Harmonize - Judgment Search Results

Harmonic Foods and anr. Vs. the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and o ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2002]112CompCas445(Kar); 2002(5)KarLJ559

orderchandrashekaraiah j 1 the petitioners in this writ petition have challenged the order dated 30 8 2001 passed by the...

Eldred Vs. Ashcroft

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ibid i n an era of multinational publishers and instantaneous electronic transmission the court said harmonization in this regard has obvious practical benefits and is a necessary and proper measure to ..... at 245 he would invalidate the ctea as irrational in part because in his view harmonizing the united states and european union baseline copyright terms apparent ly fails to achieve significant .....

Ashish Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)LC646Tri(Mum.)bai

..... product is classifiable under heading 59 06 hence the appeal 3 heading 59 07 of harmonized system of nomenclature at the relevant time read textile fabrics otherwise impregnated coated or covered ..... 59 06 of the tariff corresponds with some modifications with heading 59 07 of the harmonized system of nomenclature the explanatory notes to this heading also provide that impregnation and coating .....

Deputy Cit Vs. Triveni Engineering Works Ltd..

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)88TTJ(Del)165

..... the deemed taxable income to be carried forward in order to ensure that interpretation is harmonized in the spirit of the provisions the interpolation is not justified in clear language of ..... and 2 of section 115j had to be read together and the interpretation should be harmonized in the spirit of the provision in sub section 1 the mandate is to calculate .....

N. Adithayan Vs. the Travancore Devaswom Board and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3538; 2003(1)ALD28(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)843; 95(2003)CLT504(SC); JT2002(8)SC51; 2002(3)KLT615(SC); (2002)8SCC106; [2002]SUPP3SCR76

..... to some limitations or regulations and one such would be inherent in the process of harmonizing the right conferred by article 25 2 b with that protected by article 26 b ..... or classes of society were also considered to need due regulation in the process of harmonizing the various rights the vision of the founding fathers of constitution to liberate the society .....

Neel Controls Vs. Commissioner of Customs and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT429Tri(Mum.)bai

..... classification 3 both these headings are verbatim reproduction of the relevant heading in the harmonized system of nomenclature therefore reference to the explanatory notes to determine the scope of ..... these headings is justified the notes to heading 90 32 in the harmonized system of nomenclature explanatory notes specifically include in this heading automatic regulators of electrical .....

Gisbrecht Vs. Barnhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the litigation was not substantially justified 28 u s c 2412 d 1 a congress harmonized fees payable by the government under eaja with fees payable under 406 b out of ..... s fees by the government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication congress harmonized fees payable by the government under eaja with fees payable under 406 b out of .....

State of A.P. Vs. National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1895; JT2002(Suppl1)SC254; 2002(4)SCALE7; (2002)5SCC203; [2002]3SCR278; [2002]127STC280(SC)

..... any between entry 53 and entry 54 ceases to exist and the two can be harmonized and read together because electricity is goods it is covered in entry 54 also it ..... constitution bench has held that the same rules of construction apply for the purpose of harmonizing an apparent conflict between two entries in the same list what is inter state sale .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gulshan Kumar

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... does not cross swords with the main purpose highlighted earlier the effort must be to harmonize the two instead of allowing the exclusion clause to snipe successfully at the main purpose .....

Tube Investments of India Limited Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Office ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2003]129STC238(Mad)

..... a higher rate of tax by changing the description of the goods 12 in the harmonized commodity description and coding system which is adopted in the central excise tariff tubes and .....