Hindu - Judgment Search Results
Hindu Nadar Educational Trust and Others Vs. Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-22-2016
representation dated 29.06.2015 as members of the school committee of Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Periayaki Rengasamy Girls Higher Secondary School, Nilakottai.'' 3.
Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2005
Reported in: (2005)3MLJ149
and G.K. Jayajothimurughan in their representative capacity on behalf of Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam. The suit was
Smt. Shamavathi, Hindu W/O Vishwanath Rai, Vs. Smt. Appi S. Pergade W/ ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2009
has brought to my notice Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes 90 days as the period of limitation
Narsingh Das Vs. Firm Joint Hindu Family Known as Gogan Ram Lachmi Nar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-1954
Reported in: AIR1955P& H31
Letters Patent Appeals are as follows.The present appellant, a joint Hindu family firm named Gogan Ram Lachmi Narain, instituted a suit
Workers in the hindu (Madras Union of Journalists) Vs. the hindu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-1958
Reported in: (1958)IILLJ344Mad
an appreciable number of the working journalists of the ' Hindu ' and that therefore this is not an industrial dispute
Management of the hindu, Madras Vs. Secretary Hindu Office and Nationa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-1959
Reported in: AIR1961Mad107; [1961(2)FLR344]; (1960)ILLJ187Mad
of unbroken service, whichever isearlier.'When the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, came into force, the management submitted the rules they
Lalita Krishnaraj Parekh and Rakesh Krishnaraj Parekh Both of Bombay, ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-15-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)MhLj701
referring to Sections 69, 70 and 90 of the Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925.
Sri Shivamurthy, Son of Late Siddaveerappa, Hindu, Aged About 60 Years ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.Petitioners/plaintiffs have filed this writ petition against respondent/defendant to quash the order dated 24.02.2010 as at Annexure-B.2.Heard Sri A.V.Srinivas, learned...
Julie Jayesh Shah, Hindu Vs. Jayesh Trilok Kumar Shah, Hindu
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
Respondent in the Family Court. Efforts were made by the marriage councilor to find out the ways and and means to
Working Journalists of the hindu Madras Vs. Management of the hindu, M ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Mad370; (1961)ILLJ288Mad; (1961)1MLJ260
a considerable section of those employees. The employees of the Hindu as a whole or of the editorial department to which
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »