Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: gram nyayalayas act 2008 section 29 proceeding to be in the official language of the state Page 8 of about 243 results (0.174 seconds)

Aug 03 1950 (HC)

State Government Vs. Jang Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1951CriLJ36

..... is not negatived by a new act of will opposed to that under which possession of the thing originally continued (ita nulla amittatur, nisi in qua, utrumaque in contrarium actum est-digest l. 17. l): see sir ..... the railway in disposing of the goods can part not only with possession but also with ownership. but in the case of disposal by destruction there can be no fresh act of pretension till the reproduction of the animus possidendi is rendered impossible or there exists a contrary animus not to possess the thing. possession thus continues so long as it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2013 (HC)

M.A.Aliyar Vs. Nellikuzhi Grama Panchayath

Court : Kerala

..... -p3 true copy of the complaint dated183.2013. ext.p4 true copy of the information obtained from the ist respondent under the rti act dt.26.4.2013. ext.p5true copy of the information obtained from the2d respondent under the rti act dt.26.4.2013. ext.p6 true copy of the judgment in wpc.12774 of2013ext.p7 true copy of the restraint order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2008 (HC)

Bablu Alias Mahendra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1856

..... evidence. firstly the extrajudicial confession made by appellant bablu to virendra kumar (pw-24) and gopal das (pw-26); secondly his memorandum statement under section 27 of the evidence act ex. p/32 dated 26-9-97 leading to recovery; and thirdly identification of appellants of connected appeals, namely, anil alias babbi and satish alias bhura by complainant keshav ..... stone embossed.(ii) one idol of goddess durga ji embossed on the wood of walnut.32. ex. p/16 is the memorandum statement under section 27 of the evidence act of appellant satish alias bhura and on the basis of his disclosure statement vide recovery memo ex. p/18 dated 3-2-1996 following articles were seized from the ..... hostile. these witnesses are also the witnesses to the recovery memo ex. p/19.36. the witnesses to memorandum statement ex. p/16 under section 27 of the evidence act of appellant satish alias bhura are ramesh (pw-19) and raj kumar (pw-12) and they are the witnesses of recovery memo ex. p/18. the witnesses to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2005 (SC)

Kamalanantha and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2132; (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN41; 2005(3)CTC764; JT2005(4)SC170; (2005)5SCC194

..... dignity and modesty. she had stated that many girls had to undergo abortion because of the rapes committed on them by the swami. she had alleged that one balan had acted as a pimp for the swami. she had requested for an appropriate action against the swami, divya devi and balan. the subsequent news report on these allegations was followed ..... there was torrential flow of tears even while she was recalling the incident. during the examination she could not control herself when she was questioned whether she consented for the act committed on her. nothing could be more perverse than to reject the testimony of this victim girl.'28. p.w.13 vanitha was examined on 5.7.1996. her ..... new), the court then said at p.335 (2) scr as under:-'in this state of law, the parliament has intervened to set at rest the conflict by passing act xxvi of 1955 making a separate provision in respect of errors, omissions or irregularities in a charge and also enlarging the meaning of the expression such errors etc. so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

Rajesh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2559

..... in india and the witnesses cannot be branded as liar. while dealing with the same question in the matter of dalbir singh v. state of haryana : 2008 air scw 3957 : 2008 cri lj 3061 it has been held by the apex court that maxim - falsus in uno falsus in omnibus i.e. false in one thing, false ..... demonstrably incorrect or doubtful. the astute judge can separate the grains of acceptable truth from the chaff of exaggeration and improbabilities which cannot be safely prudently accepted or acted upon. it is sound commonsense to refuse to apply mechanically, in assessing the worth of necessarily imperfect human testimony, the maxim: 'falsus in uno falsus in ..... and contradictions. the court is required to separate the grains of acceptable truth from the chaff of exaggerations and improbabilities which cannot be safely or prudently accepted and acted upon. while dealing with the same question in the matter of laxman v. state of maharashtra it has been held by the supreme court that witnesses cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2015 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Rajkumar and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner. explanation. it is immaterial in such cases which party offers the provocation or commits the first assault." 50. in the present ..... that witnesses to a serious crime may not react in a normal manner. nor do they react in uniformly. the horror stricken witnesses at a dastardly crime or an act of egregious nature may react differently. their course of conduct may not be of ordinary type in the normal circumstances. the court, therefore, cannot reject their evidence merely ..... d name of the accused was not mentioned, does not make the evidence of pw-3 unreliable. article d is not dying declaration under section 32 of the evidence act. it is not statement to police under section 161 of cr.p.c. it is also not statement to metropolitan magistrate or judicial magistrate under section 164 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2000 (HC)

