Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed chapter i distribution of powers Page 8 of about 517 results (0.127 seconds)

State of Gujarat Vs. Saurashtra Oil Mills Association and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)1GLR375

..... according to the state government, it was empowered to pass the impugned order under clause 24(1) of the state order of ..... the petition by contending that there is no conflict between the central act and the local orders, because, the state government had passed the orders in exercise of its powers under section 3 read with section 5 of the said act read with the orders of the government of india made on 3-11-1974 and 9-6-1978 under section 3. ..... 27th july, 1998 the union minister for food and consumer affairs, government of india responded to the letter of the state minister drawing his attention to the notified order dated 9th june, 1978, by which the central government had delegated the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the act, to make necessary orders to provide for matters specified in clauses .....

Girnar Traders and Digambar Motiram Jhadhav. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the land for reasons contained in clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (1) and in accordance with the provisions of this act.20. the government/appropriate authority, other than the planning authority is vested with the powers under section 50 of the mrtp act to delete reserved or designated land from ..... are allowed subject to just exceptions and limited to this reference. legalistic federalism was introduced as a technique of governance with the people of india adopting, enacting and giving unto themselves the constitution of india on 26th november, 1949. the legislative competence of the central and state legislatures has been demarcated by the ..... responsible for indian judicial system, accepted the plea of `legislation by incorporation' and interpreted the statute accordingly in the case of secretary of state for india in council v. hindusthan co-operative insurance society ltd. [air 1931 pc 149]. this judicial pronouncement was followed in different subsequent judgments and these doctrines .....

M/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... act, 2003. 49. the act, 2003 was enacted and published in the gazette of india dated 2.6.2003. section 1 (3) provides that the act shall come into force on such date as the central government may by notification appoint. the proviso thereunder also empowers central government to enforce different provisions of act on different dates. the entire act ..... except section 121 came into force on 10.6.2003. section 185 of act ..... amount or instalments thereof and 8.4 deals with voluntary declaration of tampered meters and lastly comes para 8.5. which is general. later on government of india, ministry of power issued notification no. s.o. 790(e) dated 8.6.2005 with the "title the electricity (removal of difficulties) order .....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Venkateshan S. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1890; 2002CriLJ2790; 2002(2)Crimes271(SC); 2002(81)ECC1; JT2002(4)SC263; 2002(4)SCALE1; (2002)5SCC285; [2002]38SCL669(SC); [2002]3SCR268; 2002(2)LC892(SC)

..... granted.2. by order dated 8th february 2000, the joint secretary, ministry of finance, department of revenue, government of india made a detention order under section 3(1) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'cofeposa act') directing that one b. sankar be detained and kept in custody with a view to prevent him ..... acquire, hold, own or possess or transfer any foreign exchange, foreign security or any immovable property situated outside india, except as otherwise provided under the act. for the contravention of the act, rules and regulations, penalty is provided under section 13 of the act. this would certainly mean that dealing in foreign exchange de hors the statutory provisions, rules and regulations would be illegal .....

Swami Achyutanand Tirth and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... passed by this court, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions and observations:- i. union of india and the state governments shall take appropriate steps to implement food safety and standards act, 2006 in a more effective manner. ii. states shall take appropriate steps to inform owners of dairy, dairy ..... light of the observations made by this court. vide order dated 11.11.2014, this court observed that union of india and state governments must come out with suitable amendments in the act or with a new legislation to stop adulteration and production of synthetic milk which is consumed by the infants/children and ..... ensure that food processed, manufactured, imported or distributed is in compliance with the domestic food laws.7. exercising power under the act, central government constituted the food safety and standards authority of india (fssai). duties and functions of the food safety and standards authority have been elaborately dealt with in section 16 of the .....

Radha Govinda Swamy and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 57(1984)CLT188; 1984(I)OLR168

..... of the trust efficiently, then not withstanding any thing contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any other provision of this act, the state government may settle such land or building with the person who immediately before such vesting was an intermediary in respect of such land or building, subject to the ..... articles 25 and 26, such acts or inaction would be available to be challenged though not the law. in narendra ..... have held that the provisions of the orissa estates abolition act as amended in 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1979 do not offend either article 14 or articles 25 and 26 of the constitution of india, but if the state government so implements the provisions that is to say, if its act or inaction infringes or abridges the rights guaranteed by .....

Parekh Prints Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT456; 1992(37)ECC78; 1991LC167(Delhi); 1992(62)ELT253(Del); ILR1992Delhi304

..... year, as are specified in that schedule.' '5. expenditure to be charged on the consolidated fund of india. - any expenditure under the provisions of this act shall be expenditure charged on the consolidated fund of india.' 12. section 6 of the act grants power to the central government to make rules. section 7, which deals with the declaration of certain goods to be of special ..... the additional duties or union duties of excise are being levied and collected by the government of india by authority of law and additional duties so collected are being distributed among the states in accordance with the principles of distribution as formulated by the parliament and provided in the act. the act authorises the payment of additional duties out of the consolidated fund of .....

Mahaveer Kumar JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)191CTR(Raj)303; [2005]277ITR166(Raj)

..... permitted by the tribunal that authorities below have grossly erred in law in treating lottery income of sikkim government as taxable income under the it act, 1961.this contention had two aspects of the matter. firstly, that the sikkim was not originally a part of india when it act, 1961, was enacted. leaving aside the historical background, which does not have much bearing on the present ..... , expression 'taxable territory' has been used in place of 'india' under the act of 1961', does not make any difference, so far as enforcement of its provision within the state governed by the act which has extra-territorial reach. applicability of the act of 1922 had been extended not to whole of india, but to british india only erstwhile states forming part of indian sub-continent were .....

In the Matter Of: Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Shimla Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... including the price at which the distribution licensee of the state procures power from generating companies. (d) the electricity rules, 2005 notified by the government of india under section 176 of the act clearly indicate under rule-8 that the tariff determined by the central commission for generating stations under clause (a) or (b) of sub-section ..... had agreed to give a share from the hydro projects to himachal pradesh in lieu of government of h.p. agreeing not to do any act or permit any act to diminish the natural flow of river. according to the agreement, the government of h.p. was not to share the capital cost of the project and was ..... agreement is outside the jurisdiction of the state commission. any dispute arising between the two state governments under an agreement is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the honble supreme court of india under article 131 of the constitution of india. under this article, the jurisdiction of any other court is excluded in regard to any .....

Gangula Narasimha and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... . g.o.ms.no.747 evolving a general scheme by the government for regularization of the occupation of excess land held by the third parties: 23. the ulc act was repealed by the government of india on 22.3.1999 by the urban land (ceiling and regulation) repeal act, 1999 (act 15 of 1999) which shall come into force in the states ..... of haryana and punjab and in all the union territories on the 11th day of january, 1999 and in any other state which adopts the act under clause ..... the residence of the members of the staff of such organization: provided that the exemption under this clause shall apply only if there is an agreement between the government of india and such international organization that such land shall be so exempted. (2) the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not be construed as granting any exemption .....