Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1989MP279; 1988MPLJ301
..... to the named arbitrator m/s. indian chamber of commerce, bombay. the suit was allowed and the matter was referred to the named arbitrator on 4-5-1979. thereafter hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited (nationalisation) ordinance, 1980 was promulgated on 25-10-1980 which was subsequently made act no. 70/1980 -- by notification dt. 28-10-1980 the central ..... objected that the present respondent 2 had no locus standi to intervene as no claim has been preferred by the petitioner against the corporation. the delhi high court held that hind cycles ltd, as a company, is not nationalised but only its two undertakings manufacturing bicycles and accessories. section 5{1) recognises survival of such company after nationalisation and the ..... .1. the petitioner is seeking a declaration that provisions of hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited (nationalisation) act, 1980, (hereinafter referred to as act no. 70/1980) are ultra vires of the constitution and is also seeking a writ in the nature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1988MP181; 1988MPLJ266
..... companies so that fresh capital could be invested by government. the preamble says that the act is to provide for acquisition of the undertakings of hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited with a view to securing the proper management of such undertakings so as to subserve the interests of the general public by ensuring the ..... a and b merely because the act is included in item no. 88 in the 9th schedule of the constitution. immediately after the judgment was delivered, hind cycles ltd. and sen-raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) ordinance, 1980, was promulgated on 25-10-1980 which was subsequently made act no. 70 of 1980, taking over the management ..... is also disposed of as common questions are involved and similar reliefs claimed. in both these petitions the petitioners are seeking a declaration that provisions of hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited (nationalisation) act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as act no. 70 of 1980) are ultra vires of the constitution and are also seeking .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR472; (1995)ILLJ525Bom; 1995(1)MhLj140
..... to the benefit of continued employment and back wages etc., from the date of their purported termination onwards in view of the provisions contained in section 13(1) of hind cycles ltd. and sen-raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980. by the said award, the industrial tribunal has directed the petitioner to pay all such benefits to the concerned employees who are alive and ..... /retrenchment shall have to be treated as void ab initio and non-est for all purposes. 5. on 27th december, 1980 the hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980 was passed. prior thereto the management of the undertaking of hind cycles limited was taken over by the central government, under the provisions of industries (development and regulation) act, 1951. under section 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1995Cal73
..... under the industrial development and regulation act. the said 1976 collaboration agreement was entered into when sen raleigh was under the management of the government of india. 10. there was an ordinance called hind cycle limited and sen raleigh limited (nationalisation) ordinance 1980, where-under the undertaking of sen raleigh was nationalised and by virtue of notifications issued under the said nationalisation act, the undertaking ..... of sen raleigh stood transferred to and vested in c.c.i.l. (the appellant) with effect from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ14Cal
..... the cycle corporation of india ltd. (for short corporation), was protected by section ..... an ordinance promulgated by the president of india the undertakings of sen raleigh limited were taken over by the central government under the hind cycles limited and sen raleigh limited (nationalisation) ordinance, 1980. the said ordinance was replaced by the hind cycles ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980. the service condition of the employees of sen raleigh ltd., whose services were transferred to and contained in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1183Cal
..... i fail to find any substance in this contention. the terms and conditions of the service of the workmen being governed by the statutory provision, namely, the hind cycle and sen raleigh (nationalisation) act, 1980, the matter comes under domain of public law. contention of mr. das accordingly cannot be accepted.15. though not seriously still the ..... the statutory right of the workmen of protection of their basic pay, which is a condition of their service in terms of section 13 of the hind cycles ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980. secondly ad-hoc payment having been allowed from march 1992 which was merged with basic pay from april 1995 ..... to the disadvantage of the workmen without giving to themany opportunity of being heard offends the principles of natural justice. my attention was also drawn to the hind cycles ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980 where in section 13(1) it is laid down that 'every person who has been, immediately before the appointed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR470; (2002)4BOMLR473; [2002(95)FLR751]; (2002)IIILLJ787Bom; 2002(2)MhLj850
..... of section 25f of theindustrial disputes act, 1947. during the pendency ofthe references, the hind cycles limited and sen-raleighlimited (nationalisation) act, 1980 (hereinafterreferred to as 'nationalisation act') was enacted. twocompanies, hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limitedwere nationalised and their assets vested in theappellant from the appointed day i.e. ..... analogous to res judicata being applicableto the award of the industrial tribunal is devoid ofany substance. the first reference made in 1975 wasbetween hind cycles limited and the individualworkman. the labour courts while making the awardswere circumscribed by the dispute referred to them andhave held in those references ..... in reference (it) no. 40 of 1984granting continued employment to the workmen with theappellant from the date of termination of theirservices with hind cycles limited. the learnedcounsel also faintly submitted that the appellant wasnot in a position to defend themselves in thereference as records of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR370; [2005(106)FLR154]; 2005(2)MhLj980a
..... india in 1974 under the industries development regulation act. subsequently, on 15th october, 1980 the government of india took over the undertaking under the hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited nationalization act, 1980. the services of the workmen were continued in the employment of the corporation upon nationalization. government of india is ..... the period between 1st january, 1999 and 31st december, 1999.3. the petitioner before the court is the national bicycle corporation of india limited. hind cycles limited which was run by the birla group of industries had a factory at worli, mumbai, in which the manufacture of bicycles and bicycle parts was ..... stated to have taken a decision to close-down the company with effect from 21st january, 2001.4. the first respondent joined the employment of hind cycles limited .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561
Mukerji, J.1. On receipt of some information an Excise Inspector with a raiding party went to a certain place and on making a search there seized a bundle which was found to contain seven seers of opium valued at Rs. 1,050. He arrested three persons one of whom was one Amin Shariff (appellant in appeal No. 262), and another, one Jahabir Singh (Appellant in appeal No. 379), both of whom have been convicted by the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta under Section 9, Opium Act (l of 1878). These two men are said to have made confessions to the Excise Inspector. At the hearing of the appeals which the accused persons have preferred to this Court, a question having arisen as to whether the said confessions are admissible in law, in view of the provisions of Section 25, Evidence Act, the Division Bench which was dealing with the appeals, has made this reference.2. The question referred runs in these words:Is an Excise officer, who, in the conduct of investigation of an offence against th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1951All257
..... having no particular ground, for claiming such performance, will not be sufficient grounds for granting a mandamus. [r. v. london city assessment committee, (1907) 2 k.b. 764; jatindra mohan sen v. h.e. a. cotton : air1925cal48 .459. not only must it appear that the applicant is himself a person having a real interest in the performance of the duty sought .....
Tag this Judgment!