Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: gram nyayalayas act 2008 section 29 proceeding to be in the official language of the state Page 7 of about 243 results (0.135 seconds)

Gram Panchayat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT335

..... and by the learned single judge confirming the aforesaid order and submitted that in fact no show-cause notice was issued to the respondent no. 2 by the gram panchayat. this fact was specifically raised before the sub divisional officer, who without verifying the factual correctness of the issuance of notice to the respondent no. 2 recorded ..... 24-3-2006, even then the additional commissioner ought to have extended opportunity to the petitioner cum appellant. after allowing the application under section 5 of the limitation act, the additional commissioner ought to have issued notice to the appellant herein for hearing of the case on merits. but all this was not considered by the ..... k.k. lahoti, j.1. this appeal is directed under section 2 of the m.p. uchcha nyayalaya khand nyaypeeth ko appeal adhiniyam, 2005, assailing the order dated 17-1-2008 passed by the learned single judge in writ petition no. 5692/2006 (s) by which the writ petition preferred by the petitioner challenging the order .....

Achutanand Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... respondent no.7. the appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 10.1.2013 passed in w.p.no.4193/2008 and has approached this court by way of filing this appeal under section 2 of the madhya pradesh uchch nyayalaya (khand nyay peeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005. the writ petition was filed by the respondent no.7 herein ..... to challenge action of the respondents of issuing order dated 5.5.2006 under section 86(2) of the madhya pradesh panchayat avam gram swaraj ahiniyam, 1993 (herein after referred to as 'the act').learned single judge after obtaining the counter affidavit considered the total averments made by the parties and reached to the conclusion that the power ..... under section 86(2) of the act was wrongly exercised by the authorities. since the selection of the writ petitioner was rightly done by the gram panchayat, he was to be appointed on the post of of panchayat karmi. the earlier appointment issued in respect .....

Smt. Michu Kasde Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... shri sanjay dwivedi, learned govt. advocate for the respondents. heard on the question of admission. this writ appeal under section 2(1) of the m.p.uchcha nyayalaya (khand nyayapeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005, has been filed challenging the order dated 3.12.2012 passed in writ petition no.20101/2012, by which the learned single ..... in passing the order, impugned in this appeal by the learned single judge. as per the provisions of m.p.panchayat raj avam gram swaraj adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the act for short).the motion of no confidence was rightly passed against the appellant/petitioner as the number of members present have voted against the ..... entertain the writ petition at the admission stage. it is contended that the learned single judge has failed to appreciate that one of the member of the gram panchayat was prevented to take part in the proceedings of the meeting held for consideration of no confidence motion moved against the appellant/petitioner, who was an elected .....

Chandrakanta Bai Vs. State of M.P. Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... legally. in manila jaiwar (supra), a division bench of this court after considering various earlier pronouncements of this court has held that before removal of sarpanch of gram panchayat principles of natural justice have to be followed. the division bench noticing the fact that no witnesses of preliminary enquiry, including the complainant were examined and naturally ..... shantanu kemkar, j: 1. with consent heard finally. this writ appeal under section 2 of the madhya pradesh uchcha nyayalaya (khand nyaypeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005 (for short "the act"), is directed against the order dated 3-3-2014 passed by the learned single judge of this court in w.p. no. 1630/14. brief facts ..... distt. rajgarh. on receipt of a complaint against her, a show-cause notice, dated 18-2-2013 under section 40 of m.p. panchayat raj avam gram swaraj adhiniyam, 1993 was issued to her by the sub-divisional officer. she submitted reply of the said show-cause notice denying the allegation levelled against her. .....

Akkadian Housing and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Pantheon ...

Court : Mumbai

..... , to deviate from this practice. learned counsel, in support, relied on the case of scottish co-operative wholesale society ltd. (1958) 3 aller)and ikhil rubber (2008) 215 ctr all 332). 17.19 the clb held that there was no general proposition that a particular date alone should be chosen for valuation, though ordinarily the board ..... appeal no.19 of 2009 impugns an order passed by the company law board, principal bench ( clb ?), in the appellants petition under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956 ( act ?). the facts of the appellants case may be briefly stated thus: 2. appellant no.1 akkadian housing and infrastructure pvt. ltd. ( akkadian ?) is a private ..... to note the limits of our inquiry. in v.s. krishnan vs. westfort hitech hospital ltd. (2008) 3 supreme court cases 363) the supreme court explained the scope of the jurisdiction of the high court under section 10f of the act in the following words: 16. it is clear that section 10f permits an appeal to the high .....

