Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: harry

Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, (Maharashtra) Section 4

Title: Definitions

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1948

.....under requisition were not covered by definition 'premises'.- M/s. Martin & Harris v. State of Maharashtra, 1980 Bom. C.R. 39. Intended to be let - The premises which were Jet any time prior to the coming into force of Bom. Land Requisition Act, 1948 are premises "intended to be let" within the meaning of section 4(3) of the Act and liable to be requisitioned notwithstanding that they had been let as the date of the Act came into force nor have been let since.- State v. Kulsumbai Jafferali Padamsi, ILR 1959 Bom. 982 : 1959 Bom. L.R. 263. Premises and part of the building- From the date of the enforcement of the Act, every building comes within the expression 'premises' and that a part of a building comes within the expression if it is let or "if it is intended to be let separately on that date".- Mangibai v. State, 1966 Mah. L.J. 1186. __________________ 1. Clause (A-1) was inserted by Mah. 35 of 1981, section 2. 2. This word was substituted for the word "Provincial" by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //