Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: harryBombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, (Maharashtra) Section 4
Title: Definitions
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1948
.....under requisition were not covered by definition 'premises'.- M/s. Martin & Harris v. State of Maharashtra, 1980 Bom. C.R. 39. Intended to be let - The premises which were Jet any time prior to the coming into force of Bom. Land Requisition Act, 1948 are premises "intended to be let" within the meaning of section 4(3) of the Act and liable to be requisitioned notwithstanding that they had been let as the date of the Act came into force nor have been let since.- State v. Kulsumbai Jafferali Padamsi, ILR 1959 Bom. 982 : 1959 Bom. L.R. 263. Premises and part of the building- From the date of the enforcement of the Act, every building comes within the expression 'premises' and that a part of a building comes within the expression if it is let or "if it is intended to be let separately on that date".- Mangibai v. State, 1966 Mah. L.J. 1186. __________________ 1. Clause (A-1) was inserted by Mah. 35 of 1981, section 2. 2. This word was substituted for the word "Provincial" by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial