Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed chapter i distribution of powers Page 5 of about 517 results (0.085 seconds)

J.M. Malhotra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]89CompCas600(Mad)

..... been supreme court judges, senior high court judges and secretaries to the government of india, etc., for hearing appeals against the orders of the board.' 6. chapter i of the act deals with the preliminaries such as title, extent, commencement and application of the act and the definition clauses. 7. chapter ii deals with the board and ..... appellate authority for industrial and financial reconstruction. as per section 4 of the act, the central government ..... powers and discharge the functions and duties conferred or imposed on the board under the act. the board consists of a chairman and not less than two and not more than fourteen members to be appointed by the central government. the chairman of the board shall have to be the person who has been .....

The Hingir-rampur Coal Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC459; [1961]2SCR537

..... that contention and held that the levy was in pith and substance a tax on lands, which came within entry 42 of list ii of the seventh schedule to the government of india act. a distinction was made between a tax on land which is levied on the basis of its capital value and a tax which is on capital treating it as ..... to the tax was on the ground that it was tax on income or capital value within items 54 and 55 of list i of the seventh schedule of the government of india act and could not therefore be imposed by the bombay legislature. it was held that the tax was a tax on lands and buildings within the meaning of item 42 ..... which imposed the liability to pay the specified contribution on every mutt or temple having an annual income exceeding rs. 250 for services rendered by the state government. the scheme of the impugned act was examined and it was noticed that the collections made under it are not merged in the general public revenue are not appropriated in the manner laid down .....

A.N. Lakshmana Shenoy Vs. the Income Tax Officer, Ernakulam and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1958SC795; [1958]34ITR275(SC); [1959]1SCR751

..... within a fortnight of the appointed day execute on behalf of the united state an instrument of accession in accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the government of india act, 1935, and in place of the earlier instruments of accession of the covenanting states; and he shall by such instrument, accept as matters with respect to ..... by the rajpramukh by which he accepted, on behalf of the united state, all matters enumerated in list i and list iii of the seventh schedule to the government of india act, 1935, as matters in respect of which the dominion legislature might make laws for the united state, subject, however, to the proviso that nothing contained in ..... the said lists or in any other provision of the government of india act, 1935, shall be deemed to empower the dominion legislature to impose any tax or duty in the territories of the united state. the result was that in .....

Attorney-general of Ontario and Others Vs. Attorney-general of Canada ...

Court : Privy Council

Reported in : AIR1947PC206

..... the words of the section read and applied as prima facie intended to endow parliament with power to effect high political objects concerning the self-government of the dominion (s. 3, b. n. a. act) in the matter of judicature is to be held and exercised as a plenary power in that behalf with all ancillary powers necessary to ..... with the advice and consent of the senate and house of commons to make laws for the peace order and good government of canada in relation to all matters not coming within the classes of subjects by this act exclusively assigned to the legislatures of the provinces, and for greater certainty, but not so as to restrict the generality ..... the one hand and the provinces on the other hand cover the whole area of self-government within the whole area of canada. it would be subversive of the entire scheme and policy of the act to assume that any point of internal self-government was withheld from canada " (words that their lordships reiterate in regard to the present appeal .....

Danone Narang Beverages Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka, Repres ...

Court : Karnataka

..... following clarification, as per communication dated 26.7.2012, a copy of which is at annexure - h, which reads as follows: "wm-9(37)/2012 government of india ministry of consumer affairs, food and public distribution department of consumer affairs legal metrology division krishi bhawan,new delhi-01 dated : 26.7.2012 to, the controller ..... , delivered or otherwise transferred, offered, exposed for sale any pre-packaged commodity which does not conform to the declarations on the package as provided in this act, shall be punished with fine which may extend to twenty five thousand rupees, for the second offence, with fine which may extent to fifty thousand rupees and ..... in the light of the above rival contentions, it is to be noticed that the offence alleged to have been committed is one punishable under section 36 of the lm act. the said provision is extracted hereunder for ready reference. "36. penalty for selling, etc., of non-standard packages.- (1) whoever manufactures, packs, imports, sells, .....

Danone Narang Beverages Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the following clarification, as per communication dated 26.7.2012, a copy of which is at annexure - h, which reads as follows: wm-9(37)/2012 government of india ministry of consumer affairs, food & public distribution department of consumer affairs legal metrology division to, krishi bhawan,new delhi-01 dated :26. 7.2012 the controller ..... commodities) rules, 2011, which also allows the online declaration of mrp on the crown / neck of bottles containing packaged drinking water. according to the provisions of the act and rules.2. it is therefore requested that necessary action may be taken 15 yours faithfully, sd/- (b.n.dixit) director, legal metrology tele no.011- ..... in the light of the above rival contentions, it is to be noticed that the offence alleged to have been committed is one punishable under section 36 of the lm act. the said provision is extracted hereunder for ready reference. 36. penalty for selling, etc., of non-standard packages.- (1) whoever manufactures, packs, imports, sells, .....

Yash Developers Vs. Harihar Krupa Co Operative Housing Society Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to the high court to devise such methods as it deems fit and appropriate. having examined the matter, the bench may consider directing the government to constitute a committee for performance audit of the act. the court s jurisdiction extends only to that extent, and no further. the law-making, including amendments, is the exclusive domain of ..... scc671 preeti gupta v. state of jharkhand, (2010) 7 scc667 arif azim co. ltd. v. aptech ltd., (2024) 5 scc313 public interest foundation v. union of india, (2019) 3 scc224 38 court experienced lawyers would lay bare the fault-lines in the statutory scheme, iv) many a times court silently witnesses the play of statutory power ..... s own showing that the petitioner was required to take the crutches/financial assistance initially from rajesh habitat pvt. ltd., who in turn looked at vistra itcl india ltd. and thereafter having failed with both these entities, with one m/s sanghvi associates, which is not for a small amount but for a substantial amount .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... jethabhai26, that the words 'administration of justice' and 'constitution and organization of all courts' in item one of list ii of the seventh schedule to the government of india act, 1935 must be understood in a restricted sense excluding from their scope 'jurisdiction and powers of courts' specifically dealt with in item 2 of list ii. in ..... high court and held that the impugned section fell within the legislative power of the state under entry 20 of list iii of schedule seven of the government of india act, 1935 corresponding to entry 35 of list iii of the seventh schedule of the constitution. the said decision has been followed by this court in tansukh ..... encroachment on the topic of inter-state trade and commerce, even assuming there is some, cannot invalidate the act. the motor vehicles act, 1939 was enacted under entry 20 of list iii of schedule seven of the government of india act, 1935 corresponding to entry 35 of list hi of the seventh schedule to the constitution. the subject being .....

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... in state of madras v. gannon dunkerley & co. (madras) ltd.97 (scr at p. 413) this court considered schedule vii list ii entry 48 of the government of india act, 1935, "taxes on the sale of goods", in accordance with the established legal sense of the word "sale", which had acquired a definite precise sense and held ..... of forests, any land which currently is classified as forest, is a function that comes within the jurisdiction of the government of india, as the law stands now. section 2 of the forest conservation act, 1980 says: "2. restriction on the dereservation of forestrs or use of forest land for non forest purpose-notwithstanding anything contained ..... w.p(c) no.26691 of 2010, etc. -:58. :- working plans approved by the government of india for each forest division.35. refuting the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners on the constitutional validity of the 2003 act, it is contended that the state legislature have legislative competence to enact the law. it is submitted .....

Satbir Singh and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT85; 2003(66)DRJ775

..... consolidation and assignment or reservation of land for common purposes the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was enacted. the same has been extended to the union territory of delhi vide government of india, ministry of home affairs notification no. gsr 744 dated 23.4,1963,'57. the said statements would amount to ..... .4. mr. b.s. malik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, inter alia, submitted that upon coming into force of delhi land reforms act, 1954, the first respondent-government of nct of delhi, ceased to have any power or jurisdiction or authority to undertake the functions and duties of goan sabha and consequently the notification ..... in jai bhagwan and ors. v. union of india, : 99(2002)dlt392 , this court relying on the earlier decision of a division bench in umed singh and ors. v. government of nct and ors., : 69(1997)dlt957 , it was held:.'18. there is nothing in the act to show that the power of consolidation once exercised, .....