Harmonize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: harmonize Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 7,707 results (0.069 seconds)Cook Vs. Gralike
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-2001
..... pending respondent gralike withdrew from the 1998 election and respondent harmon a nonincumbent candidate in the 2000 republican congressional primary in ..... district of missouri intervened as an appellee in view of harmon s participation there is no contention that this case is ..... and no one questions the standing of respondents gralike and harmon to raise a first amendment challenge to such laws article .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-09-2001
Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT453TriDel
..... reported decision on rule 3 b of the general rules for the interpretation of the harmonized system in view of the difference of opinion expressed by the two coordinate bench the ..... explanatory note v to rule 1 of the general rules for the interpretation of the harmonized system reads as follows in provision iii b the expression provided such headings or notes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorfolk Shipbuilding and Drydock Corp. Vs. Garris
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-2001
..... federal common lawmaking in admiralty that law is to be developed insofar as possible to harmonize with the enactments of congress in the field american dredging co v miller 510 u ..... admiralty as a shared venture in which federal common lawmaking does not stand still but harmonize s with the enactments of congress in the field ante at 820 quoting american dredging .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWhitman Vs. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-27-2001
..... that subpart 2 does not supplant implementation provisions for revised ozone standards this interpretation fully harmonizes subpart 2 with ep a s clear authority to revise any naaqs id at 71 ..... than subpart 2 the district of columbia circuit ultimately agreed that subpart 2 could be harmonized with the ep a s authority to promulgate revised naaqs but not because subpart 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. P. Venkata Lakshmi Vs. Dr. Y. Savitha Devi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-25-2001
..... reddy gynaecologist and obstetrician her family doctor and on her advice she had been taking harmons injections from 25 9 1992 to avoid miscarriage she had rescanned which showed normal single ..... august 1992 she was under the advice of dr nirmala reddy and had been taking harmons injections to avoid miscarriage u s scan was done periodically to observe the growth of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Luminous Electronics Vs. Cce, New Delhi
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2001
..... gets regulated uninterrupted energy with pre determined constant voltage and frequency 5 opinion given by harmonized system committee on uninterruptible power supply apparatus falling under chapter heading 8504 is as ..... volt ampere output volt ampere battery volt and output frequency this opinion of the harmonized system committee has lot of weight and should ordinarily be taken as binding vide .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtlantic Spinning and Weaving Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-02-2001
Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT324Tri(Mum.)bai
..... bale heading 55 03 at page 760 amp 761 of the explanatory notes to the harmonized commodity description amp coding system which covers synthetic staple fibres not carded combed or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandanben Chunilal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-23-2001
Reported in: (2002)4GLR3502
..... same statute or between two provisions of different statutes an attempt should be made to harmonize both the provisions as endeavour should be made to see that no absurd result follows .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsmaco Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-03-2001
..... that by virtue of note 7 to chapter 48 of the explanatory notes to the harmonized system of nomenclature crape paper of a certain width is classifiable under heading 48 23 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLic of India Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-20-2001
Reported in: (2002)82ITD749(Mum.)
..... observes that i the words should be understood in the sense in which they best harmonize with the subject of the enactment and the object which the legislature has in view .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial