Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 Section 6 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: hindu succession amendment act 2005 section 6 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 571 results (1.159 seconds)Narayanan Vs. Meenakshi
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-23-2005
Reported in : AIR2006Ker143; 2006(1)KLT210
..... 1956 act as per section 4 of the hindu succession amendment act 2005 act 39 of 2005 section 23 of the hindu succession act 1956 is omitted the question is whether the omission of section 23 of the hindu succession act in ..... legal representatives legal heirs of the said male member 6 whether the right conferred under section 23 of the hindu succession act 1956 on a male member enures to the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPeri Bhaskararao and ors. Vs. Sathi Adilakshmi
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-20-2005
Reported in : AIR2006AP212
this context the scope and ambit of section 8 of hindu minority and guardianship act 1956 the counsel after making elaborate might have been placed after the commencement of the hindu succession act in fact it in express terms prohibits the operation added in the agreement subsequently by virtue of hindu succession amendment act of 1986 she also became entitled to a share level i e secondary level section 2 21 of the act defines the term recognised the last clause therein is by section 8 of the act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established notification made by the government in the gazette ex a 6 is g o ms no 180 municipal administration dated 8
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElectrical Engineering Agencies and anr. Vs. New India Assurance Compa ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-17-2005
Reported in : III(2006)ACC391; 2006ACJ1957
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Bijapur Branch Through Its Regional Of ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-02-2005
Reported in : 2007ACJ1241
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Syed Mahaboob Since Deceased by L. ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-29-2005
Reported in : IV(2006)ACC394
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. B.P. Poovavva and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-21-2005
Reported in : III(2006)ACC735
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention ..... the respondent no 6 within one month sections 8 23 as amended by act 39 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj succession opened earlier to the amended act 39 2005 applicability of amended provisions to such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. HussaIn Sab and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-13-2005
Reported in : IV(2006)ACC557
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhakrishna Bhakta Vs. Subramanya Shastri and anr.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-11-2005
Reported in : [2006(110)FLR695]
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Susheela W/O Late Narayana Kalluraya Vs. the 1st Land Tribunal by I ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-15-2005
Reported in : 2006(6)KarLJ254
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Ruth and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-26-2005
Reported in : 2007ACJ1226
..... valid and their son was a legitimately born son hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 section 6 as amended with effect from 9 9 2005 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj contention raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT