)DRJ696; [2000]243ITR246(Delhi)
orderd k jain j 1 two short but interesting questions namely i whether interest under section 220 2 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial