Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR370; [2005(106)FLR154]; 2005(2)MhLj980a
..... india in 1974 under the industries development regulation act. subsequently, on 15th october, 1980 the government of india took over the undertaking under the hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited nationalization act, 1980. the services of the workmen were continued in the employment of the corporation upon nationalization. government of india is ..... the period between 1st january, 1999 and 31st december, 1999.3. the petitioner before the court is the national bicycle corporation of india limited. hind cycles limited which was run by the birla group of industries had a factory at worli, mumbai, in which the manufacture of bicycles and bicycle parts was ..... stated to have taken a decision to close-down the company with effect from 21st january, 2001.4. the first respondent joined the employment of hind cycles limited .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR470; (2002)4BOMLR473; [2002(95)FLR751]; (2002)IIILLJ787Bom; 2002(2)MhLj850
..... of section 25f of theindustrial disputes act, 1947. during the pendency ofthe references, the hind cycles limited and sen-raleighlimited (nationalisation) act, 1980 (hereinafterreferred to as 'nationalisation act') was enacted. twocompanies, hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limitedwere nationalised and their assets vested in theappellant from the appointed day i.e. ..... analogous to res judicata being applicableto the award of the industrial tribunal is devoid ofany substance. the first reference made in 1975 wasbetween hind cycles limited and the individualworkman. the labour courts while making the awardswere circumscribed by the dispute referred to them andhave held in those references ..... in reference (it) no. 40 of 1984granting continued employment to the workmen with theappellant from the date of termination of theirservices with hind cycles limited. the learnedcounsel also faintly submitted that the appellant wasnot in a position to defend themselves in thereference as records of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR472; (1995)ILLJ525Bom; 1995(1)MhLj140
..... to the benefit of continued employment and back wages etc., from the date of their purported termination onwards in view of the provisions contained in section 13(1) of hind cycles ltd. and sen-raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980. by the said award, the industrial tribunal has directed the petitioner to pay all such benefits to the concerned employees who are alive and ..... /retrenchment shall have to be treated as void ab initio and non-est for all purposes. 5. on 27th december, 1980 the hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980 was passed. prior thereto the management of the undertaking of hind cycles limited was taken over by the central government, under the provisions of industries (development and regulation) act, 1951. under section 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... clinic, innocently goes along with him on the scooty. accused no.1 joins them. they go to the house of accused no.1, change the vehicle and, on a motor cycle, they travel on the highway and thereafter, take the child in the interiors. the unsuspecting child is done away to death by smothering. they remove his t-shirt so that ..... . the man told suresh that he had been asked by his mother to bring him to the hospital. based on the said assertion, suresh accompanied the man on his motor cycle. accordingly, the mother lodged complaint with police station. in the night of the same day, the mother received a call on her mobile phone from one shankar demanding ransom of ..... the accused no.1 rajesh along with one another person and one minor boy had come on a scooty. they parked the scooty in courtyard and thereafter took his motor cycle and went away. 28. the evidence of pw.9 divya chandel is at exh. 47. the witness is taking education in adarsha vidyalaya of village patansawangi. she states that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1 Both appeals arise out of the common judgment and order, therefore, they were heard together and can be disposed of by common judgment. 2 These appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent are directed against the judgment and order dated 27.06.2012 of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.3440/2011. That Writ Petition was filed by the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 in LPA No.278/2012, who are original Petitioners and they impugned the order passed by the Respondent No.1 State Government dated 30.10.2010 in Revision Application by which the Revisional Authority has set aside the orders dated 20.02.2010 and 22.06.2010 of the Collector, Nagpur and the Commissioner, State Excise respectively. The Revision Application before the Minister was filed by the Appellant before us in LPA No.278/2012 as its application seeking FLIII licence was rejected. 3 The facts leading to the filing of these Appeals are that the Appellant in LPA No.278/2012 made an application for gran...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1 Both appeals arise out of the common judgment and order, therefore, they were heard together and can be disposed of by common judgment. 2 These appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent are directed against the judgment and order dated 27.06.2012 of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.3440/2011. That Writ Petition was filed by the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 in LPA No.278/2012, who are original Petitioners and they impugned the order passed by the Respondent No.1 State Government dated 30.10.2010 in Revision Application by which the Revisional Authority has set aside the orders dated 20.02.2010 and 22.06.2010 of the Collector, Nagpur and the Commissioner, State Excise respectively. The Revision Application before the Minister was filed by the Appellant before us in LPA No.278/2012 as its application seeking FLIII licence was rejected. 3 The facts leading to the filing of these Appeals are that the Appellant in LPA No.278/2012 made an application for gran...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR1
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J1. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both the petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The Goa Public Health Act, 1985, hereinafter called as 'the Health Act' has been amended by the Public Health (Amendment) Act, 2005, hereinafter called as 'the Amendment Act'. The petitioners challenge the Amendment Act, on the ground that the same encroaches upon the legislation by the Parliament i.e. the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003, hereinafter called as 'the Tobacco Act', and Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, hereinafter called as 'Food Adulteration Act' which relate to Entry Nos.33 and 18 respectively of Concurrent List and considering the Entry No. 52 of Union List read with declaration under Section 2 of the Tobacco Act, the entire tobacco industry comes under the control of Uni...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in : (2006)(105)ECC409
1. Heard both sides in these appeals. The appellants are an assessee under the Central Excise Act and their Directors. These appeals arising from a common order are being disposed of by this common order.2.1 The assessee cleared a product declared as Kasol and Solvent KG allegedly incorrectly claimed of exemption under Notification 179/77 by claiming the goods to be classified under T.I. 68 (of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff). They cleared the goods in the guise of chem.Liquid whereas the goods were actually 'copper complex' which is alleged by Revenue to be a Synthetic Organic Derivative classifiable under the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff Item 14D.2.2 The assessee was also alleged to have manufactured a product viz Kalogen Brill Blue 3K without intimation to the department and without filing classification and clearing the same in the guise of BL 3SL.2.3 A Show Cause Notice was therefore issued for violation of various provisions of the Central Excise Rules and demanding duty...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)
..... mills have been sold as per the details submitted in the affidavit dated 12th september, 2005. the remaining two mills namely india united mill no. 2 and 3 and new hind textile mill have been earmarked for the mcgm and mhada as approved by respondent no. 2.(f) it is submitted that the sale of 5 mils have taken place after ..... definition the guarantee of fundamental human rights. the 'development' is not related only to the growth of gnp, in the classic work - 'development as freedom' the nobel prize winner amartya sen pointed out that 'the issue of development cannot be separated from the conceptual framework of human right'. this idea is also part of the un declaration on the right to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR347; 2006(1)MhLj308
A.P. Deshpande, J. 1. The petitioner by filing the instant petition, is challenging an order passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik, rejecting the tribe claim of the petitioner to 'Mannerwarlu', Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner came to be selected for being appointed as Police Sub-Inspector consequent upon his selection by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission against a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe. Maharashtra Public Service Commission recommended the name of the petitioner for being appointed as Police Sub-Inspector and accordingly the petitioner came to be appointed in the said post. The petitioner was selected by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission in the examination held in the year 1987 and the petitioner was communicated about the same vide letter dated 4-4-1988. The petitioner was then sent for practical training and on successful completion of the training, joined regular service under the State with effect from 13-6-1989.2. Th...
Tag this Judgment!