Harry - Judgment Search Results

Harry Gupta and anr. Vs. the Madras Port Trust Represented by Its Chai ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1986)1MLJ73

n m chandurkar c j 1 the two appellants in these two appeals had filed two separate writ petitions challenging...

Pernsley Vs. Harris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... defendants are officials of philadelphia in the case now before us respondent harris an inmate who admits he is a member of the same class ..... garth agreed that while colorado river did not support abstention younger v harris 401 u s 37 1971 mandated it i do not believe that ..... 965 1985 474 u s 965 irene pernsley et al v martin harris et al no 84 1955 supreme court of the united states november .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. MartIn and Harris P. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1985)49CTR(Cal)34,[1985]154ITR460(Cal)

dipak kumar sen j 1 m s martin harris p ltd calcutta the assessee was assessed to income tax in the assessment year 1968 .....

C.K. Narayana Chary and ors. Vs. Pothepalli Ashanna and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC317; 1985(2)SCALE783; (1986)1SCC9; [1985]Supp3SCR161; 1986(1)LC56(SC)

p n bhagwati c j 1 the notification under sub section 1 of section 4 of the land acquisition act...

Mills Music, Inc. Vs. Snyder

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the required statutory notice footnote 11 mills directly or through the harry fox agency inc issued over 400 licenses to record companies authorizing ..... motions for summary judgment the district court entered judgment for mills harry fox agency inc v mills music inc 543 f supp ..... licenses to the record companies the record companies would be infringers harry fox agency inc v mills music inc 543 f supp .....

Oregon Vs. Elstad

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a confession is used to impeach the defendant s trial testimony harris v new york 401 u s 222 1971 and where miranda ..... george ed 1967 remarks of professor yale kamisar see also dershowitz ely harris v new york some anxious observations on the candor and logic ..... for impeachment purposes on cross examination harris v new york 401 u s 222 1971 the court in harris rejected as an extravagant extension of .....

Vincent Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... confinement and that he is deprived of his freedom contrary to law harris v nelson 394 u s 286 292 1087 1969 because the ..... of habeas claims including full opportunity for presentation of the relevant facts harris v nelson supra 394 u s at 298 particular care is of ..... court to provide the necessary facilities and procedures for an adequate inquiry harris v nelson supra 394 u s at 300 vincent s claims .....

PA. Bur. of Corr. Vs. Marshals Svc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... york telephone co supra at 434 u s 171 as well as harris v nelson 394 u s 286 394 u s 299 1969 and ..... in the present case the traditional writ ad testificandum is sufficient similarly harris v nelson 394 u s 286 1969 held that the district court ..... except by use of an extraordinary writ new york telephone price and harris afforded resort to the all writs act to fill statutory interstices we .....

Pratibha Rani Vs. Suraj Kumar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC628; 1985CriLJ817; 1985(1)Crimes614(SC); [1985]155ITR190(SC); 1985(1)SCALE458; (1985)2SCC370; [1985]3SCR191

..... was the result of entrustment therefore as rightly pointed out by harris c j the prosecution must establish that dominion over the assets ..... was the result of entrustment therefore as rightly pointed out by harris c j the prosecution must establish that dominion over the ..... was the result of entrustment therefore as rightly pointed out by harris c j the prosecution must establish that dominion over the .....

Black Vs. Romano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of probation in a constitutionally unfair manner as we observed in another context in harris v rivera 454 u s 339 454 u s 344 345 n 11 1981 ..... explanation of the reasons for a decision are the exception rather than the rule harris v rivera 454 u s 339 454 u s 344 1981 per curiam at ..... supra at 452 u s 472 stevens j dissenting footnote 12 see e g harris v rivera 454 u s 339 454 u s 344 345 n 11 1981 .....