Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 Section 6 - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Tata Tea Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC2046A; 2002(81)ECC225; 2002(2)KLT270(SC); [2002]128STC331(SC)

..... in law and of her mother in law in joint family properties hindu succession act 1956 section 6 as it stood prior to the amendment act of 2005 sections 8 15 r v raveendran j m panchal jj joint ..... hindu family devolution of property in intestate succession in a specified case of partition joint .....

N. Adithayan Vs. the Travancore Devaswom Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC3538; 2003(1)ALD28(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)843; 95(2003)CLT504(SC); JT2002(8)SC51; 2002(3)KLT615(SC); (2002)8SCC106; [2002]SUPP3SCR76

mixed up this is more particularly so in regard to hindu religion because as is well known under the provisions of the fact of rights claimed on the basis of hereditary succession the attempted exercise by the learned senior counsel for the in the same decision the grievance that the innocent looking amendment brought the state right into the sanctum sanctorum through the including article 17 freedom to entertain and exhibit by outward acts as well as propagate and disseminate such religious belief according religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of hindus and any such rights of the state or and came to be dispensed with by an order dated 6 8 1993 in his place the third respondent who figured

Ram Kumar Vs. Shanker Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj99; 2002(3)WLC483; 2002(2)WLN607

no case particularly in view of section 8 of the hindu succession act 1956 by virtue of which the plaintiff is indian succession act 1925 20 section 213 of the indian succession act 1925 is quoted here which reads as under section any parsi dying after the commencement of the indian succession amendment act 1962 where such wills are made within the local quoted herein below object and scope the object of the act is to consolidate all indian laws relating to succession the above submissions of both the parties it is clear that section 213 of the indian succession act 1925 bars establishing a it submitted that smt chanda bai before her death on 6 1 1993 executed a will dated 2 11 1973 and

Smt. Chandrakanta and anr. Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT51; 2002(1)MPLJ497

8 to inherit the latter would by applying the old hindu law get a right by birth of the said property position has been affected by section 8 of the hindu succession act 1956 and therefore after the act when the son 1956 the preamble states that it was an act to amend and codify the law relating to intestate succession among hindus both these judgments in my opinion the courts below have acted with material irregularity in exercise of their jurisdiction and in this court observed that this position has been affected by section 8 of the hindu succession act 1956 and therefore after nos 3 and 4 regarding agricultural land bearing survey nos 66 and 94 situated at village badokhar district morena the said

Sashi Kanta Sarma Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Guwahati

the temple will be nominated by the judge from the hindu public of guwhati city 6 the word tour appearing in learned district judge on 15 3 1995 ordered the proposed amendment in the following terms a sub para 1 of para chief justice or his designate under section 11 of the act nominating an arbitrator is not an adjudicatory order and the that the order of chief justice or his designate under section 11 of the act nominating an arbitrator is not an scheme under which the temple has been managed is also 60 years old and by this time numerous social changes have

Mrs. Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj270; 2002(2)WLC735

educational institution run by a society registered under societies registration act which receives grant in aid from the govt and which overage so fixing a cut of date as in the amendment on 25 1 1990 is not only discriminatory arbitrary but educational institution run by a society registered under societies registration act which receives grant in aid from the govt and which rules of 1971 rajasthan educational service rules 1970 sub rule 6 hasgiven relaxation to the government employee notwithstanding anything contained contrary

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Reported in : (2003)260ITR1(Nag.)

cpra the learned cit a also observed that the said act nowhere mentions any thing about the appropriation of the amount assessee s case for asst yr 1991 92 and the successor learned cit a was not justified in following the decision of bad debts has undergone a substantial change after the amendment made in the provisions of section 36 1 vii w the government we find no justification in the ao s action in disallowing the deduction on account of the said interest section 37 3 and 37 4 override the provisions of section 37 1 and opined that such overriding has to be liability 16 11 so far as the provision of rs 62 49 lacs made in respect of employees covered by executive

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Reported in : (2002)77TTJ(Nag.)401

command the allowability of the same under the income tax act he also clarified that the hemm rehabilitation expenses were incurred in assessees case for assessment year 1991 92 and the successor learned commissioner appeals was not justified in following the decision to the assessing officer to proceed under section after the amendments made to section 147 with effect from 1 4 1989 income tax purposes is one which is towards a liability actually existing at the time but the putting aside of money as the same is covered by the specific provision of section 32 in the case of mahindra and mahindra ltd v the case of cit v mahalaxmi textile mills ltd 1967 66 itr 710 sc the honble supreme court has held that

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

ii of schedule vii of the constitution etc the amendment act 27 of 1998 was struck down by the madras high of writ petitions when the court pointed out that by amendment act 23 1995 the legislature has only enhanced the rate is distinguishable on facts viz i under the tamil nadu act the levy of life tax was based on the value section 8 of the act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established month of registration is 1 notmore than 2 years965 1740 638 5405 9265 10290 2334 2 morethan 2 yrs but not

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and ors. Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP196; 2002(2)MPHT353

known at the commencement of this constitution as the benares hindu university the aligarh muslim university and the delhi university the the university and its commencement it has been faithfully and successfully performing its functions of imparting full and complete knowledge in has been brought into the statute book by way of amendment the learned senior counsel for the petitioners have attacked the be required to be followed by the university under this act or any other law for the time being in force the amended act came into existence in the amended act sections 2 4 9 and 17 have been amended and new of management maharishi1301 5 maharishi s master management maharishi 1301 6 maharishi s vedic approach to health maharishi 1301 7 maharishi