Court : Chennai
Reported in : 2007(2)CTC369
..... of cooling water required depends on the technology employed, and they propose to use sea water of 36,000 mm3/day. fresh water cooling will also be considered. alternatively closed cycle refrigeration might also be used which may not consume water daily but would consume power. demineralisation of water by means of ion exchange will be done before using for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD772
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Seeking to have the proceedings, in Rc. No. 5429/97. Admn. dated 10.9.1998, issued by the 1st respondent and the consequential notice, in Rc. No. B/176/97 dated 9.1.1999, issued by the 4th respondent quashed, the present writ petition is filed.2. In his proceedings dated 10.9.1998, the Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of the Respondent-Corporation, dismissed the petitioner from service treating the period of his suspension as 'dies non' and further directed that he shall make good the loss caused to the respondent-corporation of Rs. 54,034-10 with interest. Thereafter, the Senior Manager, Yellandu, (4th respondent), issued notice dated 9.1.1999 directing the petitioner to remit Rs. 54,034-10 with 18% interest per annum within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice. The petitioner was informed that, in case he failed to do so, necessary legal action for recovery would be initiated against him.3. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioner, a Junior ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(1)ALD520; 2007(1)ALT345
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Episode in short: M/s. Dr. Ambedkar Seva Sangham, Ambedkar Bhavan, Akberpet, Bapatla, Guntur District, represented by its General Secretary M. Jaya Rao and certain others filed the present Writ Petition praying for issuance of a writ of quo warranto against the 9th respondent on the ground that the 9th respondent had usurped the office of the Chairperson of Bapatla Municipality and also the office of Municipal Councillor of 8th Ward of the said Municipality on the ground that the said 9th respondent belongs to Scheduled Caste though in fact he does not belong to Schedule Caste at all, but belongs to B.C. 'C (Mala) converted to Christianity.2. Several factual details are narrated in the respective pleadings of the parties. This Court issued Notice Before Admission initially on 28-8-2006 and issued rule nisi on 7-9-2006. Inasmuch as the contesting respondents had put in their respective pleadings, the counter affidavits, the Writ Petition is being finally dispose...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(3)ALD805; 2007(2)ALT566
..... land in plot no. iii was sold by the purchaser ram bhupaul in favour of sri g.s.arora, mrs. neera arora, sri t.s.arora and sri s.k.sen gupta under a registered sale deed dated 24-09-1975. the said purchasers from ram bhupaul in turn divided the said extent amongst themselves under an oral partition which was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD635
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The City Restaurant Stores and Bakery represented by its Partner-the writ petitioner filed the present writ petition praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for records and quash the Letter No. 16/8/17/5/21 /TPS/C2/2005/75, dated 21-8-2006 issued by the 1st respondent and connected record relating to award proceedings in A/936/2005 dated 25-1-2006, issued by the 2nd respondent, as the same being illegal, arbitrary against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to allot alternative site to the petitioner by extending the benefits of the judgment made in W.P. No. 16705 of 1986 and to pass such other suitable orders.2. The 1st respondent is the Assistant City Planner, Circle-II, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent is the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and the 3rd respondent-Sunil Kumar Gupta, who is the owner of the property in question, though duly serve...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD28; 2007(3)ALT265
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The background facts in all these writ petitions and the civil revision petition are same. The rival claim of the parties - be it petitioners or respondents; is in respect of the same land admeasuring about Acs. 55.00 in Survey Nos. 210 to 213, 221 to 225 (for the sake of convenience referred to hereinafter as schedule land) situated at Papayyaguda Hamlet of Kuntloor Village of Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The contentions raised and the documents relied on are almost the same. It is therefore expedient to pass common order.Background Facts (For the sake of convenience, the Writ Petition No. 3012 of 2002 is treated as comprehensive one and parties are also referred as per their status therein).2. The schedule land and other extents of land (total extent of 300 acres in same survey numbers) originally belonged to one Vakiti Pulla Reddy, husband of eighth respondent. After enactment of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (herea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD56; 2007(4)ALT283
V. Eswaraiah, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and decree dated 26-11-1997 passed in O.S. No. 1 103 of 1985 by the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The appellant in CCCA No. 29 of 1998 is the plaintiff and the appellant in CCCA No. 19 of 1998 is the defendant in the suit O.S. No. 1 103 of 1985. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.3. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of oral agreement of sale directing the defendant to execute a sale deed for 2050 sq. yards out of 8200 sq. yards forming part of S. No. 219 situated at Saidabad Village within the limits of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation after obtaining necessary permission from the authorities under the Urban Land Ceiling Act or alternatively to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 169,930/- towards refund of the sale price and damages, together with future interest on the said sum @ 18% from the date of plaint till the date of realization. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(3)ALD663; 2007(4)ALT143
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Second Appeal No. 1385 of 2003 and C.R.P.No. 6317 of 2005 are interrelated with each other. Hence, they are disposed of through common judgment. Except for some minor variations, the parties are common to the proceedings. For the sake of convenience, they are referred to, as arrayed in the second appeal.2. The relevant facts may, briefly, be stated as under:3. Posina Tammayya had three sons, namely, Venkata Rayudu, Satyanarayana and Suryanarayana. The third son is possessed of lands, in various survey numbers. Substantial extent thereof is said to have been leased, in favour of respondents 1 to 7. As regards 90 cents of land in R.S. No. 242/2 of Apparaopet Village, the 1st appellant herein, who is one of the grandsons of Venkata Rayudu, brother of Suryanarayana, filed O.S. No. 36 of 1985 in the Court of Principal District Munsif, Tadepalligudem, against the respondents herein, for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession. The suit was prese...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(3)ALD469; 2008(3)ALT159
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Defendants in a suit for partition are the appellants. For the sake of convenience the parties to this appeal would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.2. Minor plaintiff, represented by his mother as guardian, filed the suit for partition of the properties specified in the plaint A to D schedules (the suit properties) into two equal shares, and for allotment of one such share to him inter alia contending that his father Narsing Rao (the deceased), the son of the defendants 1 and 2, died on 12-12-1954 leaving behind his wife Sushila Bai, who took him in adoption as per sastric rites on 02-03-1975 in the presence of the villagers. A deed of adoption evidencing his adoption was also executed by her on 13-02-1980. As the coparcenary of the deceased and first defendant, of which the first defendant was the karta, was possessing the suit properties, the deceased was having half share therein. After the death of the deceased he became entit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(5)ALD339
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Defendants 14 to 18 and 20 to 26 in a suit for partition filed by respondents 1 to 7 as indigent persons are the appellants. For the sake of convenience, parties to the appeal would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.2. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is that plaintiffs 1 to 5 are the great grandsons of Rachuri Swamy who had a son by name Subbarayudu whose son is Gangaraju i.e. the 1st defendant and was married to the 2nd defendant. They begot plaintiffs 1 to 5 and three daughters from out of their wedlock. Properties specified in the plaint 'A' schedule which belonged to Rachuri Swamy devolved on his son Subbarayudu and thereafter on the first defendant. As first defendant was addicted to vices and was contracting debts for that purpose, he nominally executed a gift deed in respect of the plaint 'A' schedule properties in the name of his wife, the 2nd defendant and so the said gift deed is void. 2nd defendant, in pursuance of ...
Tag this Judgment!