Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: gram nyayalayas act 2008 section 29 proceeding to be in the official language of the state Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3 results (0.827 seconds)

NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. the Joint Secretary, Panchayats, Punjab Exer ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR179

..... the matter became final between the parties and the mutation was sanctioned in favour of owners. subsequently, punjab village common lands (regulation) act was amended by punjab act 19 of 1976. the gram panchayat filed an application for being declared owner and for ejectment. it was held that the decree passed prior to amendment by competent civil ..... : air2000sc3272 , this being a collusive decree, could be challenged in the later proceedings which were initiated by the gram panchayat-respondent by moving an application under section 4 read with section 2(g)(4) of the act before the district development officer, amritsar. he further argued that as ruled by the hon'ble supreme court in re ..... court did not have the power to entertain the suit as the jurisdiction under section 13 of the act was barred. the consolidation scheme as well as sanctioning of the above mutation in favour of the gram panchayat could have been brought to the pointed notice of the court only by the then sarpanch of the .....

inder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... passed by the divisional deputy director, panchayat exercising the powers of collector under the aforesaid act. the gram panchayat initiated the proceedings under section 7 of the act against the petitioners herein which were adjourned sine die with liberty to the gram panchayat to seek ownership declared from the competent court. thereafter, the panchayat filed a ..... section 2(g)(1) read with section 4 of the act. such similar entries have been interpreted by the division bench of this court in tek ram and others versus gram sabha, manakpur and others 1976 plj628and shiv charan singh and others versus gram panchayat narike and another 1977 plj453and other judgment in cwp no ..... the petitioners resisted the proceedings under section 11 of the act on the basis of the decree of the civil court granted on 11.05.1972 declaring the present petitioners to be owners of the suit land. the learned collector relied upon the judgment in gram panchayat naulakha and ujjagar singh and others (2000) 7 .....

“defendants in their Written Statement Admitted the Fact of Vs. Gram ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to get favourable finding and interim orders. vide order dated 13.03.1984, the application under sections 7 and 11 of the 1961 act, had been allowed regarding 29 bighas 10 biswas of land and the gram panchayat was declared owner of the same and ejectment had been ordered. the said order had been upheld in appeal vide order dated ..... the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.2488 of 1987 -11- 17. the apex court in ram singh vs. gram panchayat, mehal kalan 1986 (4) scc364has held as under: 4. section 11 of the act provides that any person claiming right, title or interest in any land vested or deemed to have been vested in a panchayat ..... who filed another suit on 21.05.1982, for permanent injunction, which was decreed on 17.05.1984, in his favour. thereafter, gram panchayat filed proceedings under the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as '1961 act') and respondent no.2 passed an order on 07.10.1986 holding that the land in dispute vested in the .....

C.W.P. No. 6869 of 1986 Vs. Joint Director Panchayats-cum-commissioner ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... can seek the eviction of an unauthorised occupant of 'jumla mushtarka malkan' land by resort to the proceedings under the 1973 act or under the punjab gram panchayat (common purposes land) eviction and rent recovery act, 1976. a reference in this context can be made to a division bench judgment of this court in 'mithu singh and ..... consider the plea of the petitioners that as the earlier petition under section 7 of the 1961 act, filed by the gram panchayat has already been dismissed after trial, the proceedings under the 1973 act are not tenable. counsel for the gram panchayat, on the other hand, submits that as the land is admittedly 'mushtarka malkan' ..... under sections 4 and 5 of the punjab public premises land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1973 (for brevity, the 1973 act ).the gram panchayat of village tarain, tehsil and district patiala, filed an application under sections 4 and 5 of the 1973 act, seeking ejectment of the petitioners from the land, in dispute. the collector, patiala, .....

Mehar Singh and Others Vs. the Joint Director Panchayats Punjab and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and the mutation of the land in dispute has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioners.the proceedings under section 7 of the 1961 act have also been decided against the gram panchayat by the assistant collector ist grade, patiala vide order dated 19.3.1975 (annexure p-5).it is argued that despite several ..... -8) passed by the joint director panchayats, punjab (exercising the powers of commissioner ) under the punjab village common lands (regulation)act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 1961 act .) whereby the appeal filed by the gram panchayat, ratta khera, has been allowed and the order passed by the collector (d.d.p.o.) patiala, dismissing the petition ..... to decide a question of title. the only authority empowered to decide whether land vests or does not vest in a gram panchayat is the collector exercising power under section 11 of the 1961 act. the petitioners.therefore, cannot seek any aid to their case from orders passed by the consolidation authorities. the petitioners have .....

Gurdial Singh and Others Vs. Joint Director Panchayats (Exercising Pow ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... exercising the powers of commissioner) thereby allowing the petition filed by jagir singh under section 11 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 1961 act .) declaring gram panchayat village, kachhwa, tehsil and district, patiala as owner of the land in dispute and dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioners. ..... jagir singh had no locus standi to file the petition as he did not raise any issue contemplated under section 11 of the aforesaid act. counsel for the contesting respondent-gram panchayat village kachhwa contends that the petitioners failed to adduce any evidence to prove that the land in dispute is excluded from shamlat ..... decree passed by the civil court has no effect on the ownership rights of the panchayat. however, the gram panchayat was given liberty to file a separate application under section 7 of the 1961 act to recover possession of the land in dispute. feeling aggrieved from the order passed by the collector, the .....

Date of Decision: April 2, 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... operational in the state of punjab. it has been stated that upon the recommendations of this court, the state government has also notified for starting two gram nayayalayas one at nangal, district ropar and the other at kot isse khan, district moga. that apart, this court has been apprised that decisions ..... territories are directed to establish women' helpline in various cities and towns, so as to curb eve-teasing within three months. 6) suitable boards cautioning such act of eve-teasing be exhibited in all public places including precincts of educational institutions, bus stands, railway stations, cinema theatres, parks, beaches, public service vehicles, ..... that maximum physical abuse against women in the nature of beatings etc. have cultural acceptance, the state governments should appoint protection officers under domestic violence act upto the village level so as to create awareness and render assistance to the concerned distressed women. ix)public transport must have police personnels so .....

Suraj Bhan and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)141PLR66

..... village are the grounds of permitting this exchange. the tehsildar in his report dated 14.3.1996 has mentioned that land of the companies being offered to gram panchayat is 'nala'. keeping in view the situation of both lands the value of the land being exchanged is equal.'12. from the chronological events and ..... the petitioners before passing the said order. it has been contended that the petitioners had filed an application dated 26.6.1997 against the latest resolution of the gram panchayat dated 30.5.1997 before said respondent had directed the additional deputy commissioner, gurgaon, to inquire into the allegations made in the application. the district ..... officer, gurgaon (d.d.p.o.) was also directed to examine the resolution dated 30.5,1997 passed by the gram panchayat with regard to the provisions of section 47 of the haryana panchayati raj act, 1994. it has further been contended that the petitioners had submitted written submissions before respondent no. 1. without considering the .....

Kaptan and Another Vs. Balwan Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by respondents no.1 to 3 herein as his legal representatives) was dismissed by the trial court, but was decreed by first appellate court directing defendant no.1 gram panchayat (respondent no.4 herein) to remove encroachment from the land of the plaintiff. accordingly, respondents 1 to 3 filed execution petition for execution of the said ..... while decreeing the suit of respondents no.1 to 3, wrongly relied on order passed by collector in proceedings under the punjab village common lands (regulations) act, 1961 (in short the act). the contention cannot be accepted. decree passed by the first appellate court, which is sought to be executed, has not been set aside by any ..... for the appellants is completely fallacious, misconceived and meritless. 5. learned counsel for the appellants, relying on a judgment of hon'ble supreme court in the case of gram panchayat of village naulakha vs. ujagar singh reported as 2000 (4) r. c. r. (civil) 749, contended that possession of part of the public street is .....

The Gram Panchayat of Village Lathron Vs. Sadhu Ram (Died) Through Lrs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . i have considered the rival contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties. be that as it may, fact remains that the property belongs to the gram panchayat regarding which declaration is being sought. otherwise also, no prejudice will be caused to the respondent/plaintiffs if the application dated 4.8.2005 for setting ..... ex parte order dated 20.11.2004, has been dismissed. learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that the property in question is a public property and gram panchayat is owning and managing the same. learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that suit is barred under the provisions of punjab singh ravinder 2013.08 ..... the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh -2- civil revision no.1870 of 2011 village common lands (regulation) act. learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of hon'ble supreme court in gram panchayat of village naulakha versus ujagar singh, 2000(4) r.c.r.(civil) 749 to contend that public institution .....