Yogesh V. Brahmbhatt Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3022

..... action was taken in good faith. it was stated that on 30th september, 1999/ 1st october, 1999, applications were received from sarpanchs of ghodadara group gram panchayat and vasvel group gram panchayat requesting the range forest officer, vadodara to capture 2-3 leopards who were killing animals. similar application was made by several persons complaining that leopards ..... such occasion arises;15. in the facts and circumstances, we issue the following directions:(1) no wild animal specified in schedule i of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 shall be hunted or cause to be hunted unless such wild animal has become 'dangerous to human life' or is 'so disabled or diseased as to be ..... hence, are not believable and cannot be accepted.14. at the same time, however, with a view to ensure that in future, the provisions of the act are observed in letter and spirit and no animal specified in schedule i is captured except in accordance with law, we consider it appropriate to issue certain directions .....

Tag this Judgment!

1892

Mcpherson Vs. Blacker

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for upon a general ticket, nor that the majority of those who exercise the elective franchise can alone choose the electors. it recognizes that the people act through their representatives in the legislature, and leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method of effecting the object. the framers of the ..... one representative, the election should be by districts. it has never been doubted that representatives in congress thus chosen represented the entire people of the state acting in their sovereign capacity. by original clause three, section one, article ii, and by the twelfth amendment, which superseded that clause in case of a ..... defined boundaries and organized under a government sanctioned and limited by a written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed." the state does not act by its people in their collective capacity, but through such political agencies as are duly constituted and established. the legislative power is the supreme authority, except .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... years from their irreclaimable parents and place them in specially established reformatory settlements .163 160 criminal tribes (lower provinces) act extension act, 1876 161 ibid 162 the criminal tribes enquiry committee report (1949-50), https://ia802807.us.archive.org/11/ ..... provision, holding that it suffers from incurable fixations of stereotype morality and conception of sexual role. it was held 53 (2008) 3 scc125 part vi that [n].o law in its ultimate effect should end up perpetuating the oppression of women ..... manuals and the legacy of discrimination ........................................ 105 xv. model prison manual 2016: whether adequate?. ......................................... 125 xvi. model prisons and correctional services act, 2023 ..................................... 132 xvii. the continued targeting of denotified tribes .............................................. 134 xviii. the role of legal service authorities in prisons....................................... 138 xix. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1979 (HC)

Shankar Dass Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1980HP5

..... . he may submit his reply to the stay application within two weeks, during which time the petitioner shall not be removed from the office of the pradhan gram panchayat, nalag, if already not removed.'7. thereafter the respondents have filed reply to the writ petition controverting the allegations made by the petitioner. the petitioner ..... endorsed to different persons on 6th nov., 1978.4. now the contention of the petitioner is that according to section 54 of the himachal pradesh panchayati raj act 1968, it was necessary for the government to conduct an enquiry before taking the impugned action. in the original writ petition which is filed by the petitioner, ..... to disqualify the petitioner from contesting panchayat election for five years and also to dispense with his services as a president of gram panchayat, nalag, under section 57 of the himachal pradesh panchayati raj act 1968. this order is passed on the basis of an enquiry conducted and the subsequent show cause notice of oct., 1978 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //