Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed chapter i distribution of powers Page 6 of about 517 results (0.164 seconds)

Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Limited and Another. Vs. State of U.P. an ...

Court : Allahabad

..... or local law and it reads as under:- "5. certain laws not to be affected by this act - nothing in this act shall affect the provisions of any act for punishing mutiny and desertion of officers, soldiers, sailors or airmen in the service of the government of india or the provisions of any special or local law." 39. thus, from perusal of provisions of section ..... 5 ipc, one thing is crystal clear that nothing in the penal code shall affect any provisions of any special act and when for any act or omission in a particular subject, a special set .....

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Ms. Mar Appraem Kuri Co.Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and conducting any chitty by-(i) a company owned by the government of kerala; or (ii) a co-operative society registered or deemed to be registered under the co-operative societies act for the time being in force; or (iii) a scheduled bank as defined in the reserve bank of india act, 1934 ; or (iv) a corresponding new bank constituted ..... all subscribers.section 1 - short title, extent and commencement (1) this act may be called the chit funds act, 1982. (2) it extends to the whole of india except the state of jammu and kashmir.(3) it shall come into force on such date as the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, appoint and different dates may ..... (40 of 1982). section 1(2) of the said act states that the act extends to the whole of india, except the state of jammu and kashmir whereas section 1(3) states that it shall come into force on such date as the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, appoint and different dates may be appointed for .....

Zacarias Durate Dmoingos Pereira Vs. Camilo Inacil Evaristo Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom295

..... and from which the civil p.c. 1908 and the arbitration act, 1940 came into force in the territory of goa, daman and diu'.19. it is needless to ..... .18. sub-section (1) of section 1 provides that the act shall come into force on such date as the central government may by notification in the official gazette appoint. accordingly, by notification no. s.o. 1597 dated may 24, 1966 published in the gazetter of india , dated june 10, 1966, the central government has appointed the 15th june, 1966 as the date on .....

Shri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696

..... authority under the mrtp act while granting building permit/sanction is strictly as per the provisions of the mrtp act.50. similarly, section 21 of the ulc act empowers the state government to declare the vacant land in excess of ceiling limit not to be surplus in certain contingencies mentioned therein. section 21 contemplates that where a ..... cut-off date for taking action under the impugned govt. resolution. the exemption orders under section 20(1)(a) as per existing policy of government have already been granted and acted upon and the schemes are completed in most cases. no action, as envisaged by new govt. resolution can be justified and possible.12. counsel ..... limit, to regulate the construction of buildings on such land and for matters connected therewith, except as provided in articles 249 and 250 of the constitution of india. similarly, in pursuance of clause (1) of article 52 of the constitution, resolutions have been passed by all the houses of legislatures of the states such .....

M/s. Nestle India Limited Vs. The Food Safety and Standards Authority ...

Court : Mumbai

..... withdrawn from operation in a given area or in given cases so as not to be applicable to a given class of persons who are otherwise admittedly governed by the act: and (3) where the exercise of conditional legislation would depend upon satisfaction of the delegate on objective facts placed by one class of persons seeking benefit ..... pan masala products i.p. ltd. (supra) has observed in para 73 as under:- natural justice: 73. learned counsel for the state of maharashtra cited union of india vs. cynamaide india ltd. [(1987) 2 scc 720] where this court observed thus: (scc pp.735-36) "7. the third observation we wish to make is, price fixation is ..... public good and for promoting public interest. ? 170.7. and seventhly, article 14 of the constitution of india applies also to matters of governmental policy even in contractual matters, and if the policy or any action of the government fails to satisfy the test of reasonableness, the same would be unconstitutional. ? 171. thereafter our attention was .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

..... : (i) in fact, in state of bombay vs. f.n. balsara (air 1951 sc 318), the matter arose under the entries in the vii schedule of the government india act 1935, the question was whether bombay prohibition act, encroached upon entry 19 of list i and entry 31 of list ii. it was held that the principles which ..... reference to subsequent central law or amendment made to central law. 23. the proviso to clause (2) of article 254 of the constitution of india is a departure from section 107 of the government of india act, 1935. power of the central legislature is enlarged enabling the central legislature to enact a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing a law ..... constitution? (a) the power to levy sales tax even prior to the commencement of the constitution of india was on the provincial legislatures vide entry 48 of list ii to the government of india act, 1935. after the commencement of the constitution of india, the power to impose sale tax is relatable to entry 54 of list ii as a state subject. .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... are as under: (i) in fact, in state of bombay vs. f.n. balsara (air1951sc318, the matter arose under the entries in the vii schedule of the government india act 1935, the question was whether bombay prohibition act, encroached upon entry 19 of list i and entry 31 of list ii. it was held that the principles which ..... with reference to subsequent central law or amendment made to central law.23. the proviso to clause (2) of article 254 of the constitution of india is a departure from section 107 of the government of india act, 1935. power of the central legislature is -:338. :- enlarged enabling the central legislature to enact a law adding to, amending, varying or ..... ?. (a) the power to levy sales tax even prior to the commencement of the constitution of india was on the provincial legislatures vide entry 48 of list ii to the government of india act, 1935. after the commencement -:295. :- of the constitution of india, the power to impose sale tax is relatable to entry 54 of list ii as a state .....

The Tufanialonga Tea Co. Ltd., Calcutta and anr. Vs. State of Tripura ...

Court : Guwahati

..... and possession of the tripura tea development corporation limited appointed as custodian of the properties of the tea estates under the impugned ordinance and the impugned act by the state government and the two petitioner companies or their authorised agents were not in the management and possession of the two tea estates when the notices were hung ..... petitioner for rehabilitation of the tea units taken over by the state government. mr. b.k. das, learned counsel for the united bank of india contended that the amount payable to the petitioner companies under section 5 of the impugned act should be paid by the state government to the said bank so that the liabilities of the petitioner ..... companies to die bank can be adjusted. he cited 'the decision of b.l. hansaria j in b.c. chaturvedi v. union of india, air 1996 sc 484, that the high .....

Chunilal Vallabhaji Gandhi Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1959Bom554; (1959)61BOMLR807; 1959CriLJ1429; ILR1959Bom1336

..... in the said rules to the central government, government or chief commissioner shall be deemed to be references to the state government. evidently the rules must be regarded as framed by the state government and not by the central government.7. section 33 of the drugs act, 1940, was amended by section 15 of india act 11 of 1955, and the first sub ..... giving effect to the provisions of chapter iv. there is no dispute that after india act 11 of 1955 was enacted, the central government did not immediately frame rules in exercise of the powers conferred by section 33 of the drugs act, 1940, as amended by act 11 of 1955. mr. gordhandas contends that on the amendment of the drugs ..... -section of section 15, in so far as it is material, provides that the central government may, after consultation with the board and .....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR1605

..... and another decision in vijayakumar sharma though they are binding upon the state of karnataka under article 141 of the constitution of india?g) whether the state government was justified in repealing the kcca act, when it was enacted to discharge the directive principles of the state policy in compliance with the constitutional obligations as envisaged in ..... of contract carriage permits w.e.f 1.4.2003 by virtue of repeal of the kcca act and on the lines of liberalised policy of the government of india by enacting the m.v. act of 1988 by repealing m.v. act of 1939. it is contended by the learned counsel for private contract carriage permit holders petitioners ..... to grant permit is an exception, in view of the liberalised transport policy evolved by the union of india by enacting the above act. it is further claimed that the various schemes published by the state government in respect of notified routes of different pockets in the state are applicable only to stage carriage permits creating .....