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 2011). 231 un human rights council, promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development (2008). 113 part i agreements which india has ratified, including the udhr, iccpr, and the icescr. india has a constitutional duty to honour these internationally recognized rules ..... crime in the united kingdom, and was used to prosecute homosexuals where sodomy could not be proven. in 1895, oscar wilde was arrested under the act for committing acts of gross indecency with male persons .26 during wilde s trial, the prosecutor, referring to homosexual love, asked him, what is the love ..... stultify the spirit of the constitution. accordingly, the constitutional courts, while viewing the constitution as a transformative document, have ardently fulfilled their obligation to act as the sentinel on qui vive for guarding the rights of all individuals irrespective of their sex, choice and sexual orientation.99. the purpose of .....

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... exercise of free speech, generally by mandating a horizontally applicable parliamentary law or legal regime, the answer would be a self-evident negative. 61 the limited liability partnership act, 2008 3 6 63. there is no difficulty about the right of two consenting persons to decide to live together, to co-habit with each other, and create their ..... with rent legislation which differentiated between non- 75 1984 (1) scr594 76 section 32, clause (b) of andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1954 77 1986 (2) scr59678 2008 (6) scr5664 7 residential and residential buildings, in respect of the remedy of eviction, on ground of bona fide requirement.85. in all the judgments cited ..... sma must be read in a gender-neutral 143 part d manner. in fourie (supra), the common law definition of marriage and section 30(1) of the marriage act (act 25 of 1961)172 were challenged. the common law definition of marriage in south africa is that it is a union of one man with one woman, to .....

Commissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9

Court : Allahabad

..... not seem to correct or at least, extends to no help to respondent. 106 admittedly, vitamin and pro-vitamins are used in little amount as 1-2 gram per tone. under the customs act, the goods are notified. in case substantial portion of a goods is notified good, like vitamin-e in the present case, then it cannot be treated ..... court vide calcutta discount company 1961 (41) itr 191 vs. ito; kesar devi (smt.) v. union of india and others reported in 2003 (7) scc 427; 2008 (3) cri lj 3621=2008 (14) scc 186, aslam mohammad merchant v. competent authority. 90.once a statement was recorded by the revenue in which a witness had confessed that goods are of ..... process of devising the means necessary to commit a crime." 104. both the aforesaid words, in stroud's judicial dictionary of words and phrases, south asian edition, 2008 vol.3, have been defined as under: preparation, "preparation for... an intended building" (building (safety, health and welfare) regulations 1948 (no.1145. reg.2 (1) includes any .....

indore Development Authority Vs. Shri Ram Builders and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP169

..... by the learned single judge in writ petition no. 14605/ 2006, the present intra-court appeal has been preferred under section 2(1) of the m. p. uchcha nyayalaya (khand nyaypeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005. the writ appeal was heard by a division bench which referred to the facts in issue, the provisions contained in the m. ..... p. nagar tatha gram nivesh adhiniyam, 1973 (for short 'the act') especially section 50 of the said enactment, the stand and stance taken by the contesting parties and the interveners, the view expressed by the learned ..... single judge and the interpretation placed by him on the proviso added to sub-section (4) of section 50 of the act by the m.p. nagar tatha gram nivesh (sansodhan) adhiniyam, 2004 on 29-12-2004, the interpretation sought to be placed by the learned senior counsel appearing for the indore development .....

Govind Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1244

..... as the case of acquitted respondents is concerned, p. w. 1 kamlesh has also received one abrasion and other witnesses have not received any injury. the act of govind was found to be an isolated act for causing the injury by fire arm to the deceased.18. thus, trial court has convicted appellant govind on the basis of ocular as well as .....